Subjects who had previously received GW-1000-02 in a GW study who opted to continue using it in the long-term were monitored for ongoing tolerability and evidence of clinical benefit.
Subjects who had previously participated in a placebo controlled GW clinical study were screened and if eligible began dosing with GW-1000-02. Subjects were reviewed for tolerability and evidence of clinical benefit at weeks two and four and then every eight weeks. Subjects self-titrated to symptom resolution or maximum tolerated/allowable dose of 130 mg THC and 120 mg CBD.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
507
Contained delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) (27 mg/ml) and cannabidiol (CBD) (25 mg/ml) as extract of Cannabis sativa L., with peppermint oil, 0.05% (v/v), in ethanol:propylene glycol (50:50) excipient. Each 100 μl actuation of the pump action spray delivered 2.7 mg THC and 2.5 mg CBD. A maximum daily exposure of 130 mg THC was specified by the UK regulatory authority authorisation.
Gartnavel General Hospital
Glasgow, United Kingdom
Incidence of Adverse Events as a Measure of Subject Safety.
Following data entry, all adverse events were medically encoded using the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) 6.0. All subjects who experienced an adverse event during the treatment period is presented.
Time frame: Up to 1051 days
Change From Parent Study Baseline in Spasticity 0-10 Numerical Rating Scale Score After 52 Weeks of Treatment.
Subjects were asked to rate the severity of their primary symptom each week in the diary using an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale, where zero = "best possible" and 10 = "worst possible". A negative value indicates an improvement in score from baseline.
Time frame: 0 - 52 weeks
Change From Parent Study Baseline in Central Neuropathic Pain 0-10 Numerical Rating Scale Score at 52 Weeks of Treatment.
Subjects were asked to rate the severity of their primary symptom each week in the diary using an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale, where zero = "best possible" and 10 = "worst possible". A negative value indicates an improvement in score from baseline.
Time frame: 0 - 52 weeks.
Change From Parent Study Baseline in Neuropathic Pain 0-10 Numerical Rating Scale Score at 52 Weeks of Treatment in Multiple Sclerosis Subjects.
Subjects were asked to rate the severity of their primary symptom each week in the diary using an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale, where zero = "best possible" and 10 = "worst possible". A negative value indicates an improvement in score from baseline.
Time frame: 0 - 52 weeks.
Change From Parent Study Baseline in Pain 0-10 Numerical Rating Scale Score at 52 Weeks of Treatment.
Subjects were asked to rate the severity of their primary symptom each week in the diary using an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale, where zero = "best possible" and 10 = "worst possible". A negative value indicates an improvement in score from baseline.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: 0 - 52 weeks.
Subject Assessment of Benefit at the Last Study Visit in Those Experiencing Neuropathic Pain Due to Multiple Sclerosis.
Assessment of benefit achieved at study completion/withdrawal was evaluated by the subject, and the number of subjects who perceived a benefit from treatment is presented.
Time frame: Up to 1051 days
Investigator Assessment of Benefit at the Last Study Visit in Those Experiencing Neuropathic Pain Due to Multiple Sclerosis.
Assessment of benefit achieved at study completion/withdrawal was evaluated by the investigator, and the number of subjects that investigators considered to have experienced a benefit from the treatment is presented.
Time frame: Up to 1051 days
Subject Assessment of Benefit at the Last Study Visit in Those Experiencing Central Neuropathic Pain.
Assessment of benefit achieved at study completion/withdrawal was evaluated by the subject, and the number of subjects who perceived a benefit from treatment is presented.
Time frame: Up to 1051 days
Investigator Assessment of Benefit at the Last Study Visit in Those Experiencing Central Neuropathic Pain.
Assessment of benefit achieved at study completion/withdrawal was evaluated by the investigator, and the number of subjects that investigators considered to have experienced a benefit from the treatment is presented.
Time frame: Up to 1051days
Subject Assessment of Benefit at the Last Study Visit in Those Experiencing Pain.
Assessment of benefit achieved at study completion/withdrawal was evaluated by the subject, and the number of subjects who perceived a benefit from treatment is presented.
Time frame: Up to 1051
Investigator Assessment of Benefit at the Last Study Visit in Those Experiencing Pain.
Assessment of benefit achieved at study completion/withdrawal was evaluated by the investigator, and the number of subjects that investigators considered to have experienced a benefit from the treatment is presented.
Time frame: Up to 1051 days
Subject Assessment of Benefit at the Last Study Visit in All Multiple Sclerosis Subjects.
Assessment of benefit achieved at study completion/withdrawal was evaluated by the subject, and the number of subjects who perceived a benefit from treatment is presented.
Time frame: Up to 1051 days
Investigator Assessment of Benefit at the Last Study Visit in All Multiple Sclerosis Subjects.
Assessment of benefit achieved at study completion/withdrawal was evaluated by the investigator, and the number of subjects that investigators considered to have experienced a benefit from the treatment is presented.
Time frame: Up to 1051 days.
Investigator Global Assessment at the Last Study Visit in Subjects With Neuropathic Pain Due to Multiple Sclerosis.
Investigators rated the global severity of the subject's underlying primary condition, e.g. their MS or spinal cord injury, since the previous visit using a five point scale of "much worse", "worse", "no change", "better", "much better". The number of subjects rated by the investigator as "better" or "much better" at the last study visit is presented.
Time frame: Up to 1051 days
Investigator Global Assessment at the Last Study Visit in Subjects With Central Neuropathic Pain.
Investigators rated the global severity of the subject's underlying primary condition, e.g. their MS or spinal cord injury, since the previous visit using a five point scale of "much worse", "worse", "no change", "better", "much better". The number of subjects rated by the investigator as "better" or "much better" at the last study visit is presented.
Time frame: Up to 1051 days.
Investigator Global Assessment at the Last Study Visit in Subjects With Pain.
Investigators rated the global severity of the subject's underlying primary condition, e.g. their MS or spinal cord injury, since the previous visit using a five point scale of "much worse", "worse", "no change", "better", "much better". The number of subjects rated by the investigator as "better" or "much better" at the last study visit is presented.
Time frame: Up to 1051 days.
Investigator Global Assessment at the Last Study Visit in Subjects With Multiple Sclerosis.
Investigators rated the global severity of the subject's underlying primary condition, e.g. their MS or spinal cord injury, since the previous visit using a five point scale of "much worse", "worse", "no change", "better", "much better". The number of subjects rated by the investigator as "better" or "much better" at the last study visit is presented.
Time frame: Up to 1051 days.