The objective of the study (part A) is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of BAY80-6946 in patients with indolent or aggressive Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma, who have progressed after standard therapy. 30 patients will be enrolled to both indolent and aggressive disease group. The objective of the study part B (CHRONOS-1) is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of BAY80-6946 in patients with relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma. 120 patients will be enrolled in the part B of the study. Further objectives are to evaluate the pharmacokinetics and biomarkers. Quality of life will be a further objective of part B of the study. In a cohort of 20 patients (enrolled both in part A and B) an ECG substudy will be performed to assess the potential for cardiac toxicity and QT/QTc interval prolongation of BAY80-6946. After an up to 28-day screening period, eligible patients will start treatment with BAY80-6946 at a dose of 0.8 mg/kg (Part A) and at a dose of 60 mg (Part B). Treatment will be continued until disease has progressed or until another criterion is met for withdrawal from study. An end-of-treatment visit will be performed within 7 days after discontinuation of study treatment. Thirty to 35 days after last study drug administration, a safety followup visit will be performed for the collection of adverse events (AEs) and concomitant medication data. Patients will be contacted quarterly to determine overall survival status up to 4 years after last patient completed treatment. Patients who discontinue study drug for reasons other than disease progression will enter the Active Assessment Follow-up period. The end of study notification to Health Authorities will be based on the completion of the collection of survival data. The efficacy is measured by the decrease in tumor size. Tumor assessments will be done at Screening, every 8 weeks during Year 1, every 12 weeks during Year 2, and every 6 months during Year 3. Blood samples will be collected for pharmacokinetic analysis. Archival tumor tissue and blood samples will be collected for biomarker analysis (mandatory) and for central pathology review (part B), fresh biopsy tissue will also be collected if available.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
227
BAY 80-6946 is administered in a normal saline solution, 100 mL, intravenously over 1h. No intravenous glucose preparations should be administered on the days of infusion. Dosing is weekly for the first 3 weeks (on Days 1, 8, and 15) of a 28-day cycle, followed by a 1-week break (i.e., no infusion on Day 22). Part A: The individual dose will be 0.8 mg/kg (max. 65 mg) per infusion from Cycle 1 on. The maximum dose of 65 mg should never be exceeded. Part B: The individual dose will be 60 mg per infusion from Cycle 1 on.
Unnamed facility
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
Unnamed facility
Gilbert, Arizona, United States
Unnamed facility
Anaheim, California, United States
Unnamed facility
Aurora, Colorado, United States
Unnamed facility
Englewood, Colorado, United States
Unnamed facility
Objective Response Rate (ORR) Based on Independent Review-Part A
Objective response rate was defined as the proportion of participants with a best response rating of complete response (CR), unconfirmed complete response (CRu) or partial response (PR), based on the Report of an International Workshop to Standardize Response Criteria for non-Hodgkins Lymphomas, Cheson, 1999, as evaluated by the Independent Response Adjudication Committee (IRAC). For chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) patients Hallek criteria (2008) were used and assessed by investigator.
Time frame: Baseline up to the last patient has completed the 16 weeks of treatment
ORR Based on Independent Review-Part B
Objective response rate was defined as the proportion of participants with a best response rating of CR or PR, based on the International Working Group Revised response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma, Cheson 2007.
Time frame: Baseline up to the last patient has completed the 16 weeks of treatment
ORR Based on Investigator Assessment-Part A
Objective response rate was defined as the proportion of participants with a best response rating of CR, CRu or PR, based on the Report of an International Workshop to Standardize Response Criteria for non-Hodgkins Lymphomas, Cheson, 1999. For CLL patients Hallek criteria (2008) were used and assessed by investigator.
Time frame: Baseline up to the last patient has completed the 16 weeks of treatment
ORR Based on Investigator Assessment-Part B
Objective response rate was defined as the proportion of participants with a best response rating of CR or PR, based on the International Working Group Revised response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma, Cheson 2007.
Time frame: Baseline up to the last patient has completed the 16 weeks of treatment
Duration of Response (DOR) Based on Independent Review-Part A
DOR was defined as the time from the date of the first observed tumor response of CR or PR (whichever was noted earlier) to first subsequent disease progression (either first progressive disease \[PD\], first clinical progression or first AE associated with clinical disease progression) or death caused by disease progression, if this death occurred before progression was documented. All deaths were considered as 'caused by disease progression' except deaths with the reason "other" or "AE not related to disease progression. DOR was evaluated only for patients with at least one tumor response of CR, CRu, or PR. Some patients may have had no report of disease progression nor death caused by disease progression until the date of the LPLV. With regards to DOR, these patients were considered as right censored at the date of their last tumor assessment after first observed tumor response.
Time frame: Baseline up to approximately 6 years
DOR Based on Independent Review-Part B
DOR was defined as the time from the date of the first observed tumor response of CR or PR (whichever was noted earlier) to first subsequent disease progression (either first progressive disease \[PD\], first clinical progression or first AE associated with clinical disease progression) or death caused by disease progression, if this death occurred before progression was documented. All deaths were considered as 'caused by disease progression' except deaths with the reason "other" or "AE not related to disease progression. DOR was evaluated only for patients with at least one tumor response of CR, CRu, or PR. Some patients may have had no report of disease progression nor death caused by disease progression until the date of the LPLV. With regards to DOR, these patients were considered as right censored at the date of their last tumor assessment after first observed tumor response.
