Sorafenib and pazopanib are both effective and promising treatments for advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC). Both drugs are registered for this indication. No prospective comparative data in advanced RCC (or other indications) have been published. A search in the clinicaltrials.gov database did not reveal any planned or ongoing studies. As sequential therapy is now the standard of treatment for advanced RCC it is important to evaluate in clinical trials what the value of different sequential strategies is. This needs to be done every time new agents are introduced into the treatment armamentarium. As there are no data yet on the sequential use of sorafenib followed by pazopanib or vice versa, this sequence, however, will most certainly be used in daily practice, it is required to examine efficacy and safety of this sequential approach in a clinical trial in a randomized setting. Therefore, the investigators have designed an open randomized study in patients not previously treated for advanced RCC. Suitable patients will be randomized (1:1) in 2 groups.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
544
Sorafenib (first-line) followed by Pazopanib (second-line)
Pazopanib (first-line) followed by Sorafenib (second-line)
Medizinische Universität Innsbruck
Innsbruck, Austria
A. ö. Bezirkskrankenhaus Kufstein
Kufstein, Austria
AKH Linz GmbH
Linz, Austria
LKH Salzburg
Salzburg, Austria
Universitätsklinikum Aachen, Urologische Klinik
Aachen, Germany
Gesundheitszentrum St. Marien GmbH
To evaluate if progression-free survival from randomization to progression or death during second-line therapy (Total PFS) of sorafenib followed by pazopanib is non-inferior compared to pazopanib followed by sorafenib.
Time frame: 4 years
Time from randomization to progression during second-line therapy (total TTP)
Time frame: 1 year
Time to first-line treatment failure (progression, death, discontinuation due to toxicity) descriptively in each arm
Time frame: 1 year
PFS in first-line and second-line treatment, descriptively
Time frame: 4 years
Overall survival, descriptively (data cut-off same as for primary endpoint
Time frame: 4 years
Disease Control Rate (DCR); Response rates in first-line and in second-line (CR, PR, SD according to RECIST criteria)
Time frame: 4 years
Health-related Quality of Life (FACIT-F, FKSI-10)
Time frame: 4 years
Biomarker programme
Circulating tumor cells, Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms, Serum Protein Signatures
Time frame: 4 years
Safety and tolerability
Monitoring of adverse events, summaries and listings of adverse events
Time frame: 4 years
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Amberg, Germany
Praxis für Urologie
Berlin, Germany
Charite Campus Virchow Klinikum / Klein. Für Innere Med / Onkologie/Hämatologie
Berlin, Germany
Gemeinschaftspraxis Pott / Tirier / Hannig - Onkologie
Bottrop, Germany
Urologie im Schlosscarrée Braunschweig
Braunschweig, Germany
...and 62 more locations