The objectives of this study are to compare directly conventional balloon angioplasty alone versus. balloon angioplasty with routine stenting - that is, to determine whether angioplasty with self-expanding stent is superior to conventional balloon angioplasty - in the infrapopliteal arterial occlusive lesions of critical limb ischemia patients by collecting and analyzing the cases of each patient group in a prospective multicenter randomized clinical trial, and to clarify main factors affecting mid- and long-term clinical effects of angioplasty with self-expanding stent in the infrapopliteal arteries. Hypothesis: Balloon PTA followed by routine stenting with self-expanding nitinol stent in critical limb ischemia patients with infrapopliteal arterial occlusive lesions is superior to conventional PTA in the aspect of vascular restenosis rate.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
122
A group of patients who will undergo subsequent primary stenting following successful conventional balloon angioplasty
A group of patients who will undergo routine conventional balloon angioplasty alone without stenting
Korea University Guro Hospital
Seoul, South Korea
Angiographic binary restenosis rate
Time frame: 12 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.