Background: * Achromatopsia is an inherited condition that causes vision loss because cells in the retina do not work properly. It causes loss of acuity, sensitivity to light, and loss of color vision. There are no effective treatments for achromatopsia. * Four genes currently are known to cause achromatopsia. One of these, the cyclic nucleotide-gated channel beta 3 (CNGB3) gene, is the cause in about 50 percent of people. * CNTF is a natural chemical found in the body that promotes survival and function of nerve cells. CNTF has been shown to be effective in treating retinal disease in animals and can slow vision loss. * CNTF has also been studied in over 250 people with retinal disease other than achromatopsia. In these studies, a CNTF implant was placed into the eye during a simple surgery. The implant releases CNTF inside the eye, near the retina. These studies suggested that a CNTF implant might help vision in some eye diseases. Objectives: * To learn whether a CNTF implant is safe for people with CNGB3 achromatopsia. * To learn whether CNTF can improve visual acuity or color vision, and whether it may reduce sensitivity to light in people with CNGB3 achromatopsia. Eligibility: You may be able to take part in this study if you: * Are at least 18 years old. * Test positive for mutations in the CNGB3 gene and have no mutations in another achromatopsia gene. * Have 20/100 vision or worse in at least one eye. * Are not pregnant or nursing. Design: * To determine if you can take part, we will ask about your medical history and do a physical examination and an eye examination. Blood and urine samples will be taken. * This study requires 11 visits to the National Eye Institute over 3 years. * One visit will be for the implant surgery. The implant will be placed in one eye only. * Study visits will take place 1 day after implant surgery, and again 1 week later and 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 1.5 years and 3 years later. These visits will help us evaluate the safety and benefit of the implant on your eye. * At the 3 year visit, you can choose to keep the CNTF implant in your eye, or you can have us remove it.
Objective: The objective of this study is to evaluate the safety of ocular NT-501 device with encapsulated NT-201 cells releasing Ciliary Neurotrophic Factor (CNTF) to the retina of participants affected with CNGB3 achromatopsia. Study Population: Five participants affected with CNGB3 achromatopsia will be enrolled, with one eye treated per participant. Design: This is a Phase I/II, prospective, single-center study. One eye of each participant will receive a vitreous NT-501 device implant releasing CNTF. The study will be completed once the final participant has received three years of follow-up. Outcome Measures: The primary outcome is the number and severity of adverse events and systemic and ocular toxicities at six months post-implantation. Additional safety of ocular CNTF implants in participants with CNGB3 achromatopsia will be determined from assessment of retinal function, ocular structure and occurrence of adverse events at all time points. Secondary outcomes include changes in visual function including visual acuity and color vision, electroretinogram (ERG) responses, and retinal imaging with optical coherence tomography (OCT).
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
5
20 ng/day released into the eye
National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, 9000 Rockville Pike
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
Number of Adverse Events at Six Months Post-Implantation
The primary outcome is the total number of adverse events reported within six months post-implantation.
Time frame: Day 1, Week 1, Week 4, Week 12, Week 24 post-implantation
Number of Severe Adverse Events at Six Months Post-Implantation
The number of severe adverse events reported within six months post-implantation.
Time frame: Day 1, Week 1, Week 4, Week 12, Week 24 post-implantation
Number of Ocular Adverse Events at Six Months Post-Implantation
The number of eye-related adverse events reported within six months post-implantation.
Time frame: Day 1, Week 1, Week 4, Week 12, Week 24 post-implantation
Number of Non-Ocular Adverse Events at Six Months Post-Implantation
The number of non eye-related adverse events reported within six months post-implantation.
Time frame: Day 1, Week 1, Week 4, Week 12, Week 24 post-implantation
Number of Adverse Events at All Time Points Post-Implantation
The total number of adverse events reported from Day 1 post-implantation through study completion at Year 3.
Time frame: Day 1, Week 1, Week 4, Week 12, Week 24, Week 52, Week 78, Week 156 post-implantation
Number of Severe Adverse Events at All Time Points Post-Implantation
The total number of severe adverse events reported from Day 1 post-implantation through study completion at Year 3. Although there were two serious adverse events (SAEs) reported during the study, only one event's severity was classified as "severe."
Time frame: Day 1, Week 1, Week 4, Week 12, Week 24, Week 52, Week 78, Week 156 post-implantation
Number of Ocular Adverse Events at All Time Points Post-Implantation
The total number of eye-related adverse events reported from Day 1 post-implantation through study completion at Year 3.
