* INTERACT study: to evaluate the pathological response rate in cT3 rectal cancer * LEADER study: to evaluate the impact on local control of local excision
* INTERACT study: to evaluate the pathological response rate evaluated according to TRG scale comparing accelerated radiotherapy on the gross tumour combined plus standard radiotherapy to the pelvis in association with chronomodulated capecitabine (XELACRT arm) versus oxaliplatin added to standard pelvis radiotherapy and same chronomodulated Capecitabine (XELOXRT arm) * LEADER study: to evaluate the impact on local control of local excision in patients who had a major clinical response evaluated by MRI and confirmed by TRG 1-2 score.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
616
Xeloda 1650mg/m2 chronomodulated (h 8.00 a.m. 25% of total dose ; h 6.00 p.m. 25% of total dose; h 11.00 p.m. 50% of total dose) during the whole treatment time. RT: pelvic treatment is the same for both arms: 45 Gy are delivered to the whole pelvis at 1.8 Gy daily, 5 times per week. In the XEL-ACRT arm a boost of 10 Gy is delivered to the mesorectum corresponding to the GTV, at 1 Gy for fraction to a total dose of 55 Gy, in 10 fractions over 5 weeks, 2 times a week. The daily dose of the boost will be delivered twice a week immediately after the daily dose administered to the pelvis (concomitant boost).
* Xeloda: 1300 mg/m2 chronomodulated (h 8.00 a.m. 25% of total dose ; h 6.00 p.m. 25% of total dose; h 11.00 p.m. 50% of total dose), during the whole treatment time; * Oxaliplatin: 130mg/m2, days 1, 19, 38 RT: pelvic treatment is the same for both arms: 45 Gy are delivered to the whole pelvis at 1.8 Gy daily, 5 times per week; In the XELOX-RT arm a boost of 5.4 Gy is delivered to the mesorectum corresponding to GTV, at 1.8 Gy daily, in 3 fractions, to a total dose of 50.4 Gy. The boost will be delivered at the end of the irradiation of the pelvis (sequential boost).
Catholic University of Sacred Heart
Rome, Italy, Italy
RECRUITINGPathological major downstaging
INTERACT study: evaluation of T pathological major downstaging, considered as the overall rate of any TRG1 or TRG 2 scored patients; LEADER study (optional): To evaluate the impact on local control of local excision in patients who had a major clinical response, evaluated by EUS/ MRI, yN0 evaluated by multislice CT / MRI, and confirmed by TRG 1-2 score.
Time frame: 15-20 weeks after the randomization
Tumor downstaging
Secondary objectives: * Tumour downstaging, evaluated by the comparison of clinical staging before combined modality treatment toward pathological staging. * feasibility of a sphincter saving surgical procedure; * evaluation of activity of preoperative treatment (clinical response, facultative) * post-surgical functional outcome; * evaluation of the local control of the disease; * estimates (Kaplan-Meier, product limit method) of the disease free survival; * Evaluation of adverse events and adverse reactions to treatment, according to both the RTOG and NCI-CTC criteria.
Time frame: 15-20 weeks after the randomization
sphincter saving surgery
Secondary objectives: * Tumour downstaging, evaluated by the comparison of clinical staging before combined modality treatment toward pathological staging. * feasibility of a sphincter saving surgical procedure; * evaluation of activity of preoperative treatment (clinical response, facultative) * post-surgical functional outcome; * evaluation of the local control of the disease; * estimates (Kaplan-Meier, product limit method) of the disease free survival; * Evaluation of adverse events and adverse reactions to treatment, according to both the RTOG and NCI-CTC criteria.
Time frame: 15-20 weeks after the randomization
local control
Secondary objectives: * Tumour downstaging, evaluated by the comparison of clinical staging before combined modality treatment toward pathological staging. * feasibility of a sphincter saving surgical procedure; * evaluation of activity of preoperative treatment (clinical response, facultative) * post-surgical functional outcome; * evaluation of the local control of the disease; * estimates (Kaplan-Meier, product limit method) of the disease free survival; * Evaluation of adverse events and adverse reactions to treatment, according to both the RTOG and NCI-CTC criteria.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: 15-20 weeks after the randomization
survival
Secondary objectives: * Tumour downstaging, evaluated by the comparison of clinical staging before combined modality treatment toward pathological staging. * feasibility of a sphincter saving surgical procedure; * evaluation of activity of preoperative treatment (clinical response, facultative) * post-surgical functional outcome; * evaluation of the local control of the disease; * estimates (Kaplan-Meier, product limit method) of the disease free survival; * Evaluation of adverse events and adverse reactions to treatment, according to both the RTOG and NCI-CTC criteria.
Time frame: 15-20 weeks after the randomization