This was a multi-center, open-label, Phase Ib dose escalation /Phase II study in recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (RM HNSCC) patients considered to be resistant, ineligible or intolerant to platinum-based chemotherapy. The Phase Ib included three arms. Three different methods of administration and two different BYL719 formulations were studied to determine the MTD and/or RP2D of BYL719 in combination with cetuximab: Arm A - film-coated whole tablets were orally administered to patients who were able to swallow the tablets; Arm B - a drinkable suspension prepared from crushed film-coated tablets was administered orally to patients with swallowing dysfunction Arm C - a suspension from a dispersible tablet administered via G-tube, in patients with swallowing dysfunction. Arm C was used to investigate the pharmacokinetics (PK), compared to Arm A (film coated tablet), and safety of the dispersible tablet of the dispersible tablet formulation of BYL719. The Phase II investigated the clinical efficacy of BYL719 and consisted of an open label, randomized Phase II part investigating BYL719 in combination with cetuximab compared to cetuximab alone in patients resistant or intolerant to platinum and naïve to cetuximab (Scheme 1: Arm 1 and Arm 2), and a non-randomized Phase II part Scheme 2: Arm 3. In addition, patients who experienced disease progression in Arm 2 (cetuximab) were allowed to switch to the combination regimen (cross-over, Arm 2B). The safety of the BYL719 in combination with cetuximab was also further characterized in Arms 1, 2B and 3. Patients were treated until progression of disease), unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of informed consent, whichever occurred first (except for phase II Arm 2 had the opportunity to crossover to the combination treatment (Arm 2B). In the follow-up period all patients had to complete the safety follow-up assessments within 30 days after the last dose of the study treatment. Patients who did not have disease progression at the time of discontinuation of study treatment were radiologically followed for disease status until disease progression, initiation of subsequent anticancer therapies, or death, whichever occurred first. In addition, all patients enrolled in Phase II were followed for survival.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
179
Oral alpha-specific PI3K inhibitor
New formulation of the oral alpha-specific PI3K inhibitor
Recombinant chimeric monoclonal antibody driven against EGFR
Oral alpha-specific PI3K inhibitor
Novartis Investigative Site
Sacramento, California, United States
Novartis Investigative Site
San Francisco, California, United States
Novartis Investigative Site
Aurora, Colorado, United States
Novartis Investigative Site
Jacksonville, Florida, United States
Novartis Investigative Site
Orlando, Florida, United States
Phase Ib Arms A: Probability That Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs) Rate is in the Recommended Phase 2 Dose in Cycle 1 (Cycle 1=28 Days)
Maximum Tolerated Doses (MTDs) and/or recommended Phase II doses (RP2Ds) of BYL719 in combination with cetuximab in patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (RM HNSCC) in arm A (BYL719 administered as a whole tablet in patients able to swallow the tablets). Dose recommendation was based on posterior summaries including the mean, median, standard deviation, 95%-credibility interval, and the probability that the true DLT rate for each dose combination lies in one of the following categories: (0%, 16%) under-dosing; (16%, 35%) targeted toxicity; (35%, 100%) excessive toxicity. The combination treatment was considered superior to cetuximab alone if the posterior probability (HR \> 1) \< 10%, and the posterior median HR \< 0.7.
Time frame: until disease progression or intolerable toxicity (approximately 6 months)
Phase Ib Arm B: Probability That Distribution of Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs) is in the Recommended Phase 2 Dose in Cycle 1 (Cycle 1=28 Days)
Maximum Tolerated Doses (MTDs) and/or recommended Phase II doses (RP2Ds) of BYL719 in combination with cetuximab in patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (RM HNSCC) in arm B (crushed film-coated tablets as an oral suspension with swallowing dysfunction). Dose recommendation was based on posterior summaries including the mean, median, standard deviation, 95%-credibility interval, and the probability that the true DLT rate for each dose combination lies in one of the following categories: (0%, 16%) under-dosing; (16%, 35%) targeted toxicity; (35%, 100%) excessive toxicity. The combination treatment was considered superior to cetuximab alone if the posterior probability (HR \> 1) \< 10%, and the posterior median HR \< 0.7.
Time frame: until disease progression or intolerable toxicity (approximately 6 months)
For Phase Ib: Incidence of Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs) in Cycle 1 (28 Days)
Estimation of Maximum Tolerated Doses (MTDs) and/or recommended Phase II doses (RP2Ds) of BYL719 in combination with cetuximab in patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (RM HNSCC) in arm A (BYL719 administered as a whole tablet in patients able to swallow the tablets) and arm B (BYL719 administered as a drinkable suspension in patients with swallowing dysfunction). 6 months is an approximate timeframe.
Time frame: until disease progression or intolerable toxicity (approximately 6 months)
Phase II Arms 1 and 2: Progression Free Survival (PFS) as Per RECIST v1.1 by Central Radiology Review
Assessment of the anti-tumor activity of BYL719 in combination with cetuximab vs. cetuximab as single-agent in RM HNSCC patients naive to cetuximab. 6 months is an approximate timeframe.
Time frame: approximately 6 months
Phase II Arm 3: Progression Free Survival (PFS) as Per RECIST V1.1
Assessment of the anti-tumor activity of BYL719 in combination with cetuximab in patients resistant to platinum-based therapy and cetuximab.
Time frame: approximately 6 months
Phase Ib: Area Under Curve (AUC) 0-24 for BYL719 by Treatment
Comparison of single-dose exposure of BYL719 dispersible tablet via G-tube in combination with cetuximab in RM HNSCC to that of Arm A (film-coated tables)
Time frame: 6 months
Phase II: Progression Free Survival (PFS) as Per RECIST v 1.1
Phase II, Scheme 1 (Arm 2B): To further assess the anti-tumor activity of BYL719 + cetuximab in the setting of resistance to single agent cetuximab
Time frame: approximately 6 months
Phase Ib: Progression Free Survival (PFS) as Per RECIST v1.1
Assessment of the preliminary anti-tumor activity of BYL719 in combination with cetuximab in arm A, B and C.
