Hepatitis C infection is a major public health problem with nearly 175 million infected individuals worldwide. Although cure is possible, only 20-40% of patients spontaneously resolve infection and 40-80% of chronically infected patients (numbers vary depending on viral genotype) that receive pegylated-interferon-alfa2a/ribavirin therapy clear the virus and are sustained virologic responders (SVR). Still for many, the virus manages to circumvent natural immunity and current therapeutic strategies, resulting in significant morbidity and mortality. To better define the distinct clinical outcomes of HCV infection many investigators have performed candidate molecules screens or transcriptional profiling in order to identify correlates of viral clearance. One molecule that has gained significant attention is CXCL10 (also known as interferon-gamma induced protein-10 or IP-10) as an important negative prognostic biomarker. Given that CXCL10 is produced by hepatocytes and mediates chemo-attraction of activated lymphocytes expressing the CXCL10-receptor, CXCR3, it is counter-intuitive as to why this chemokine correlates with therapeutic non-responsiveness. The investigators hypothesized and have now demonstrated that CXCL10 is being cleaved in situ, resulting in the generation of an antagonist form of the chemokine. Based on the use of specific inhibitors, the investigators now propose to test whether protection of the agonist form of CXCL10 will increase responsiveness to peg-IFN-alfa2 / ribavirin therapy. This can be achieved using DPPIV inhibitors, targeting the enzyme responsible for N-terminal truncation of CXCL10. If safety is confirmed, the efficacy of DPPIV-inhibition in HCV patients will be tested in future trials that examine potential clearance benefits.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
3
100 mg Sitagliptin daily for 15 weeks
Centre Hospitalier Victor Dupuy
Argenteuil, France
Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal Créteil
Créteil, France
Henri Mondor Hospital
Créteil, France
Cochin Hospital
Paris, France
Safety (Number of adverse events, Toxicity grade > 3)
Time frame: After Day 1 until the end of the trial, i.e. a duration of 15 weeks for each patient
Change in Viral Load as compared to baseline
Time frame: week 1, 2, 3 of sitagliptin monotherapy; week 2, 4, 12 of triple therapy
Metabolic studies: Oral glucose tolerance will be assessed
Time frame: baseline, week 1 of sitagliptin monotherapy; week 2 of triple therapy
Immunologic study
Monitoring the short and long form of IP-10 as compared to the total plasma concentration (three distinct ELISA assays).
Time frame: baseline, week 1 and 3 of sitagliptin monotherapy; week 1, 2, 4, 12 of triple therapy
Immunologic study
Plasma concentration and activity of DPPIV (measured using an ELISA and a luciferase-based bioassay, respectively).
Time frame: baseline; week 1 and 3 of sitagliptin monotherapy; week 1, 2, 4, 12 of triple therapy
Immunologic study
Frequency of CXCR3+ cells in circulation (monitored by FACS).
Time frame: baseline, week 1 and 3 of sitagliptin monotherapy; week 1, 2, 4, 12 of triple therapy.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.