The main objective of this study is to determine the feasibility of optimizing the IMRT treatment plan based on dosimeter measurements of mucosal radiation dose adjacent to the dental fillings to reduce such dose to \< 35 Gy without compromising tumor coverage and/or increasing the dose to the remaining oral cavity or nearby parotid glands.
Using radiation dosimeter, we will perform measurement of the doses received by the mucosa adjacent to the dental fillings in patients receiving IMRT for head and neck cancer. If the mucosa dose is estimated to be greater than 35 Gy for the entire radiation course, we will generate and implement a "filling" optimized IMRT plan, provided that this new plan does not compromise tumor coverage or increase dose to the rest of the oral mucosa or parotid glands. Dosimeter will be used to measure the mucosal dose delivered by this new IMRT plan. Patient's mucositis grade, narcotic use and self-reported mouth and throat soreness scores will be recorded and correlated to mucosal dose. We hypothesize that modulation of an IMRT plan to reduce the dose delivered to adjacent normal mucosa surrounding the dental filling can decrease the severity and duration of radiation-related oral mucositis. Here we propose to use thermoluminescent dosimeter (TLD) to measure the mucosal dose adjacent to the dental fillings in a standard, "non-filling" optimized IMRT plan that is normally delivered in the clinic.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
30
We are using thermoluminescent dosimeter (TLD) to measure the mucosal dose adjacent to the dental fillings in a standard, "non-filling" optimized IMRT (intensity modulated radiotherapy treatment) plan that is normally delivered in the clinic. If the measured mucosal dose exceeds 35 Gy, we will generate a "filling" optimized IMRT plan to reduce it to \< 35 Gy. The new plan will be deemed acceptable and implemented only if it does not (1) compromise the tumor coverage, (2) increase the dose to either the remaining oral cavity or the spared parotid gland(s).
Stanford University School of Medicine
Stanford, California, United States
Time Until the Maximum Oral Mucositis Measured From the Start of Radiation Treatment.
The time to onset of oral mucositis was measured from the start of radiation treatment until oral mucositis was visual observed by a clinician during the weekly checkup for the first time. Analysis done by Kaplan-Meier. Adverse events were graded according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version (V) 4.0. Medical doctor performed evaluation and grading of clinical and functional mucositis for the measured site weekly during the radiation treatment course and biweekly after completion of radiation until oral mucositis was \< grade 2. A pain medication assessment was done for each mucositis time point. Patients completed the Oral Mucositis Weekly Questionnaire-Head and Neck cancer (OMWQ-HN) during and after treatment until oral mucositis is \< grade 2.
Time frame: 3 years
Duration of Grade 2 or Higher Oral Mucositis After First Oral Mucositis Was Observed.
The duration of grade 2 or higher oral mucositis was measured as the time from the first time oral mucositis was observed by a clinician at the weekly checkup until the oral mucositis was resolved. The data was analyzed in a mixed effects model to account for the within subject correlation, since each patient contributed two measurements to the data set. The model was limited to those subjects who had experienced mucositis and then the outcome was the duration of grade 2 or higher mucositis. This allowed us to model the data in a mixed effects model with the continuous outcome of duration of grade 2 or higher mucositis.
Time frame: 3 years
Relationship Between the Measured Lateral Tongue Mucosal Dose and the Amount of Narcotic Use
The narcotics use was a patient reported measurement that was documented in the medical note in the patient chart. Patient self reported measurements are generally known to be unreliable.
Time frame: 3 years
How Does Increase in Soreness Scores Affect Quality of Life Questionnaire While Adjusting for the Measured Lateral Tongue Mucosal Dose
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
The quality of life questionnaire was the HNC adaptation of the Oral Mucositis Daily Questionnaire (OMWQ). It is designed to assess the severity and impact of the oral mucositis by evaluating mouth and throat soreness and the degree to which the mouth and throat soreness interferes with activities of daily life such as eating, swallowing, drinking, talking and sleeping. This outcome measures soreness in both the mouth and throat. This outcome is not a combination of several sub-scales. This outcome was the response to the single question: "On a scale from 0 to 10, how would you rate your OVERALL MOUTH AND THROAT SORENESS during the past 24 hours?" Mouth and throat soreness was measured as a single scale from 0 (no soreness) to 10 (worst soreness possible).
Time frame: 3 years
How Does Increase in Pain Scores Affect Quality of Life Questionnaire While Adjusting for the Measured Lateral Tongue Mucosal Dose?
The quality of life questionnaire was the HNC adaptation of the Oral Mucositis Daily Questionnaire (OMDQ). It is designed to assess the severity and impact of the oral mucositis by evaluating mouth and throat soreness and the degree to which the mouth and throat soreness interferes with activities of daily life such as eating, swallowing, drinking, talking and sleeping. This outcome measures pain in the mouth only. This outcome is not a combination of several sub-scales. This outcome was the response to a single question: "On a scale from 0 to 10, what number best describes the MOUTH PAIN that you experienced in the past 24 hours?" Mouth pain scale was measured as a single scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable).
Time frame: 3 years