Treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer needs chemotherapy in most of the cases. During these last years, many new chemotherapies and targeted therapies have been developed improving significantly the overall survival of patients. However, the choice of the therapeutic sequences becomes difficult due to the lack of validated predictive biomarkers of their efficiency. Indeed, only the mutation of the k-ras oncogene is a predictive factor of non-efficacy of the anti-EGFR antibodies. It is thus crucial to identify new biomarkers to propose the best personalized 1rst line therapeutic sequence. One idea would be to enumerate and characterize the circulating tumor cells (CTC) which, as it has been described in a recent study realized by Cohen et al. in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, would give us an early evaluation of the therapeutic efficiency. In this context, the investigators have developed an innovative technology, the EPISPOT assay (patent of the University Medical Center of Montpellier), that allows the detection \& characterization of viable CTC in the peripheral blood. The EPISPOT technology has been already evaluated in the breast and prostate cancer. Thus, the investigators would like to perform a prospective study on a cohort of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer to confirm, with this technology, the predictive value of CTC count for the efficacy of the treatment.
In the aim to study a homogeneous cohort of patients, the investigators will only recruit patients in first line of treatment and treated by 5-FU (IV), IRINOTECAN et BEVACIZUMAB combination.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
168
For each patient, we will perform a counting of CTC before chemotherapy and then at different time points after chemotherapy, using both technologies: EPISPOT and CellSearch®.For the EPISPOT, we will need 15 mL of peripheral blood on EDTA tubes. For each patient, five blood samples will be done: D0, D14, D28, D42 and D56. These different time points will help us to determine when the best moment is for the evaluation of the CTC with this technology.For the CellSearch®, we will need 10 mL of peripheral blood on a specific CellSave tube. Only two samples will be perform: D0 and D28 because Cohen et al. (2008) reported that the best appropriated moment to appreciate the CTC progression is between 3 and 5 weeks after the initiation of the treatment.
Medical Oncology, CHU St Eloi
Montpellier, France
Predictive value of the CTC on the Progression Free Survival
The primary outcome aims to evaluate the predictive value of the early progression of the CTC performed with the EPISPOT assay on the PFS in a cohort of patients treated with 5-FU, IRNOTECAN et AVASTIN (FOLFIRI or XELIRI-AVASTIN) in 1rst line of metastatic colorectal cancer. The progression disease is assessed based on imagery techniques.
Time frame: Duration study 3 years
Prognostic value of the CTC detected by EPISPOT
For the EPISPOT assay, 15 mL of peripheral blood will be collected on EDTA tubes. For each patient, 5 blood samples will be collected: at D0, D14, D28, D42 and D56.
Time frame: Duration study 3 years
Predictive value of the CTC on the overall survival
The overall survival will be defined as the time between the beginning of the chemotherapy and death.
Time frame: Duration study 3 years
VEGF expressions by the CTC
To evaluate the VEGF expression by the CTC with both technologies, the EPISPOT and the CellSearch®.
Time frame: Duration study 3 years
Comparison of the results with the CellSearch system vs EPISPOT
For the Cellsearch assay, 10 mL of peripheral blood will be collected on specific tubes. Only 2 samples will be performed: at D0 and D28. The Cellsearch and EPISPOT techniques will be performed in parallel and then compared.
Time frame: Duration study 3 years
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.