In this phase 3 clinical trial, a second generation ACI (autologous chondrocyte implantation technique) is compared to standard of care therapy (microfracture) to treat traumatic cartilage defects of the knee for efficacy and safety. The investigated study treatment NOVOCART 3D plus is a biphasic biological scaffold which contains cultivated chondrocytes derived from the patient in a previous tissue harvest procedure. Allocation to the study treatment is done by randomization in a ration of 2:1 in favor to ACI (investigational product). Follow-up data for efficacy is collected for 2 years: follow-up visits are performed 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months and 24 months after treatment; additional data for safety will be collected for up to 5 years: 36, 48, and 60 months after treatment. The study involves knee surgery (by arthroscopy, or mini-arthrotomically for implantation surgery), and blood withdrawal for safety within the first year after treatment. Initial imaging is required at baseline. Optional MRI imaging and biomarker collection is done as substudy at specific sites only.
For the cartilage cell product NOVOCART® 3D plus, which is used in the study described here, the company TETEC AG obtained an expanded production authorization from the medication monitoring authorities in compliance with Section 13, Para. 1 of the Medicinal Products Act in 2003. This entitles TETEC AG to produce the pharmaceutical product and already distribute it. More than 6000 patients were already successfully treated with NOVOCART® 3D in Europe since 2003. In order to obtain a general market authorization for NOVOCART® 3D plus, this control group study is conducted, in which the superiority of the safety and effectiveness of carrier-bound Autologous Chondrocyte Transplantation with NOVOCART® 3D plus compared to the standard of care microfracture surgery needs to be proven. This study further aims at developing and validating known and new biologic markers for the quality and clinical efficacy of the product as requested in the context of identity, purity and potency characteristics of the medicinal/investigational product. The patients will receive one of the therapeutic procedures in the study. The treatment procedure which will be used will be decided by a previously specified randomization process. This type of study meets the high quality requirements of the statutorily specified safety and quality regulations which are also referred to as "Good Clinical Practice" (GCP). The probability of the patient being allocated to one of the two treatments is 2:1; that is, an approx. 67% probability of therapy with NOVOCART® 3D plus and an approx. 33% probability of therapy with microfracture. Neither the patient, nor the investigator will be able to influence the treatment assignment. Patients will be screened for eligibility at the Screening Visit. Each patient will remain in the study for 24 months post-implant for the effectiveness assessments, and then an additional three years to complete the planned post-market phase. Each patient will be in the study for up to five years. Cells and tissues collected from this study will be used in other in vitro-controlled experiments aimed at developing and validating known and novel biologic markers to quantify cell quality in the context of identity, purity and potency. Prognostic values of these biologic markers will be examined by correlating them with clinical data collected in this study.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
263
Two-Step intervention: 1) cartilage cells are collected from the patient during arthroscopy 2) collected cartilage cells are cultivated in a sterile environment, seeded in an organic matrix scaffold and implanted into the defect location (knee, femur)
single-step treatment: defect location (knee, femur) is debrided, then bone plate is drilled mechanically to allow cells from the bone marrow to move to the defect location and to develop a scar tissue
Privatklinik Doebling
Vienna, Austria
Fakultni nemocnice Brno - Ortopedicka klinika
Brno, Czechia
Urazova nemocnice v Brne - Traumatologie
Brno, Czechia
NH Hospital, a.s., Ortopedicke oddeleni nemocnice Horovice
Hořovice, Czechia
Fakultni nemocnice Hradec Kralove - Ortopedicka klinika
Hradec Králové, Czechia
Subjective IKDC score
The primary endpoint is the change from baseline in the "2000 International Knee Documentation Committee" (IKDC) subjective score to 24-month visit. The IKDC will be recorded for NOVOCART® 3D plus and microfracture patients at baseline visit 1 and at the 6 weeks, 3-, 6-, 12-, 24-, 36-, 48,- and 60-month follow-up assessments.
Time frame: Baseline assessment to 24-month follow-up assessment
IKDC objective physician score
The IKDC objective physician score will be recorded for both arms at baseline visit 1 and at the 6 weeks, 3-, 6-, 12-, 24-, 36-, 48,- and 60-month follow-up assessments. A sequentially rejecting, hierarchical test procedure will be employed to test these secondary endpoints in the a-priori defined order given here after the test primary efficacy variable was passed. The change from baseline to the 24-month visit in the IKDC objective physician score and from baseline to the 24-month visit will be evaluated.
Time frame: Baseline assessment to 24-month follow-up assessment
Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)
The KOOS will be recorded for both arms at baseline visit 1 and at the 6 weeks, 3-, 6-, 12-, 24-, 36-, 48,- and 60-month follow-up assessments. A sequentially rejecting, hierarchical test procedure will be employed to test these secondary endpoints in the a-priori defined order given here after the test primary efficacy variable was passed. The change from baseline to 24-month visit in the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and from baseline to 24-month visit will be evaluated.
Time frame: Baseline assessment to 24-month follow-up assessment
MOCART Score (MRI)
Another secondary efficacy endpoint is the in vivo performance (grading on quality of cartilage fill) measured by the change from baseline to the 36-month assessment of the Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue (MOCART) score. These assessments will be performed on a subset of patients (64 in NOVOCART and 32 in microfracture arm). The MRI will be recorded at 3, 12, 24 and 60 months follow-up visit.
Time frame: Baseline assessment to the 24-month assessment
Health-related quality of life as measured by the SF-36 survey
Another secondary efficacy endpoint is the change from baseline to the 24-month visit in the SF-36 to measure clinical utility and summarize health-related quality-of-life and cost-effectiveness. The SF-36 will be recorded for NOVOCART® 3D plus and microfracture patients at baseline visit 1 and at the 6 weeks, 3-, 6-, 12-, 24-, 36-, 48,- and 60-month follow-up assessments.
Time frame: Baseline assessment to 24-month follow-up assessment
Surgical time (cut-to-suture time)
The surgical time will be measured in minutes and recorded for NOVOCART® 3D plus patients at arthroscopy (\>= 1 day after screening) and transplantation (24 +-5 days post-arthroscopy); for microfracture patients surgical time will be measured in minutes and recorded at arthroscopy (\>= 1 day after screening).
Time frame: Transplantation (24 +-5 days post-arthroscopy) and/or arthroscopy (>= 1 day after screening), depending on the study arm
Length of incision
The length of incision will be measured in cm and recorded for NOVOCART® 3D plus patients at transplantation (24 +-5 days post-arthroscopy)
Time frame: Only for verum group at transplantation (24 +-5 days post-arthroscopy)
Any unanticipated adverse event
Event descriptions, onset, resolution dates, relationship to the IP and procedures of any AEs will be recorded. Each event will be categorized by seriousness and intensity to facilitate complete safety reporting throughout the trial. While comparisons between treatment groups can be made for each class of AE, there is no statistical hypothesis governing acceptance of this endpoint at the end of the clinical study because of the different AE profiles associated with the two treatment arms.
Time frame: Baseline assessment up to 60-months follow-up assessment
Treatment Failure
Any event related to a diagnosed failure of the study treatment
Time frame: From completion of study treatment until 60-months follow-up assessment
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Pardubicka nemocnice
Pardubice, Czechia
Fakultni nemocnice v Motole
Prague, Czechia
UVN - Vojenska fakultni nemocnice Praha
Prague, Czechia
Hôpital Ambroise Paré - Service de Chirurgie Orthopedique et Traumatologie
Boulogne-Billancourt, France
Polyclinique Saint-Roch
Montpellier, France
...and 25 more locations