The purpose of the present study is to determine: 1) the efficacy of 2 periodontal surgical procedures, the conservative simplified papilla preservation technique and the more resective open flap debridement with osseous recontouring, in the treatment of chronic periodontitis in terms of clinical, radiographic, microbiological, immunological and PROMs, comparing them to non-surgical subgingival debridement and 2) if possible, determine the surgical procedure which leads to pocket elimination or to the lowest number of residual pockets.
Periodontal diseases (PD) are highly prevalent chronic diseases, and may be associated with loss of gum and bone tissue surrounding the tooth. Among adults (with 2 or more teeth remaining) in England, 54% experienced gum bleeding and 45% had periodontal (gum) disease of which 9% was severe. Bacterial in origin, the high prevalence of PD, together with increased retention of teeth at older ages, has considerable implications for the population's future treatment needs and the associated costs to the health system. It is therefore important to ensure interventions delivered are those proven to be most efficient and cost effective. The investigators study question will therefore be, "In an adult population with moderate to severe chronic periodontitis, how will 3 different treatment approaches; simplified papilla preservation flap (SPPF), resective periodontal flap with osseous recontouring (RPFO) and subgingival debridement (SD), differ in regard to healing and resolution of disease, patient reported outcomes and cost effectiveness?" The aim of this study is to find the most efficient way to treat chronic periodontitis, through a multi-centre randomised, single-blind, parallel- surgical modalities groups (3 groups) clinical trial including 3 sites:: 1. QMUL Institute of Dentistry, Centre for Oral Clinical Research (COCR) as the new sponsor and coordinating centre including overarching custodian responsibilities for samples and data collected. 2. Barts Health NHS Trust Dental Hospital where the trial different surgical modalities will take place going forward for all new patients recruited. 3. UCL Eastman Dental Institute where patients already recruited and completed the trial surgical phase will complete their follow up. A sufficient number of adults (29 per group) presenting; a total of 87 patients with chronic periodontitis and meeting the necessary inclusion and exclusion criteria will be entered into the trial. Subjects will present to the clinical site for initial screening and enrolment (Baseline Visit). Following enrolment, all participants will attend one visit as preparation for the subsequent study treatments. As part of this session, participants will review how to perform efficient self-care regimes at home to remove plaque biofilm accumulations on a regular basis. At this appointment, they will be randomised to their assigned treatment group and the pending treatment will be discussed with them. Treatment groups will consist of simplified papilla preservation flap (SPPF), resective periodontal flap surgery with osseous recontouring (RPFO), or non-surgical subgingival debridement with local anaesthesia (SD). Treatment will take place within 4 weeks of this preparation visit. Participants will then attend for follow-up visits at 1, 2, 3 and 4 weeks post treatment for evaluation of healing, reinforcement of oral hygiene regime, and supra-gingival scale and polish as required. Clinical measurements will be recorded again at 3, 6 and 12 months post treatment. Radiographs will be taken at baseline, and 12 months post treatment. A saliva and plaque sample will be taken at baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months post treatment. GCF will be taken at baseline, 2 weeks and 3 months post treatment. Patient reported outcomes will be evaluated at baseline, 1 week, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months post treatment. Use of NHS and private dental and health services will be collected via self-reported patient diaries distributed at the first intervention appointment, and 3, 6 and 9 months post intervention. Supportive periodontal maintenance visits will be carried out every 3 months for the duration of the study to maintain optimal oral health through monitoring of oral hygiene routine and supra and subgingival scaling and polish as required. A dental prophylaxis will be performed at the end of the study and the study termination form will be completed.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
36
SD is a conservative non-surgical procedure aimed at reducing dental plaque and calculus from the tooth root usually under local anaesthesia.
The simplified papilla preservation flap is a novel conservative surgical procedure aimed at the preservation of the tissues between the teeth. It has been shown to significantly reduce pocket depth and has faster re-vascularisation of the flap, when compared with other procedures.
RPFO is a surgical procedure that involves the resection of soft and hard tissue to obtain optimum tissue architecture and pocket reduction or elimination.
Barts Health NHS Trust Dental Hospital
London, United Kingdom
Centre for Oral Clinical Research
London, United Kingdom
Eastman Clinical Investigation Centre
London, United Kingdom
Clinical efficacy of 3 different periodontal treatment approaches
A clinical measure of resolution of disease from baseline in Periodontal Probing Depths (PPD)
Time frame: 3, 6 and 12 months
Change from Baseline of EuroQol-5D-5L and Condition Specific Oral Impacts on Daily Performance Questionnaire
To assess impact on quality of life.
Time frame: Baseline, 1 week post-op, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months
To investigate the efficacy of 3 different periodontal treatment approaches on PROMs related to general health over a follow-up period of 12 months
To assess impact on general health
Time frame: Treatment Visit 1, 3, 6 and 9 months
Incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year gained
To determine cost-effectiveness from an NHS perspective
Time frame: 3, 6, 9 and 12 months
Maintenance/support needs of patients following treatment
Measurement of effectiveness of study different treatments
Time frame: 3, 6 and 12 months
Radiographic bone changes of 3 different periodontal treatment approaches
Linear measurements obtained from standardized peri-apical radiographs
Time frame: Baseline and 12 months
Changes in subgingival microbiota
Assessed via pooled samples and analyzed via Illumina Miseq sequencer
Time frame: Baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
To investigate changes from baseline in saliva inflammatory biomarkers and protein expression
Proteomic analysis of saliva with LC/MS (liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry)
Time frame: Baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months
Facial changes in post-operative swelling and oedema
Measurement with 3D imaging technique at different time points following the different periodontal treatments
Time frame: Right before treatment, 1 week and 2 weeks post-operatively
To identify the preferred intervention for subgroups of patients based on severity of disease at presentation to secondary care
Assess patient's preference of treatment modality
Time frame: Treatment Visit 1, 3, 6 and 9 months
To explore whether outcomes measured at 3 months are sufficiently robust predictors of long-term outcome to be useful in patient management and for monitoring in a timely manner the outcomes being achieved in secondary care
Time frame: 3 months and 12 months