The aims of the study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of early introduction one month post-transplantation of everolimus associated to EC-MPS with tacrolimus discontinuation in de novo liver transplant recipients and to evaluate if it leads to a better renal function 6 month post-transplantation compared to standard treatment associating tacrolimus and EC-MPS. The renal function was estimated by glomerular filtration rate.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
188
Arm 1 : tacrolimus (C0 6-10 ng/ml) from D3-D5 post-transplantation to month 6 post-transplantation. Arm 2 : tacolimus (C0 6-10 ng/ml) from D3-D5 post-transplantation to 16 weeks post-transplantation at the latest.
Arm 1: no everolimus Arm 2: everolimus (C0 6-10 ng/ml) from randomization to month 6 post-transplantation
Basiliximab was supplied to the participating centers as marketed, i.e. in packs containing one vial of 20-mg powder, and water for injection (WFI). 20 mg at D0 and D4
Dose of 1440 mg/day from transplantation to month 6 post- transplantation
Administration of oral corticosteroid therapy was at the discretion of the centers according to their usual practice
Novartis Investigative Site
Besançon, France
Novartis Investigative Site
Bordeaux, France
Novartis Investigative Site
Chambray-lès-Tours, France
Novartis Investigative Site
Clichy, France
Novartis Investigative Site
Créteil, France
Novartis Investigative Site
Grenoble, France
Novartis Investigative Site
Lille, France
Novartis Investigative Site
Marseille, France
Novartis Investigative Site
Montpellier, France
Novartis Investigative Site
Nice, France
...and 4 more locations
Change From Baseline (Randomization) in Renal Function
Change in renal function was measured by change in glomerular filtration rate (GFR). GFR calculated using the abbreviated modification of diet in renal disease (aMDRD) formula. GFR in mL/min/1.73m\^2 for men of non-black ethnicity: 186 \* \[C/88\]\^-1.154 \* \[A\]\^-0.023\*G\*R ; C = serum creatinine (in μmol/L); A = Age (in years). G = 0.742 when the patient is a women; Otherwise G=1 R= 1.21 when the patient was of black ethnicity; Otherwise R = 1 Baseline was Day 28 visit.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
Number of Patients With Treatment Failures
Incidence of treatment failures, assessed with composite criterion including treated biopsy proven acute rejection (tBPAR) with a rejection activity index (RAI) according to Banff classification \>3, graft loss or death at 6 months. Biopsy proven acute rejection (BPAR) was defined as a clinically suspected acute rejection confirmed by biopsy. The Banff Rejection Activity Index (RAI) comprises 3 components scored from 0 to 3: venous endothelial inflammation; bile duct inflammation damage; and portal inflammation; the scores are combined to an overall score (the RAI) ranging from 0 to 9. An overall score of 0-3 is considered indeterminate, score of 4-5 is mild acute, score of 6-7 is moderate acute , and score of 8-9 is severe acute. Only the episode with the highest total RAI score for each participant was counted. The graft was presumed to be lost on the day the patient was registered again on the waiting list, or the day he/she received a new graft.
Time frame: At week 12 and week 24
Number of Patients With Treated or Not Treated Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR)
Biopsy proven acute rejection was defined as a clinically suspected acute rejection confirmed by biopsy.
Time frame: at 12 week and 24 week
Number of Patients Reported With Different Categories of Severity of BPAR According to Banff Classification
Biopsy proven acute rejection was defined as a clinically suspected acute rejection confirmed by biopsy. The severity of BPAR was categorized as : Mild (Banff grade I, RAI = 4 and 5) Moderate (Banff grade II, RAI = 6 and 7) Severe (Banff grade III, RAI = 8 and 9) Banff Rejection Activity Index (RAI) comprises 3 components scored from 0 to 3: venous endothelial inflammation; bile duct inflammation damage; and portal inflammation; the scores are combined to an overall score (the RAI) ranging from 0 to 9. An overall score of 0-3 is considered indeterminate, score of 4-5 is mild acute, score of 6-7 is moderate acute , and score of 8-9 is severe acute. Only the episode with the highest total RAI score for each participant was counted.
