\- Progression free survival after locally ablative therapy and erlotinib in EGFR patients progressed after EGFR-TKI therapy
Primary Objectives \- To estimate progression free survival (PFS) after locally ablative therapy and erlotinib in EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients who progressed on prior EGFR-TKI therapy Secondary Objectives * To evaluate local control of sites previously progressive on erlotinib following stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) followed by erlotinib * To estimate overall survival (OS) after locally ablative therapy and erlotinib in EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients who progressed on prior EGFR-TKI therapy * To characterize the toxicity of SRS * To characterize the toxicity of erlotinib when preceded by SRS Exploratory Objectives * To explore if VeriStrat results at initial progression are associated with longer PFS or OS after study treatment * To explore if VeriStrat results following completion of SRS are associated with longer PFS or OS after re-initiation of erlotinib * To explore whether "poor" VeriStrat signatures ever turn to "good" signatures with the study therapy, and to explore PFS and OS of patients whose signature changes
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
32
21 Gy daily for 5 days
150mg once daily
University of California at San Francisco
San Francisco, California, United States
University of Colorado Cancer Center
Aurora, Colorado, United States
Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
East Carolina University
Percentage of Participants With Progression Free Survival
Progression free survival (PFS) after locally ablative therapy and erlotinib in EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients who progressed on prior EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy reported as percentage of participants who are alive and without progressive disease at 3 months. Progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.1), as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or the appearance of new lesions.
Time frame: 3 months after Initiation of Stereostatic Radiotherapy
Percentage of Participants With Local Control of Sites on Erlotinib Following Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS)
Count of subjects who had local control of sites previously progressive on erlotinib following SRS followed by erlotinib. Using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.1), local control is defined as Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; or Partial Response (PR), \>=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; in sites ablated by SRS.
Time frame: Initiation of Stereotactic Radiotherapy every 6 to 12 weeks until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 60 months
Median Overall Survival
To estimate overall survival (OS) after locally ablative therapy and erlotinib in EGFR-mutant, NSCLC patients who progressed on prior EGFR-TKI therapy measured as length of time from start of treatment until date of death from any cause
Time frame: up to 5 years after end of treatment
Toxicity Rate From Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS)
Toxicity of SRS will be measured by NCI CTCAE version 4 following completion of SRS, but prior to erlotinib re-initiation. The NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events is a descriptive terminology which can be utilized for Adverse Event (AE) reporting. A grading (severity) scale is provided for each AE term. Grade 1 Mild; asymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; intervention not indicated. Grade 2 Moderate; minimal, local or noninvasive intervention indicated; limiting age-appropriate instrumental Activities of Daily Living (ADL). Grade 3 Severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling; limiting self care ADL. Grade 4 Life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated. Grade 5 Death related to AE.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Greenville, North Carolina, United States
STO Taussig Cancer Center; Cleveland Clinic
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
Fox Chase Cancer Center
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
University of Pittsburgh Medical Center
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
Swedish Cancer Institute
Seattle, Washington, United States
Time frame: From initiation to the end of SRS, up to 15 days
Toxicity Rate Attributed to Erlotinib
Toxicity of erlotinib will be graded using the NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE version 4) which is a descriptive terminology which can be utilized for Adverse Event (AE) reporting. A grading (severity) scale is provided for each AE term. Grade 1 Mild; asymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; intervention not indicated. Grade 2 Moderate; minimal, local or noninvasive intervention indicated; limiting age-appropriate instrumental Activities of Daily Living (ADL). Grade 3 Severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling; limiting self care ADL. Grade 4 Life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated. Grade 5 Death related to AE.
Time frame: from end of SRS to end of erlotinib treatment (median duration of 5.7 months)