The purpose of the study is to assess the efficacy and safety and PK of AZD8931 plus paclitaxel versus paclitaxel alone in patients with metastatic, gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction, cancer.
A Phase IIa Multi-centre Randomised Double-Blind Placebo-controlled Study to Assess the Efficacy, Safety and Pharmacokinetics of AZD8931 in Combination with Paclitaxel versus Paclitaxel alone in Patients with Metastatic, Gastric or Gastro-oesophageal Junction, Cancer who progress following First Line Therapy and are Ineligible for Treatment with trastuzumab by HER2 Status (SAGE)
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Enrollment
39
40 mg, oral dose twice daily
Placebo, oral dose twice daily
IV once weekly for 3 weeks followed by a week off.
Research Site
Cologne, Germany
Research Site
Hamburg, Germany
Research Site
Chūōku, Japan
Change in Tumour Size at 8 Weeks Were Analyzed for Comparing Relative Efficacy of AZD8931 Plus Paclitaxel With Paclitaxel Alone
Time frame: Baseline and 8 weeks, accessed up to data cut off on 4 December 2012
Progression-free Survival (PFS) Were Analysed for Comparing Relative Efficacy of AZD8931 Plus Paclitaxel With Paclitaxel Alone
Time from the date of randomization until the date of objective disease progression (as per RECIST1.1) or the date of death (by any cause in absence of progression).
Time frame: Baseline and every 8 weeks, accessed up to data cut off on 4 December 2012
The Objective Response Rate (ORR) Was Analysed for Investigating the Efficacy of AZD8931 Plus Paclitaxel With Paclitaxel Alone
The number of subjects with at least one visit response of CR or PR. (Per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.1) for target lesions and assessed by MRI: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), \>=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Progressive disease (PD), A ≥ 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions and an absolute increase of ≥ 5mm; Stable disease (SD), Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD; Not Evaluable (NE), All target lesion measurements are missing or \>1/3 target lesion measurements are missing and sum of diameters of non-missing target lesions does not qualify for PD; Not applicable (NA), No target lesions are recorded at baseline)
Time frame: Baseline and 8 weeks, accessed up to data cut off on 4 December 2012
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Research Site
Fukuoka, Japan
Research Site
Kawasaki-shi, Japan
Research Site
Matsuyama, Japan
Research Site
Sapporo, Japan
Research Site
Jeonju, South Korea
Research Site
Seongnam-si, South Korea
Research Site
Seoul, South Korea
...and 5 more locations