Dental services for large sectors of the population of the Western Cape (WC) Province of South Africa (SA) has been, and continues to be, limited to low-cost treatment options and emergency services, such as extractions at public health clinics. Replacement of missing teeth for the disadvantaged majority of the population is provided almost exclusively at the dental teaching institutions. Loss of teeth in the WC Province is, as elsewhere, the result of disease and the lack of restorative care and then having these replaced by a removable partial denture, if the patient can afford it Null Hypothesis: The daily functional needs and quality of life of partially dentate adult patients with a reduced posterior dental arch and /or a Shortened Dental Arch (SDA) will not be satisfied nor improved by replacing the posterior teeth with a removable prosthesis.
The aim of this research is to determine whether the daily functional needs and the quality of life of partially dentate adult patients with a reduced posterior dental arch will be satisfied and improved without having the posterior teeth replaced with a removable prosthesis, as compared to having the use of such prosthesis. Objectives: To conduct a randomized controlled trial amongst partially dentate adult patients with a reduced posterior dental arch (3-5 pairs of posterior occluding pairs of teeth) and where these patients will be randomly assigned to one of two groups: one group would be provided with a metal- based removable partial denture (RPDP) to replace the posterior teeth, the other will receive no treatment. Daily functioning ability and patient satisfaction between the groups (with/without RPDP) would then be compared.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
50
For Group A: a distal extension removable denture will be constructed for patients with a reduced posterior dental arch
For Group B: Patients with a reduced posterior dental arch will not be provided with a removable denture and will be compared to patients in Group A
Saadika Khan
Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa
Patient satisfaction
Two different tools will b used to assess primary outcomes 1. Oral Impact of Daily Performance (OIDP) tool 2. Global Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Time frame: 3 months
Functioning
Failure of intervention or patient unhappy with treatment prescribed
Time frame: 3 months
Oral health-related Quality of Life
A Tool will be used to assess primary outcome
Time frame: 3 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.