Time frame: Baseline up to approximately 9 years 7 months
DOR Based on Investigator Assessment-Part A
DOR was defined as the time from the date of the first observed tumor response of CR or PR (whichever was noted earlier) to first subsequent disease progression (either first progressive disease \[PD\], first clinical progression or first AE associated with clinical disease progression) or death caused by disease progression, if this death occurred before progression was documented. All deaths were considered as 'caused by disease progression' except deaths with the reason "other" or "AE not related to disease progression. DOR was evaluated only for patients with at least one tumor response of CR, CRu, or PR. Some patients may have had no report of disease progression nor death caused by disease progression until the date of the LPLV. With regards to DOR, these patients were considered as right censored at the date of their last tumor assessment after first observed tumor response.
Time frame: Baseline up to approximately 6 years
DOR Based on Investigator Assessment-Part B
DOR was defined as the time from the date of the first observed tumor response of CR or PR (whichever was noted earlier) to first subsequent disease progression (either first progressive disease \[PD\], first clinical progression or first AE associated with clinical disease progression) or death caused by disease progression, if this death occurred before progression was documented. All deaths were considered as 'caused by disease progression' except deaths with the reason "other" or "AE not related to disease progression. DOR was evaluated only for patients with at least one tumor response of CR, CRu, or PR. Some patients may have had no report of disease progression nor death caused by disease progression until the date of the LPLV. With regards to DOR, these patients were considered as right censored at the date of their last tumor assessment after first observed tumor response.
Time frame: Baseline up to approximately 9 years 7 months
Progression Free Survival (PFS) Based on Independent Review-Part A
PFS was defined as the time (in days) from the date of the first treatment to the date of first observed PD (radiological or clinical, or first AE associated with clinical PD, whichever was earlier) or death due to any cause (if death occurred before progression was documented).
Time frame: Baseline up to approximately 6 years
PFS Based on Independent Review-Part B
PFS was defined as the time (in days) from the date of the first treatment to the date of first observed PD (radiological or clinical, or first AE associated with clinical PD, whichever was earlier) or death due to any cause (if death occurred before progression was documented).
Time frame: Baseline up to approximately 9 years 7 months
PFS Based on Investigator Assessment-Part A
PFS was defined as the time (in days) from the date of the first treatment to the date of first observed PD (radiological or clinical, or first AE associated with clinical PD, whichever was earlier) or death due to any cause (if death occurred before progression was documented).
Time frame: Baseline up to approximately 6 years
PFS Based on Investigator Assessment-Part B
PFS was defined as the time (in days) from the date of the first treatment to the date of first observed PD (radiological or clinical, or first AE associated with clinical PD, whichever was earlier) or death due to any cause (if death occurred before progression was documented).
Time frame: Baseline up to approximately 9 years 7 months
Overall Survival (OS)-Part A
OS was defined as the time (in days) from the date of first administration of study treatment to death due to any cause. Patients who were alive at the date of the LPLV were censored at the minimum of the date of LPLV and the last available date of evidence that the patient was still alive.
Time frame: Baseline up to approximately 6 years
OS-Part B
OS was defined as the time (in days) from the date of first administration of study treatment to death due to any cause. OS was defined as the time (in days) from the date of first administration of study treatment to death due to any cause. Patients who were alive at the date of the LPLV were censored at the minimum of the date of LPLV and the last available date of evidence that the patient was still alive.
Time frame: Baseline up to approximately 9 years 7 months
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Lymphoma Lymphoma Subscale (FACT-Lym LymS) at Week 16 - Part B
HRQoL assessment was used to describe development of patients with copanlisib by using FACT-Lym questionnaire assessment tool. It contains 42 items (questions) covering HRQoL, common lymphoma symptoms and treatment side-effects. The FACT - General (FACT-G) questionnaire contains 27 items covering 4 core HRQoL subscales: Physical Wellbeing (7 items), Social/Family Wellbeing (7), Emotional Wellbeing (6), and Functional Wellbeing (7). The FACT-Lym also includes an Additional Concerns subscale (15 items) (FACT-Lym LymS), addressing issues typically experienced by lymphoma patients. Some of the issues covered include pain, itching, night sweats, trouble sleeping, fatigue and trouble concentrating. FACT-Lym also asks patients about lumps and swelling, fevers, infections, weight, appetite, emotional stability and treatment. Score range for the FACT-Lym LymS was 0 - 60, higher score represent less symptoms. Here in below table "n" signifies evaluable participants for the respective category.
Time frame: Baseline up to week 16
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Lymphoma (FACT-Lym) Total Score at Week 16 - Part B
HRQoL assessment was used to describe development of patients with copanlisib by using FACT-Lym questionnaire assessment tool. It contains 42 items (questions) covering HRQoL, common lymphoma symptoms and treatment side-effects. The FACT - General (FACT-G) questionnaire contains 27 items covering 4 core HRQoL subscales: Physical Wellbeing (7 items), Social/Family Wellbeing (7), Emotional Wellbeing (6), and Functional Wellbeing (7). The FACT-Lym also includes an Additional Concerns subscale (15 items) (FACT-Lym LymS), addressing issues typically experienced by lymphoma patients. Some of the issues covered include pain, itching, night sweats, trouble sleeping, fatigue and trouble concentrating. FACT-Lym also asks patients about lumps and swelling, fevers, infections, weight, appetite, emotional stability and treatment. FACT-Lym total score range was 0-168, higher score indicates better HRQoL. Here, in the below table "n" signifies evaluable participants for the respective category.
Time frame: Baseline up to week 16
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Fort Collins, Colorado, United States
Unnamed facility
Seattle, Florida, United States
Unnamed facility
Louisville, Kentucky, United States
Unnamed facility
Detroit, Michigan, United States
Unnamed facility
Saint Louis Park, Minnesota, United States
...and 92 more locations