Primary Hypotheses: Senofilcon A will provide significantly less rotation with subjects in a recumbent position than Filcon II 3 monthly . Etafilcon A will provide significantly less rotation with subjects in a recumbent position than Filcon II 3 1 1 day . Etafilcon A will provide rotation with subjects a recumbent position non-inferior to nelfilcon A. A margin of 5 degrees will be used. Secondary Hypotheses: Senofilcon A will have significantly better monocular visual performance with subjects in a recumbent position than Filcon II 3 monthly. Etafilcon A for astigmatism will have significantly better monocular visual performance with subjects in a recumbent position than Filcon II 3 1 day. Etafilcon A will have monocular visual performance with subjects in a recumbent position non-inferior nelfilcon A. A margin of 0.05 LogMAR will be used.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
24
bilateral daily use soft contact lens
bilateral daily use soft contact lens
bilateral daily use soft contact lens
bilateral daily use soft contact lens
bilateral daily use soft contact lenses
Unnamed facility
Farnham, Surrey, United Kingdom
Lens Orientation in Recumbent Position
rotation from zero position also described as absolute value of the rotation.
Time frame: up to 60 minutes in recumbent position
Monocular Visual Acuity in Recumbent Position
Visual Acuity measured in LogMAR units. High contrast visual acuity (VA) was measured in both eyes using a 3m LogMAR test chart at 2.5m testing distance (subsequently converted).
Time frame: up to 60 minutes in recumbent position
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.