Time frame: at 12 week and 24 week
Number of Patients With Treated or Untreated BPAR With RAI Score Greater Than 3
Biopsy proven acute rejection (BPAR) was defined as a clinically suspected acute rejection confirmed by biopsy. The Banff Rejection Activity Index (RAI) comprises 3 components scored from 0 to 3: venous endothelial inflammation; bile duct inflammation damage; and portal inflammation; the scores are combined to an overall score (the RAI) ranging from 0 to 9. An overall score of 0-3 is considered indeterminate, score of 4-5 is mild acute, score of 6-7 is moderate acute , and score of 8-9 is severe acute. Only the episode with the highest total RAI score for each participant was counted. The patients with treated or untreated BPAR having RAI score \> 3 were reported in this end point.
Time frame: At 24 weeks
Number of Patients With Death or Graft Loss
The graft was presumed to be lost on the day the patient was registered again on the waiting list, or the day he/she received a new graft.
Time frame: at week 24
Change From Baseline (Randomization) in Serum Creatinine
Change in serum creatinine concentrations from baseline (randomization) to week 24 post-randomization was one of the efficacy assessments of renal function. Baseline was Day 28 visit.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
Change From Baseline (Randomization) in Urine Protein/Creatinine Ratio
Change in urine protein/creatinine ratio from baseline (randomization) to week 24 post-randomization was one of the efficacy assessments of renal function. Baseline was Day 28 visit.
Time frame: Baseline, week 24
Change From Baseline (Randomization) in Creatinine Clearance Estimated Using the Adjusted Cockcroft-Gault Formula
Creatinine clearance by the Cockcroft-Gault formula is computed in mL/min/1.73m\^2 from the creatinine clearance in mL/min by multiplying it by 1.73 and dividing it by the body surface area Baseline was Day 28 visit.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
Change From Baseline (Randomization) in Glomerular Filtration Rate Estimated by Abbreviated Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) Formula
Change in glomerular filtration rate was calculated using the MDRD abbreviated formula. GFR in mL/min/1.73m\^2 for men of non-black ethnicity: 186 \* \[C/88\]\^-1.154 \* \[A\]\^-0.023\*G\*R ; C = serum creatinine (in μmol/L); A = Age (in years). G = 0.742 when the patient is a women; Otherwise G=1 R= 1.21 when the patient was of black ethnicity; Otherwise R = 1 Baseline was Day 28 visit.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
Change From Baseline (Randomization) in Glomerular Filtration Rate Estimated by CKD-EPI Formula
GFR estimated by using the Chronic kidney disease- epidemiology (CKD-EPI) formula: eGFR (mL/min/1.73m\^2) = 141 \* min(C/K,1)\^ α \* max(C/K,1)\^-1.209 \* 0.993\^A \* 1.1018 (if male) \* 1.159 (if black) where C = serum creatinine (in mg/dL) ; A = Age (in years); K = 0.7 for women and 0.9 for men; α = -0.329 for women and -0.411 for men. Baseline was Day 28 visit.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
Number of Patients in Different Stages of Chronic Kidney Diseases According to the K/DOQI Classification System
Kidney disease outcomes quality initiative (K/DOQI) classification is based on glomerular filtration rate (GFR), abbreviated MDRD formula (mL/min/1.73m\^2) : Stage 1 : GFR \>= 90; Stage 2 = GFR was between 60-89; Stage 3 = GFR was between 30-59 ; Stage 4 = GFR was between 15-29; Stage 5 = GFR was \< 15 (or dialysis)
Time frame: At Week 24
Number of Patients With Any Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Events, Death and Premature Discontinuation
Baseline was Day 28 visit. This endpoint reports patients with total adverse events (any), serious adverse events, death and premature discontinuation.
Time frame: Baseline to 24 weeks
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.