The main purpose of the present study is to assess whether the sensitivity of Ultrasound-guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is superior to that of conventional TBNA in the diagnosis of hilar/mediastinal adenopathy and lung cancer staging.
The role of transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA) for the diagnosis of hilar/mediastinal adenopathy and lung cancer staging is well established. However, it is a blind procedure and its diagnostic yield seems to be related to the operator experience, as well as to the size and location of lymph nodes. In the recent years, there has been increased interest in imaging-assisted TBNA and the endobronchial ultrasound has been suggested to be feasible and to improve the diagnostic yield. Another technique able to optimize the performance of transbronchial aspirations is the rapid on-site cytological examination (ROSE), allowing to assess the adequacy of samples collected. In this context, no comparative studies between standard TBNA and EBUS-TBNA have been performed. It is very important for clinical practice to definitively assess the possible superiority of EBUS-TBNA in terms of sensitivity, and to provide information regarding safety, procedural time and costs to define the best diagnostic strategy. The study is focused on 252 patients who have at least one hilar/mediastinal lymph node \> 1 cm on CT scan in at least one approachable lymph nodal station (except 2R and 2L) for which a diagnostic cyto-histological assessment is required for clinical purpose. Patients will be randomized 1:1 (control : intervention) by a computer-generated random-allocation system to undergo EBUS-TBNA or conventional TBNA. In case of failure of conventional TBNA, the operator will shift to EBUS procedure. Moreover,a subgroup analysis will be perform to assess the potential impact of lymphnode size and position on final results(univariate analysis).
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
253
Patients allocated in the intervention group will undergo EBUS-TBNA procedure, performed in a bronchoscopy suite by the same operator under conscious sedation Three needle passes for each approachable station will be performed. The samples obtained will be examined on-site by experienced blinded cytopathologist.All specimens obtained will be send to definitive cytological and histological evaluation and the final diagnosis will be collected and reported on CRFs
Pulmonary Diseases Unit, Department of Immunoallergic and Respiratory Diseases, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria 'Ospedali Riuniti'
Ancona, The Marches, Italy
To compare the sensitivity of EBUS-TBNA and conventional TBNA in the diagnosis of hilar/mediastinal adenopathies
The sensitivity is defined as the rate of true positive diagnoses/(true positive + false negative). Sensitivity of EBUS-TBNA will be considered superior to that of conventional TBNA if it will achieve at least a value of 90%
Time frame: 36 months
Specificity of TBNA and EBUS-TBNA
Specificity is defined as the rate of true negatives diagnoses /true negative + false positive
Time frame: 36 months
Sensitivity of EBUS-TBNA performed after the possible failure of traditional TBNA
Time frame: 36 months
Number of partecipants with adverse events
Time frame: 36 months
Costs related to each diagnostic strategy
It will be evaluated the cost related to the whole procedure, including the possible shift to EBUS-TBNA.
Time frame: 36 months
Procedural time
Time frame: 36 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.