The primary objective of this study is to compare the efficacy of intranasal administration of 100, 200, and 400 μg of fluticasone propionate twice a day delivered by the OptiNose device with placebo in subjects with bilateral nasal polyposis. Two co-primary endpoints will be used in the study: reduction of nasal congestion/obstruction symptoms at the end of Week 4 of the double-blind treatment phase measured by the 7 day average instantaneous AM diary symptom scores, and reduction in total polyp grade (sum of scores from both nasal cavities) over the 16 weeks of the double-blind treatment phase as determined by the Lildholdt scale score measured by nasoendoscopy.
This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicenter study designed to assess the efficacy and safety of intranasal administration of 3 doses of OPN-375 (100, 200, and 400 µg bid) in subjects with bilateral nasal polyposis and nasal congestion. This study consisted of 3 phases. After signing informed consent, subjects who met eligibility criteria at Visit 1 (screening) entered the study. 1. Pretreatment phase (single-blind, placebo, run-in): 7 to up to 14 days duration, to determine disease status eligibility and to ensure the subject was able to comply with study procedures prior to randomization and enrolment in the double-blind treatment phase. 2. Double-blind treatment phase: 16 weeks duration with 6 scheduled visits starting with Visit 2, Day 1 (baseline) when eligible subjects were randomized by balance allocation to 1 of 4 treatment groups and ending at Visit 7 (Week 16). 3. Open-label extension phase: 8 weeks duration with 1 scheduled visit (Visit 8 \[Week 24\]).
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
323
Delivered via Optinose Exhalation Delivery System
SC Clinical Research, Inc.
Tucson, Arizona, United States
Kern Allergy and Medical Research, Inc.
Bakersfield, California, United States
Central California Clinical Research
Fresno, California, United States
Allergy & Asthma Specialists Medical Group
Huntington Beach, California, United States
California Allergy & Asthma Medical Group, Inc.
Los Angeles, California, United States
Change in 7-day Average Instantaneous Morning Diary Congestion/Obstruction Symptoms
Subjects reported nasal symptoms using the electronic diary twice daily immediately before dosing. 0: None 1. Mild, symptoms clearly present, but minimal awareness, and easily tolerated 2. Moderate, definite awareness of symptoms that is bothersome but tolerable 3. Severe, symptoms that are hard to tolerate, cause interference with activities or daily living The change from baseline in instantaneous morning diary symptom scores averaged over 7 days prior to the Week 4 Visit of the double-blind treatment phase
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4 of the double-blind treatment phase
Change in Total Polyp Grade
Polyp grading of each nasal cavity was determined by a nasal polyp grading scale score measured by nasoendoscopy. A summary of the changes from baseline to Week 16 in total polyp grade. 0: No polyps 1. Mild polyposis: polyps not reaching below the inferior border of the middle turbinate 2. Moderate polyposis: polyps reaching below the inferior border of the middle concha, but not the inferior border of the inferior turbinate 3. Severe polyposis large polyps reaching below the lower inferior border of the inferior turbinate Reduction in total polyp grade (sum of scores from both nasal cavities) at Week 16 of double-blind treatment phase; Included patients with nasal polyps at baseline
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16 of the double-blind treatment phase
Congestion/Obstruction Scores (7-day Instantaneous Morning)
Subjects reported nasal symptoms using the electronic diary twice daily immediately before dosing. 0: None 1. Mild, symptoms clearly present, but minimal awareness, and easily tolerated 2. Moderate, definite awareness of symptoms that is bothersome but tolerable 3. Severe, symptoms that are hard to tolerate, cause interference with activities or daily living The change from baseline in instantaneous morning diary symptom scores averaged over 7 days prior to the Week 16 Visit of the double-blind treatment phase
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16 of the double-blind treatment phase
Change in Rhinorrhea Score (7-day Instantaneous Morning)
Subjects reported nasal symptoms using the electronic diary twice daily immediately before dosing. 0: None 1. Mild, symptoms clearly present, but minimal awareness, and easily tolerated 2. Moderate, definite awareness of symptoms that is bothersome but tolerable 3. Severe, symptoms that are hard to tolerate, cause interference with activities or daily living The change from baseline in instantaneous morning diary symptom scores averaged over 7 days prior to the Week 16 Visit of the double-blind treatment phase
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16 of the double-blind treatment phase
Facial Pain or Pressure Score (7-day Instantaneous Morning)
Subjects reported nasal symptoms using the electronic diary twice daily immediately before dosing. 0: None 1. Mild, symptoms clearly present, but minimal awareness, and easily tolerated 2. Moderate, definite awareness of symptoms that is bothersome but tolerable 3. Severe, symptoms that are hard to tolerate, cause interference with activities or daily living The change from baseline in instantaneous morning diary symptom scores averaged over 7 days prior to the Week 16 Visit of the double-blind treatment phase
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16 of the double-blind treatment phase
Hyposmia Score (7-day Instantaneous Morning)
Subjects reported nasal symptoms using the electronic diary twice daily immediately before dosing. 0: None 1. Mild, symptoms clearly present, but minimal awareness, and easily tolerated 2. Moderate, definite awareness of symptoms that is bothersome but tolerable 3. Severe, symptoms that are hard to tolerate, cause interference with activities or daily living The change from baseline in instantaneous morning diary symptom scores averaged over 7 days prior to the Week 16 Visit of the double-blind treatment phase
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16 of the double-blind treatment phase
