This is a WHO-sponsored trial. Combination therapy with streptomycin and rifampicin has been the standard antibiotic treatment for M. ulcerans infection since 2004. In March 2010, a WHO Technical Advisory Group recommended that a trial be carried out to develop a fully oral treatment for the disease. Although the current treatment is effective, injection with streptomycin is a problem. Several small observational studies (published and unpublished) have shown that a fully oral treatment is promising. This WHO sponsored study will be a randomized, controlled open label non-inferiority phase II/III, multi-centre trial (1 centre in Benin and 4 centres in Ghana), with two parallel treatment groups. The ultimate goal is to search for an effective alternative treatment to the current standard WHO-recommended therapy for all forms of Buruli ulcer, which includes injections of streptomycin with inherent logistic, operational and safety disadvantages. Financial and material support: 1. American Leprosy Missions, USA 2. Raoul Follereau Foundation, France 3. MAP International, USA 4. Sanofi, France 5. 7th Framework Programme of the European Union: BuruliVac project (241500) 6. Aranz Medical Limited, New Zealand
A total of 415 patients in whom Buruli ulcer has been clinically diagnosed will be included in the study, which will consist of 332 cases of category I and II Buruli ulcers (\<10 cm) confirmed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR), plus 83 non PCR-confirmed Buruli ulcers. Patients will be randomized to receive treatment with the two antibiotic regimens as follows: (i) Regimen I (SR8): 15 mg/kg streptomycin per day intramuscular injection for 8 weeks plus 10 mg/kg per day oral rifampicin for 8 weeks; (ii) Regimen II (CR8): 15 mg/kg per day oral extended-release clarithromycin for 8 weeks plus 10 mg/kg per day oral rifampicin for 8 weeks. Assessments before, during and after the course of antibiotic treatment will include full medical history, clinical assessments and monitoring of vital signs, assessment of the lesion, laboratory investigations, hearing test, electrocardiogram, pregnancy test, voluntary HIV counseling and testing, and functional limitation assessment. The primary efficacy parameters are healing without recurrence and without excision surgery 12 months after the start of treatment. The primary endpoint will be assessed by a panel of experts unaware of the treatment ('single blinded' for treatment allocation). Statistician: Mr Bruno Scherrer, Consultant, Drugs for Neglected Diseases initiative, Switzerland Data Management: Mr Raymond Omollo, Drugs for Neglected Diseases initiative (DNDi) Africa
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
310
oral administration of Clarithromycin extended release
daily intramuscular drug injection
Pobè Treatment Center
Pobè, Benin
Agogo Presbyterian Hospital
Agogo, Ghana
Dunkwa Government Hospital
Dunkwa-on-Offin, Ghana
Nkawie-Toase Government Hospital
Nkawie Panyin, Ghana
Tepa Government Hosital
Tepa, Ghana
healing without recurrence and without excision surgery
complete epithelialisation and absence of swelling at the site of original infection, measured 12 months after start of treatment; lesion site will be examined by inspection and palpation, and documented by digital camera; digital images will be examined by panel of wound experts unaware of treatment allocation
Time frame: 12 months after start of treatment
Recurrence rate within 12 months of treatment initiation
number of recurrent lesions occurring after initial healing within 12 months after start of treatment
Time frame: 12 months
Rate of treatment failure within 12 months of treatment initiation
proportion of treatment failure will be compared between groups
Time frame: 12 months
Rate of paradoxical response within 12 months of treatment initiation
paradoxical responses that have occurred during BUD treatment will be compared in both treatment arms
Time frame: 12 months
Proportion of patients with reduction in lesion surface area within 12 months of treatment initiation
if not cured, will there be a difference between groups in terms of reduction of lesion size?
Time frame: 12 months
Time taken for complete lesion healing within 12 months of treatment initiation
do lesions heal faster in one of the two treatments?
Time frame: 12 months
Proportion (%) of patients with complete healing without additional surgery or relapse
Time frame: 12 months
Interval between healing and recurrence
if recurrences occur, there might be a difference in time between healing and recurrences between treatment groups
Time frame: 12 months
Proportion of each type of surgery within 12 months of treatment initiation
We do not expect surgery but IF doctors operate, which type of surgery would doctors use, and does this differ between groups?
Time frame: 12 months
Time from treatment initiation to surgery if any
does the timing of surgery differ between groups for the proportion of patients in whom doctors decide to operate?
Time frame: 12months
Proportion of patients with residual functional limitations
do treatments differ in terms of chance to develop functional limitations?
Time frame: 12 months
Treatment discontinuation and compliance rates
one treatment might be better tolerated than the other; do treatments differ in terms of adherence problems, and do participants in any of these two treatment arms differ in terms of the chance to discontinue the treatment?
Time frame: 8 weeks
Incidence of all adverse effects (AEs) within 12 months of treatment initiation
adverse effects occurring during or after treatment may be different between treatments
Time frame: 12 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.