To evaluate efficacy and safety of a combined oral contraceptive of estradiol valerate and dienogest in the treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
339
2 days of 3 mg estradiol valerate (EV);5 days of 2 mg EV + 2 mg dienogest (DNG);17 days of 2 mg EV + 3 mg DNG;2 days of 1 mg EV;2 days of placebo. A blister card consists of 28 pills, taken orally once a day for 7 cycles of 28 days each.
Matching placebo to be taken orally daily for 7 cycles of 28 days each.
Unnamed facility
Absolute change in Menstrual Blood Loss (MBL) at baseline and 90 days
Time frame: 90 day baseline period and 90 days during treatment period
Proportion of subjects with successful treatment
Successful treatment is defined as no bleeding episode with MBL of 80 mL or more and a decrease to a value \</=50% of MBL compared to 90 day run-in period
Time frame: 90 days during treatment phase
Percent change of MBL at baseline and 90 day period during treatment phase
Time frame: Baseline and 90 days during treatment phase
Absolute change of average MBL at baseline and up to cycle 7 (one cycle = 28 days)
Time frame: Baseline and cycle 1, cycle 2, cycle 3, cycle 4, cycle 5, cycle 6, cycle 7
Proportion of subjects with improvement in the investigator's global assessment scale on Day 84
Investigator's global assessment scale: 0 = not assessed; 1 = very much improved; 2 = much improved; 3 = improved; 4 = no change; 5 = worse; 6 = much worse; 7 = very much worse; Improvement is defined as the assessment score = 1, 2, or 3.
Time frame: Treatment day 84
Proportion of subjects with improvement in the investigator's global assessment scale on Day 196
Investigator's global assessment scale: 0 = not assessed; 1 = very much improved; 2 = much improved; 3 = improved; 4 = no change; 5 = worse; 6 = much worse; 7 = very much worse; Improvement is defined as the assessment score = 1, 2, or 3.
Time frame: Treatment day 196
Proportion of subjects with improvement in the subject's global assessment scale on Day 84
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
Unnamed facility
Nanning, Guangxi, China
Unnamed facility
Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China
Unnamed facility
Wuhan, Hubei, China
Unnamed facility
Wuhan, Hubei, China
Unnamed facility
Changsha, Hunan, China
Unnamed facility
Hengyang, Hunan, China
Unnamed facility
Dalian, Liaoning, China
Unnamed facility
Shenyang, Liaoning, China
Unnamed facility
Xi'an, Shaanxi, China
...and 31 more locations
Subject's global assessment scale: 0 = not assessed; 1 = very much improved; 2 = much improved; 3 = improved; 4 = no change; 5 = worse; 6 = much worse; 7 = very much worse; Improvement is defined as the assessment score = 1, 2, or 3.
Time frame: Treatment day 84
Proportion of subjects with improvement in the subject's global assessment scale on Day 196
Subject's global assessment scale: 0 = not assessed; 1 = very much improved; 2 = much improved; 3 = improved; 4 = no change; 5 = worse; 6 = much worse; 7 = very much worse; Improvement is defined as the assessment score = 1, 2, or 3.
Time frame: Treatment day 196
Number of participants with adverse events as a measure of safety and tolerability
Time frame: Up to 12 months