Sinonasal Outcome Test 22 (SNOT-22) Total Score
SNOT-22 is a subject-completed questionnaire that consists of 22 questions. The questions on the SNOT-22 efficacy evaluation were used to calculate a total score. 22 questions are divided among 4 subscales: Rhinologic (7 questions), Ear/Facial Symptoms (4 questions), Sleep Function (3 questions), and Psychological Issues (6 questions). Each item was rated on the 5-point scale. The total score can range from 0-110, 0 being the best and 110 being the worst. 0: No problem 1. Very mild problem 2. Mild or slight problem 3. Moderate problem 4. Severe problem 5. Problem as bad as it can be
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16 of the double-blind treatment phase, Week 24 of the end of open-label treatment phase
MOS Sleep-R Score
The MOS Sleep-R is a brief, self-administered, validated questionnaire designed to measure key aspects of sleep, such as disturbance, adequacy, somnolence, and quantity. The 12-item version with a 4-week recall was used in this study. The score range for the 12-item version is 0 to 100, lower scores indicating better sleep and higher scores indicating worse sleep. The scale yields a Sleep Problem Index and scores on the following 6 subscales: Sleep Disturbance, Snoring, Shortness of Breath or Headache, Sleep Adequacy, Sleep Somnolence, and Sleep Quantity.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16 of the double-blind treatment phase
Rhinosinusitis Disability Index (RSDI) Total Score
The RSDI is a subject-completed instrument that evaluates the self-perceived impact of disease specific head and neck disorders. The RSDI has 30 items in 3 domains: Physical (11 items), Functional (9 items), and Emotional (10 items). The RSDI scale ranges from 0-120, 0 being better quality of life and less impact of CRS on daily function and 120 being worse quality of life and more impact of CRS on daily function.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16 of the double-blind treatment phase
SF-36v2 - Mental Component
The SF-36v2 is a multipurpose, scaled, 36-item, subject-completed validated questionnaire that measures 8 domains of health: limitations in physical activities, limitations in social activities, limitations in usual role activities, bodily pain, general mental health, limitations in usual role activities, vitality, and general health. It yields scale scores for each of the 8 health domains, and 2 summary measures of physical and mental health. Each scale range is from 0-100. A lower score means more disability and a higher score means less disability.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16 of the double-blind treatment phase, Week 24 of the end of open-label treatment phase
SF-36v2 - Physical Component
The SF-36v2 is a multipurpose, scaled, 36-item, subject-completed validated questionnaire that measures 8 domains of health: limitations in physical activities, limitations in social activities, limitations in usual role activities, bodily pain, general mental health, limitations in usual role activities, vitality, and general health perceptions. It yields scale scores for each of the 8 health domains, and 2 summary measures of physical and mental health. Each scale range is from 0-100. A lower score means more disability and a higher score means less disability.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16 of the double-blind treatment phase, Week 24 of the end of open-label treatment phase
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Score
Subject responses to the question: "Since starting the study drug, how would you rate the change in your symptoms?" Percentage includes patients who scored either "very much improved," "much improved," or "minimally improved."
Time frame: Week 16 of the double-blind treatment phase, Week 24 of the end of open-label treatment phase
Peak Nasal Inspiratory Flow (PNIF)
The PNIF is an assessment of nasal passage obstruction and was measured using an In-Check portable nasal inspiratory flow meter. To measure PNIF, a mask was placed over the nose during inspiration and inspiratory flow was recorded. Each subject inhaled 3 times and each measurement was recorded. The PNIF value used was the greatest of the 3 results at each time point.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16 of the double-blind treatment phase, Week 24 of the open-label treatment phase
Polyp Grade of 0 in at Least One Nostril
Polyp grading of each nasal cavity was determined by a nasal polyp grading scale score measured by nasoendoscopy. This outcome measured how many patients with a polyp grad of 0 in at least 1 nostril. 0: No polyps 1. Mild polyposis: polyps not reaching below the inferior border of the middle turbinate 2. Moderate polyposis: polyps reaching below the inferior border of the middle concha, but not the inferior border of the inferior turbinate 3. Severe polyposis large polyps reaching below the lower inferior border of the inferior turbinate
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16 of the double-blind treatment phase, Week 24 of the end of open-label treatment phase
Nasal Polyp Surgery Eligilbilty
A subject was considered eligible for surgical intervention if the following conditions were met: * Subject has had moderate symptoms of congestion from nasal polyposis for ≥ 3 months. * Subject continues to suffer from at least moderate symptoms despite use of topical steroids at conventional doses for ≥ 6 weeks. * Subject continues to suffer from at least moderate symptoms despite use (or previous use) of saline lavage for ≥ 6 weeks. * Subject has endoscopically visualized bilateral nasal polyposis of at least moderate severity (nasal polyp grading score ≥ 2 in at least 1 nostril).
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16 of the double-blind treatment phase, Week 24 of the open-label extension phase
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Choc PSF, AMC, Division of AA & I
Orange, California, United States
California Allergy and Asthma Palmdale
Palmdale, California, United States
Peninsula Research Associates, Inc.
Rolling Hills Estates, California, United States
California Medical Clinic for Headache
Santa Monica, California, United States
Asthma & Allergy Associates, P.C.
Colorado Springs, Colorado, United States
...and 23 more locations