Time frame: Day 1, Week 1, Week 4, Week 12, Week 24, Week 52, Week 78, Week 156 post-implantation
Number of Non-Ocular Adverse Events at All Time Points Post-Implantation
The total number of non eye-related adverse events reported from Day 1 post-implantation through study completion at Year 3.
Time frame: Day 1, Week 1, Week 4, Week 12, Week 24, Week 52, Week 78, Week 156 post-implantation
Number of Participants Who Experienced an Improvement in Visual Acuity of Greater Than 0.3 logMAR (Logarithm of the Minimum Angle of Resolution) Post-Implantation in the Study Eye.
Improvement of visual acuity was assessed on both the study and control eyes. Visual acuity was measured using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) protocol. Acuity is measured as letters read on an ETDRS eye chart and the letters read equate to Snellen measurements. For example, if a participant reads between 84 and 88 letters, the equivalent Snellen measurement is 20/20. . The LogMAR scale \[expressed as the (decadic) logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (range from +1.00 to -0.30)\] converts the geometric sequence of a traditional chart to a linear scale. It measures VA loss; positive values indicate vision loss, whereas negative values denote normal or better VA. A lower LogMAR value indicates better VA. For example, a visual acuity of 20/20 corresponds to a logMAR value of zero (0), and a visual acuity of 20/100 corresponds to a LogMAR value of 0.7.
Time frame: Day 1, Week 1, Week 4, Week 12, Week 24, Week 52, Week 78, Week 156 post-implantation
Number of Participants Who Experienced an Improvement in Visual Acuity of Greater Than 0.3 logMAR (Logarithm of the Minimum Angle of Resolution) Post-Implantation in the Untreated Control Eye.
Improvement of visual acuity was assessed on both the study and control eyes. Visual acuity was measured using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) protocol. Acuity is measured as letters read on an ETDRS eye chart and the letters read equate to Snellen measurements. For example, if a participant reads between 84 and 88 letters, the equivalent Snellen measurement is 20/20. . The LogMAR scale \[expressed as the (decadic) logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (range from +1.00 to -0.30)\] converts the geometric sequence of a traditional chart to a linear scale. It measures VA loss; positive values indicate vision loss, whereas negative values denote normal or better VA. A lower LogMAR value indicates better VA. For example, a visual acuity of 20/20 corresponds to a logMAR value of zero (0), and a visual acuity of 20/100 corresponds to a LogMAR value of 0.7.
Time frame: Day 1, Week 1, Week 4, Week 12, Week 24, Week 52, Week 78, Week 156 post-implantation
Number of Participants Who Experienced an Increase in Either the Rod or Cone Electroretinogram (ERG) Responses of More Than 75% Post-Implantation in the Study Eye.
Full-field ERGs were recorded according to International Society of Clinical Electrophysiology of Vision Standards (ISCEV).
Time frame: Day 1, Week 1, Week 4, Week 12, Week 24, Week 52, Week 78, Week 156 post-implantation
Number of Participants Who Experienced an Increase in Either the Rod or Cone Electroretinogram (ERG) Responses of More Than 75% Post-Implantation in the Untreated Control Eye.
Full-field ERGs were recorded according to International Society of Clinical Electrophysiology of Vision Standards (ISCEV).
Time frame: Day 1, Week 1, Week 4, Week 12, Week 24, Week 52, Week 78, Week 156 post-implantation
Number of Participants Who Experienced an Improvement in Color Discrimination and/or Matching Post-Implantation in the Study Eye.
Color hue discrimination was tested by the Nagel anomaloscope, American Optical Hardy Rand Rittler (AOHRR) color plates, and a low vision version of the Cambridge Color Test (LvCCT) implemented on a ViSaGe System (Cambridge Research Systems Ltd., Rochester, UK) using custom-written software. Hardy Rand Rittler testing followed the guidelines accompanying the test and administered under a Macbeth Lamp at 300 lux.
Time frame: Day 1, Week 1, Week 4, Week 12, Week 24, Week 52, Week 78, Week 156 post-implantation
Number of Participants Who Experienced an Improvement in Color Discrimination and/or Matching Post-Implantation in the Untreated Control Eye.
Color hue discrimination was tested by the Nagel anomaloscope, American Optical Hardy Rand Rittler (AOHRR) color plates, and a low vision version of the Cambridge Color Test (LvCCT) implemented on a ViSaGe System (Cambridge Research Systems Ltd., Rochester, UK) using custom-written software. Hardy Rand Rittler testing followed the guidelines accompanying the test and administered under a Macbeth Lamp at 300 lux.
Time frame: Day 1, Week 1, Week 4, Week 12, Week 24, Week 52, Week 78, Week 156 post-implantation
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.