This trial is a prospective, randomized, controlled, multi-center study of subjects presenting with chronic lower extremity venous ulcers. The study will evaluate the safety and effectiveness of MIST Therapy® plus standard of care (MIST+SOC) compared to Standard of Care (SOC) alone in the treatment of lower extremity venous ulcers.
The study compared the treatment effect of non-contact low frequency ultrasound in addition to standard of care versus standard of care alone in healing chronic venous leg ulcers in subjects who had documented venous stasis and reflux. Subjects that were screened and met the major inclusion criteria received standardized treatment of 30 to 40 mmHg compression, moist wound healing dressings, and debridement for a two week run-in period. If their study ulcer did not decreased by greater than 30% they were eligible for randomization. The primary endpoint was wound area reduction after four (4) weeks of study treatment. The study was performed at 22 study centers. The study included two sub-studies: fluid and tissue analysis and a wound recidivism registry that are ongoing.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
156
Non-contact low frequency ultrasound therapy
South Shore Hospital
Weymouth, Massachusetts, United States
Wound Area Mean Percent Reduction
Compare between the treatment groups percent wound area reduction at four weeks of study treatment. H0: µMIST+SC -- µSC = 0 HA: µMIST+SC -- µSC ≠ 0 Where µ = percent reduction in wound size.
Time frame: 4 weeks post baseline visit (randomization visit)
Heal Rates
Compare rate of wound closure between study arms for 12 weeks post randomization. Descriptive statistics as not a powered endpoint.
Time frame: 12 weeks post randomization
Change in Pain VAS Scores
Compare VAS Pain Scores between arms at baseline and 4 weeks post randomization Subjects indicate their pain level by drawing a mark on a 10 cm line on a visual analog scale (VAS) at randomization and 4 week post treatment visit. The left end of the line indicates "no pain" and the right end of line indicates "worst pain imaginable". VAS score is determined by using a ruler placed at 0 (left end of scale) and measuring the distance from zero to the patient's mark . The objective is to compare the change in VAS values in MIST+SC to SC alone. H0: The average change in pain level is not different between MIST and SC HA: The average change in pain level is different between MIST and SC H0: µMIST = µSC vs HA: µMIST ≠ µSC, Statistical Analysis. A repeated measures ANCOVA will be used to test for differences in change in VAS with an indicator variable to indicate treatment, any demographic variables which were significant in the baseline comparisons.
Time frame: Baseline, 2 weeks and 4 weeks post randomization
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.