The purpose of this study is to compare the degree of stent malapposition on an immediate optical coherence tomography (OCT) after nominal stent pressure and at a final post-procedure OCT (ANCHOR-I) and the neointimal coverage on 3-months OCT following the intervention with the randomly assigned two drug-eluting stents (DES), PromusTMElementTM stents versus Xience PRIME® stents.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
100
Patients with native coronary arteries fulfilling all enrollment criteria will be randomly assigned to each DES group; either Promus Element or Xience Prime
Patients with native coronary arteries fulfilling all enrollment criteria will be randomly assigned to each DES group; either Promus Element or Xience Prime
Severance Hospital
Seoul, Seodaemun-gu/Sinchon-dong, South Korea
RECRUITINGthe ratio of the malapposed strut
The ratio of the malapposed strut, on an immediate OCT after nominal stent pressure and at a final post-procedure between two different DES; ANCHOR-I
Time frame: Participants will be followed from first OCT invervention to 3month OCT following intervention
Incidence of stent malapposition
Time frame: 3months OCT following intervention
Neointimal coverage(ANCHOR II)
Time frame: 3 month-OCT after stent implantation
Incidence of plaque prolapse
Time frame: final postprocedural OCT
Evaluation of stent expansion
Time frame: an immediate and post-procedural OCT
Stent malapposition
Time frame: on 3 month OCT intervention
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.