Therapy De-escalation in Seminoma Stage IIA/B

Overview

The main objective of this trial is to test the efficacy and safety of carboplatin chemotherapy and involved node radiotherapy in patients with stage IIA/B seminoma.

INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND 1. Disease background Testicular cancers are the most common malignancies in men aged between 18-35 years. Of those, seminoma is the most frequent as it accounts for about half of all testicular cancers. Seminoma is classified according to the involvement of and degree of spreading to lymph nodes and to the lung or other organs. Around 10% of all seminoma patients are diagnosed with stage IIA/B disease. Stage IIA patients have one or more enlarged regional lymph nodes, 2 cm or less in greatest dimension, without evidence of distant disease (cN1 cM0). Stage IIB patients have one or more enlarged regional lymph nodes more than 2 cm but not more than 5 cm in greatest dimension, without evidence of distant disease (cN2 cM0). Paraaortic, interaortocaval, para-/pre-/retrocaval and pre-/retroaortic lymph nodes are considered regional. Intrapelvic, external iliac and inguinal lymph nodes are considered regional only after scrotal or inguinal surgery. Seminoma stage IIA/B is highly responsive to chemotherapy or radiation therapy and the progression free survival at 5 or 6 years with such treatments is between 87-95%. Supra-diaphragmatic lymph nodes are the usual site of tumor recurrence after radiation therapy, while local failure or tumor persistence in paraaortic lymph nodes is predominant after chemotherapy. 2. Therapy background Current standard of therapy in patients with stage IIA/B seminoma involves either large volume paraaortic and ipsilateral pelvic radiation therapy ("dogleg field") or three cycles of chemotherapy with BEP (Bleomycin, Etoposide, Cisplatin). While both treatment modalities offer high rates of progression free survival and overall survival, they also potentially bear the risk of unwanted events during and following the treatment. Large volume radiation therapy is associated with fatigue, nausea and vomiting during treatment. BEP chemotherapy causes transient fatigue, cytopenia and hair loss. In terms of late adverse events, radiotherapy increases the risk for permanent kidney and bowel damage, while BEP chemotherapy may harm kidneys, lungs, heart and the inner ear. Both therapy modalities may also lead to secondary tumors. Data on late undesirable effects of large field radiation therapy or intensive chemotherapy will become available in the future at the conclusion of long term follow-up analyses of the recent trials. Thus, the current research on seminoma focuses on minimizing short and long term treatment-related morbidity. 3. Previous trials Therapy de-escalation has been tested and been proven effective in stage I testicular seminoma patients. For many years, the standard of care for these patients was paraaortic radiation therapy. The trial by Oliver et al. demonstrated the non-inferiority of single dose carboplatin chemotherapy in comparison to paraaortic irradiation in terms of tumor control in patients with stage I seminoma. Although the trial did not present long term data and the demonstration of a lower toxicity profile with carboplatin compared to paraaortic irradiation is still lacking, many clinicians have already switched their treatment strategy to carboplatin chemotherapy in seminoma stage I patients, in hope that this treatment will produce less negative late effects than radiation therapy. Based on these results, we think that a similar therapy de-escalation approach could be attractive in patients with stage II disease. 4. Rationale for performing the trial Therapy de-escalation for stage IIA/B seminoma has been recently tested in a prospective phase II trial with the use of 3 cycles (for stage IIA) or 4 cycles (for stage IIB) of carboplatin chemotherapy. However, this regime is actually not considered an acceptable treatment because of a relapse rate of 18% at three years. In this trial, all relapsed patients experienced tumor recurrence in the lymph nodes that were initially involved within 3 years following treatment. Thus, while chemotherapy de-escalation with carboplatin leads to a good systemic disease's control, the local control in the involved nodes remains a problem. On the other hand, no relapse occurs in the initially involved lymph nodes in seminoma IIA/B patients which were treated with large volume irradiation, although 5% of the patients developed distant relapses. Therefore, one possible way to raise progression free survival in the involved lymph nodes areas to an acceptable level in a therapy de-escalation protocol would be to combine suboptimal carboplatin chemotherapy (1 cycle) with a limited volume of radiation therapy targeting the involved nodes (30 or 36 Gy for stage IIA or IIB, respectively). It is expected that this combination will trigger less side effects than any of the standard therapies. Previous trials demonstrated that single agent carboplatin is not associated with an increase in the number of adverse events for up to 9 years post chemotherapy. The application of small volume, involved node radiation therapy should avoid damage to viscera and kidneys. Furthermore, the risk for secondary malignancies will likely be reduced because of the low-intensity chemotherapy and dramatically shrunk irradiation field. This is a single arm trial, in which both stage IIA and IIB patients are included, since all current international treatment recommendations are valid for both disease stages. Selecting exclusively one disease stage for trial inclusion would greatly hamper the feasibility of such a trial. The trial design, trial treatment and trial specifics are a consensus among the Swiss Urogenital Tumors Project Group, the Swiss Radio-oncology Section and the German Testicular Cancer Study Group. If the proposed therapy scheme proves to be effective and safe, it will provide a significantly relevant treatment alternative to large volume radiotherapy and intense chemotherapy, and may become the new standard of care for patients with seminoma stage IIA/B.

Conditions

Interventions

Eligibility

Locations (25)

Outcomes