This study will test the safety of an aripiprazole injection in subjects with schizophrenia that are currently taking oral antipsychotic medication other than aripiprazole. Subjects in this study will receive one injection of aripiprazole and will need to stop taking their other antipsychotic medication two weeks after the injection. The study will last one month. Subjects will be required to come to a clinic for evaluations and drug and urine collection five times during the course of the study.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
60
400 mg intramuscular injection of aripiprazole
South Coast Clinical Trials
Anaheim, California, United States
Comprehensive Clinical Development
Cerritos, California, United States
Collaborative Neuroscience Network
Garden Grove, California, United States
South Coast Clinical Trials
Norwalk, California, United States
CNRI-San Diego
San Diego, California, United States
Neuropsychiatric Research Center of Orange County
Santa Ana, California, United States
Comprehensive Clinical Development
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States
Accurate Clinical Trials
Kissimmee, Florida, United States
Compass Research, LLC
Orlando, Florida, United States
St. Louis Clinical Trials
St Louis, Missouri, United States
...and 2 more locations
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AE).
An AE was defined as any new medical problem, or exacerbation of an existing problem, experienced by a participant while enrolled in the trial, whether or not it was considered drug related by the study physician. A serious adverse event (SAE) was any untoward medical occurrence that resulted in death or was life-threatening or required inpatient hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization. TEAE stands for treatment emergent adverse events.
Time frame: From the time the informed consent (ICF) was signed until follow-up at 30 days after the last trial visit (Day 28).
Change From Baseline in Total Score of Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) for Observed Cases (OC) Data.
The PANSS consisted of three subscales: a total of 30 symptom constructs. For each symptom construct, severity was rated on a 7-point scale, with a score of 1 (absence of symptoms) and a score of 7 (extremely severe symptoms). The PANSS total score was the sum of the rating scores for 7 positive scale items, 7 negative scale items, and 16 general psychopathology scale items from the PANSS panel. The PANSS total score ranged from 30 (best possible outcome) to 210 (worst possible outcome).
Time frame: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 4 and Last visit (Day 28).
Change From Baseline in Total Score of PANSS for Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) Data.
The PANSS consisted of three subscales: a total of 30 symptom constructs. For each symptom construct, severity was rated on a 7-point scale, with a score of 1 (absence of symptoms) and a score of 7 (extremely severe symptoms). The PANSS total score was the sum of the rating scores for 7 positive scale items, 7 negative scale items, and 16 general psychopathology scale items from the PANSS panel. The PANSS total score ranged from 30 (best possible outcome) to 210 (worst possible outcome).
Time frame: Baseline, Week 1, 2 and 4
Change From Baseline in PANSS Positive Sub-scale Score for OC Data.
The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) consisted of three subscales: a total of 30 symptom constructs. For each symptom construct, severity was rated on a 7-point scale, with a score of 1 (absence of symptoms) and a score of 7 (extremely severe symptoms). The PANSS positive subscale score was the sum of the rating scores for the 7 positive scale items from the PANSS panel. The 7 positive symptom constructs are delusions, conceptual disorganization, hallucinatory behavior, excitement, grandiosity, suspiciousness/persecution, and hostility. The PANSS total score ranged from 30 (best possible outcome) to 210 (worst possible outcome).
Time frame: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 4 and Last visit (Day 28).
Change From Baseline in PANSS Positive Sub-scale Score for LOCF Data.
The PANSS consisted of three subscales: a total of 30 symptom constructs. For each symptom construct, severity was rated on a 7-point scale, with a score of 1 (absence of symptoms) and a score of 7 (extremely severe symptoms). The PANSS positive subscale score was the sum of the rating scores for the 7 positive scale items from the PANSS panel. The 7 positive symptom constructs are delusions, conceptual disorganization, hallucinatory behavior, excitement, grandiosity, suspiciousness/persecution, and hostility. The PANSS total score ranged from 30 (best possible outcome) to 210 (worst possible outcome).
Time frame: Baseline, Week 1, 2 and 4
Change From Baseline in PANSS Negative Sub-scale Score for OC Data.
The PANSS consisted of three subscales: a total of 30 symptom constructs. For each symptom construct, severity was rated on a 7-point scale, with a score of 1 (absence of symptoms) and a score of 7 (extremely severe symptoms). The PANSS negative subscale score was the sum of the rating scores for the 7 negative scale items from the PANSS panel. The 7 negative symptom constructs: blunted affect, emotional withdrawal, poor rapport, passive apathetic withdrawal, difficulty in abstract thinking, lack of spontaneity and flow of conversation, stereotyped thinking. The PANSS total score ranged from 30 (best possible outcome) to 210 (worst possible outcome).
Time frame: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 4 and Last visit (Day 28).
Change From Baseline in PANSS Negative Sub-scale Score for LOCF Data.
The PANSS consisted of three subscales: a total of 30 symptom constructs. For each symptom construct, severity was rated on a 7-point scale, with a score of 1 (absence of symptoms) and a score of 7 (extremely severe symptoms). The PANSS negative subscale score was the sum of the rating scores for the 7 negative scale items from the PANSS panel. The 7 negative symptom constructs: blunted affect, emotional withdrawal, poor rapport, passive apathetic withdrawal, difficulty in abstract thinking, lack of spontaneity and flow of conversation, stereotyped thinking. The PANSS total score ranged from 30 (best possible outcome) to 210 (worst possible outcome).
Time frame: Baseline, Week 1, 2 and 4
Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression Severity (CGI-S) Score in OC Data.
The severity of illness for each participant was rated using the CGI-S scale. To assess CGI-S, the study physician answered the following question: "Considering your total clinical experience with this particular population, how mentally ill is the participant at this time?" Response choices included: 0 = not assessed; 1 = normal, not ill at all; 2 = borderline mentally ill; 3 = mildly ill; 4 = moderately ill; 5 = markedly ill; 6 = severely ill; and 7 = among the most extremely ill participants.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 4 and Last visit (Day 28).
Change From Baseline in CGI-S Score in LOCF Data.
The severity of illness for each participant was rated using the CGI-S scale. To assess CGI-S, the rater or investigator answered the following question: "Considering your total clinical experience with this particular population, how mentally ill is the participant at this time?" Response choices included: 0 = not assessed; 1 = normal, not ill at all; 2 = borderline mentally ill; 3 = mildly ill; 4 = moderately ill; 5 = markedly ill; 6 = severely ill; and 7 = among the most extremely ill participants.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 1, 2 and 4.
Clinical Global Impression Improvement (CGI-I) Scale Score in OC Data.
The efficacy of trial medication were rated for each participant using the CGI-I scale. The study physician must rate the participant's total improvement whether or not it is due entirely to drug treatment. All responses were compared to the participant's condition a baseline. Response choices include: 0 = not assessed; 1 =very much improved; 2 = much improved; 3 = minimally improved; 4 = no change; 5 =minimally worse; 6 = much worse; and 7 = very much worse.
Time frame: Week 1, 2, 4 and Last visit (Day 28).
CGI-I Scale Score in LOCF Data.
The efficacy of trial medication were rated for each participant using the Clinical Global Impression Improvement (CGI-I) scale. The study physician must rate the participant's total improvement whether or not it is due entirely to drug treatment. All responses were compared to the participant's condition a baseline. Response choices include: 0 = not assessed; 1 =very much improved; 2 = much improved; 3 = minimally improved; 4 = no change; 5 =minimally worse; 6 = much worse; and 7 = very much worse.
Time frame: Week 1, 2 and 4
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.