Time frame: approximately 6 months
Phase II: Randomized Best Overall Response as Per RECIST v1.1
Scheme 1 (Arms 1 and 2): Further assessment of the anti-tumor activity of BYL719 in combination with cetuximab vs. cetuximab as single-agent in RM HNSCC patients naive to cetuximab
Time frame: approximately 6 months
Phase II: Non-Randomized Best Overall Response as Per RECIST v1.1
Scheme 1 (Arm 3): Further assessment of the anti-tumor activity of BYL719 in combination with cetuximab vs. cetuximab as single-agent in RM HNSCC patients naive to cetuximab
Time frame: approximately 6 months
Phase II: Randomized Overall Response Rate (ORR) and Disease Control Rate (DCR) as Per RECIST v1.1
Assessment of the preliminary anti-tumor activity of BYL719 in combination with cetuximab in arms 1 and 2.
Time frame: approximately 6 months
Phase II: Non-Randomized Overall Response Rate (ORR) and Disease Control Rate (DCR) as Per RECIST v1.1
Scheme 1 (arm 3): Assessment of the preliminary anti-tumor activity of BYL719 in combination with cetuximab in arm 3 (non-randomized arm)
Time frame: approximately 6 months
Phase II: Randomized Overall Survival (OS) by Treatment
Scheme 1 (Arms 1 and 2): Further assessment of the anti-tumor activity of BYL719 in combination with cetuximab vs. cetuximab as single-agent in RM HNSCC patients naive to cetuximab
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Novartis Investigative Site
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Novartis Investigative Site
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Novartis Investigative Site
St Louis, Missouri, United States
Novartis Investigative Site
New York, New York, United States
Novartis Investigative Site
New York, New York, United States
...and 19 more locations
Time frame: approximately 1 year
Phase II: Non-Randomized Overall Survival (OS) by Treatment
Scheme 1 (Arm 3): Further assessment of the anti-tumor activity of BYL719 in combination with cetuximab vs. cetuximab as single-agent in RM HNSCC patients naive to cetuximab
Time frame: approximately 1 year
For Phase Ib: Overall Response Rate (ORR) and Disease Control Rate (DCR) as Per RECIST v1.1
Assessment of the preliminary anti-tumor activity of BYL719 in combination with cetuximab in arm A, B and C CR=complete response PR=partial response
Time frame: approximately 6 months
Phase II, Scheme 1 (Arm 2B): Overall Response Rate (ORR) and Disease Control Rate (DCR) as Per RECIST v1.1
Phase II: Scheme 1 (Arm 2B): To further assess the anti-tumor activity of BYL719 + cetuximab in the setting of resistance to single agent cetuximab. Complete response (CR); Partial response (PR); Stable disease (SD)
Time frame: Approximately 6 months
Phase II, Scheme 2 (Arm 2B): Overall Survival (OS) for the Cross-over
Phase II, Scheme 1 (Arm 2B): To further assess the anti-tumor activity of BYL719 + cetuximab in the setting of resistance to single agent cetuximab.
Time frame: approximately 1 year
Phase Ib: Primary Plasma Pharmacokinetic Parameters for BYL719 by Treatment
Non compartmental PK parameters derived after single dose at Cycle 1 Day 1
Time frame: 1 to 24 hours post dose (Day 1 Cycle 1)
Phase Ib: Cmax for BYL719 by Treatment
Non compartmental Cmax derived after single dose at Cycle 1 Day 1
Time frame: Day 1 Cycle 1
Phase Ib: Tmax for BYL719 by Treatment
Non compartmental Cmax derived after single dose at Cycle 1 Day 1
Time frame: Day 1 Cycle 1
Phase Ib: Plasma Pharmacokinetic Parameters for BYL719 After Continuous Dose Administration (Steady State)
Non compartmental PK parameters derived after single dose at Cycle 1 Day 1
Time frame: Day 1 Cycle 1
Phase Ib: Cmax for BYL719 After Continuous Dose Administration (Steady State)
Non compartmental PK parameters derived after single dose at Cycle 1 Day 1
Time frame: Day 1 Cycle 1
Phase Ib: Tmax for BYL719 After Continuous Dose Administration (Steady State)
Non compartmental PK parameters derived after single dose at Cycle 1 Day 1
Time frame: Day 1 Cycle 1
Phase Ib: Notable Abnormal Vital Signs by Treatment
Characterization of the safety and tolerability of BYL719 in combination with cetuximab in arm A, B and C.
Time frame: approximately 6 months
Phase Ib: Number of Patients With Notable Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities
Characterization of the safety and tolerability of BYL719 in combination with cetuximab in arm A, B and C.
Time frame: baseline, post baseline
For Phase II: Notable Abnormal Vital Signs by Treatment
Characterization of the safety and tolerability of BYL719 in combination with cetuximab in arm 1, 2 and 2B.
Time frame: approximately 6 months
For Phase II: Number of Patients With Notable Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities
Characterization of the safety and tolerability of BYL719 in combination with cetuximab in arm 1, 2 and 2B.
Time frame: baseline, post baseline during the entire study period (approximately 1 year)
Phase II: Progression Free Survival (PFS) Based on Investigator's Assessment With Treatment
Assessment of the anti-tumor activity of BYL719 in combination with cetuximab vs. cetuximab as single-agent in RM HNSCC patients naive to cetuximab
Time frame: approximately 6 months