Migraine headaches are a common problem for children. When treatment at home fails, children may benefit from intravenous treatment administered in a hospital setting like the Emergency Department. Most treatments used however have only been tested in adults and the best treatment strategy for children is not always clear. The combination of more than one medication is frequently prescribed in Canadian Emergency Departments. The purpose of this study is to investigate whether the combination of ketorolac (an anti-inflammatory pain medication) and metoclopramide (an anti-nauseant that may also relieve migraine headaches) is better than metoclopramide by itself.
Migraine headache is a painful condition of recurrent moderate to severe head pain associated with nausea, vomiting, photophobia, and phonophobia. The condition is highly prevalent and a significant community health problem with considerable impact on the health care system. To alleviate the pain and morbidity associated with a migraine attack, drug therapies are often employed including simple analgesics like ibuprofen and migraine-specific medications like sumatriptan. When these treatments fail or in severe, intractable cases, patients and families may present to the Emergency Department (ED). Ketorolac in combination with metoclopramide or prochlorperazine was the most common multi-drug combination used in 36% of ED presentations for migraine across Canada in our national practice variation study. The scientific rationale for combining a non-selective non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) with inhibition of both the cyclooxygenase (COX) 1 and 2 isoenzymes with other migraine therapies is enticing; however, no studies have specifically examined the relative efficacy of the practice. Why would the combination of a non-selective NSAID like ketorolac with other migraine therapies improve treatment outcomes? The benefit of multi-target combinations may be relate to the duration of the migraine and the multiple brain areas involved in sustained pain. It has long been recognized that patients who treat their migraine headaches early at the onset have a better response. The underlying mechanism for this phenomenon has now been identified. The initiation of migraine pain requires activation of the trigeminal (5th cranial nerve) nociceptive (pain) system. Activation of these sensory fibers within the arachnoid membrane on the surface of the brain produces the first and most common painful manifestation of migraine - the pulsatile headache. With each heartbeat, minor dilation of the cerebral blood vessels produces stretch and a painful activation of the trigeminal fibers known as peripheral sensitization. The second phase in the maintenance of a migraine attack over several hours is the sensitization of trigeminal pain pathways leading to higher brain centers known as central sensitization. The efficacy of medications like the triptans is greater early in the course of a migraine attack when there is only peripheral sensitization and before the onset of central sensitization. Non-selective NSAIDs like naproxen sodium and ketorolac may be uniquely effective in the reduction of central sensitization in the animal model of migraine and the reduction of migraine pain in adult patients late in the course of a migraine headache. The population of patients in the ED is uniquely different from outpatients in that most have developed their migraine headache hours or days before presenting. In our practice variation study, the mean duration of the migraine prior to presenting to the ED was 2 days. Including an NSAID when treating a prolonged migraine in the ED may thus increase the therapeutic window and improve outcomes. While many Canadian ED physicians have adopted the practice of combining ketorolac with other migraine therapies, the gold standard assessment of efficacy and safety in a randomized clinical trial has not been applied.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Enrollment
56
Ketorolac 0.5 mg/kg (max 30 mg) IV
Metoclopramide 0.2 mg/kg (max 10 mg) IV
Alberta Children's Hospital
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Stollery Children's Hospital
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Mean reduction in pain intensity
Measured on Visual Analogue Scale (VAS).
Time frame: 2 hours
Pain freedom
VAS=0
Time frame: 2 hours
Headache relief - 33
Defined as a 33% reduction on the VAS.
Time frame: 2 hours
Headache relief - 50
Defined as a 50% reduction on the VAS
Time frame: 2 hours
Presence of nausea
Time frame: 2 hours
Presence of vomiting
Time frame: 2 hours
Use of rescue medications
Permitted per protocol 60 minutes after start if intravenous infusion.
Time frame: 2 hours
Sustained pain-free
No recurrence of headache within 24 hours if pain was completely eliminated (VAS = 0) prior to discharge.
Time frame: 25 hours
Sustained headache relief
No increase in headache by 33% on the VAS or 50% on the VAS if headache relief was initially achieved.
Time frame: 24 hours
Minimum clinically significant difference
1. "I would take the medication again" 2. "My headache is a bit better/worse" 3. "My headache is a lot better/worse"
Time frame: 2 hours
Adverse events
All serious and non-serious adverse events including akathisia and dystonia.
Time frame: 2 hours
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.