This is an open-label, multicenter study designed to assess the safety of intranasal administration of 400 μg of fluticasone propionate twice a day delivered by the OptiNose device in subjects with chronic sinusitis with or without nasal polyps. The study consists of an up-to-7-day pretreatment phase followed a 12-month open-label treatment phase. The duration of each subject's participation is approximately 53 weeks.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
223
Using Optinose Exhalation Delivery System
Achieve Clinical Research
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
PAB Clinical Research
Brandon, Florida, United States
Adverse Events
Patients with at least one Adverse Events
Time frame: 12 Months
Sinonasal Outcome Test 22 (SNOT-22) Total Score
Change from baseline to Month 3 \& Month 12 in SNOT-22 Total Score SNOT-22 is validated in large populations with chronic sinusitis with and without nasal polyps. The 22 questions are used to calculate a total score (the sum of all items) and 4 subscale scores. The 22 questions are divided among 4 subscales: Rhinologic, Ear and Facial Symptoms, Sleep Function, and Psychological Issues subscales. The total score can range from 0-110, 0 being the best and 110 being the worst. 0: No problem 1. Very mild problem 2. Mild or slight problem 3. Moderate problem 4. Severe problem 5. Problem as bad as it can be
Time frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 12
Lund-Mackay Total Score
Change from baseline to Month 3, Month 12, in Lund-Mackay Total Score Lund-Mackay Assessment of nasal cavity appearance, via nasoendoscopy, used to evaluate signs of edema, discharge, crusting, scarring/adhesions, and nasal polyps, with each sign rated on a 0 to 2 scale 0: None 2: Worse outcome
Time frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 12
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)
The PGIC took less than 1 minute to complete. Subjects answered question, "Since starting the study drug, how would you rate the change in your symptoms?" Patients may answer very much improved, much improved, minimally improved, no change, minimally worse, much worse, or very much worse. Data listed below reports the total number of patients who answered very much improved, much improved, or minimally improved at the specified time.
Time frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 12
Summed Bilateral Nasal Polyp Grading Scale Score
In subjects with nasal polyps, polyp grading of each nasal cavity was determined by a nasal polyp grading scale score measured by nasoendoscopy. 0: No polyps 1. Mild polyposis: polyps not reaching below the inferior of the middle turbinate 2. Moderate polyposis: polyps reaching below the inferior border of the middle concha, but not the inferior border of the inferior turbinate 3. Severe polyposis: large polyps reaching below the lower inferior border of the inferior turbinate
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Sneeze Wheeze and Itch Associates
Normal, Illinois, United States
Professional Research Network of Kansas
Wichita, Kansas, United States
Best Clinical Trials
New Orleans, Louisiana, United States
PMG Research of Winston Salem
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States
HCCA Clinical Research Solutions
Middleburg Heights, Ohio, United States
Allergy and Asthma Research Group
Eugene, Oregon, United States
Clinical Research Solutions
Franklin, Tennessee, United States
William Blake Partners
Grapevine, Texas, United States
...and 6 more locations
Time frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 12
Nasal Polyp Surgery Eligibility
Time frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 12