Patients who have myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery are at a higher risk of dying than those who do not. One in 10 patients with myocardial injury will die within 30 days of surgery. This risk of death exists up to one year after myocardial injury. There are currently no treatments or guidelines available for heart injury after surgery, but there is evidence that taking a blood-thinner can prevent some of the deaths, both in the short and long-term. The purpose of this trial is to test the effect of two drugs (dabigatran and omeprazole) that may prevent mortality, major cardiovascular complications and major upper gastrointestinal bleeding in patients who have had myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery.
Myocardial injury is the most common major vascular complication after noncardiac surgery. Worldwide approximately 10 million adults annually suffer a perioperative myocardial injury. This figure for perioperative myocardial injury represents 15-20% of all cases of myocardial infarction in all settings. Myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery carries a poor prognosis and is an independent predictor of 30-day and 1-year mortality. Myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery (MINS) differs from non-operative myocardial infarction in two ways; it has a poorer prognosis (patients suffering MINS are 2 times more likely to die within 30 days compared to non-operative myocardial infarction in the emergency room) and paradoxically its treatment is less intensive. This difference in the intensity of treatment is likely influenced by several factors including: (1) a majority of patients suffering MINS do not experience ischemic symptoms, potentially influencing physicians' perception of the severity of the event; (2) there is debate as to the pathophysiology of MINS (although emerging evidence does suggest that coronary arterial thrombosis is an important mechanism of MINS); and (3) no randomized controlled trial (RCT) has evaluated an intervention to manage MINS, and hence physicians are uncertain about the risk-benefit ratio of potential interventions (e.g., interventions that are effective in the management of non-operative myocardial infarction). From a human and economic perspective, it is a tragedy that some patients undergoing noncardiac surgery for important reasons (e.g., to obtain a cure of their cancer or to become mobile after a new prosthetic joint) fail to obtain these benefits, because they suffer MINS that ultimately takes their life. There is an urgent need for clinical trials to identify effective therapies to improve the outcomes of patients suffering MINS. There exists promising laboratory, autopsy, imaging, operative, and non-operative data suggesting that patients suffering MINS will benefit from anticoagulant therapy. Dabigatran (a direct thrombin inhibitor) warrants evaluation in the management of MINS. The major limitation of anticoagulation therapy is bleeding, and gastrointestinal bleeding represents a substantial proportion of these complications. Gastrointestinal bleeding is important in its own right, but also because it leads to cessation of anticoagulant therapy which may lead to breakthrough myocardial infarction. Omeprazole (a proton pump inhibitor) is efficacious in preventing upper gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with coronary artery disease who are taking dual antiplatelet therapy, and may benefit patients receiving anticoagulation therapy after suffering MINS. We will undertake a large international RCT to determine the impact of dabigatran in patients who have suffered MINS. We will use a partial factorial design (for patients not taking a proton pump inhibitor) to determine the impact of omeprazole in this setting. We call this RCT the Management of myocardial injury After NoncArdiac surGEry (MANAGE) Trial.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
1,754
Dabigatran 110 mg taken twice daily
Dabigatran placebo taken twice daily
Omeprazole 20 mg capsule taken once daily
Omeprazole placebo taken once daily
Kansas University Medical Center
Kansas City, Kansas, United States
VA Western New York Healthcare System
Buffalo, New York, United States
University of Rochester Medical Center
Rochester, New York, United States
Wake Forest School of Medicine
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States
Oregon Health and Science University
Portland, Oregon, United States
Major vascular complication (for Dabigatran)
A composite of the number of patients suffering vascular mortality, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal non-hemorrhagic stroke, nonfatal peripheral arterial thrombosis, nonfatal amputation, and nonfatal symptomatic venous thromboembolism (i.e., symptomatic pulmonary embolism or symptomatic proximal deep venous thrombosis).
Time frame: Average of 1 year follow-up
Major upper gastrointestinal complication (for Omeprazole)
A composite of the number of patients suffering overt gastroduodenal bleeding, overt upper gastrointestinal bleeding of unknown origin, or upper gastrointestinal perforation.
Time frame: Average of 1 year follow-up
Individual secondary outcomes for Dabigatran
The number of patients suffering all-cause mortality, vascular mortality, myocardial infarction, non-hemorrhagic stroke, cardiac revascularization procedure, symptomatic venous thromboembolism (i.e., symptomatic pulmonary embolism or symptomatic proximal deep venous thrombosis), amputation, peripheral arterial thrombosis, and rehospitalization for vascular reasons.
Time frame: Average of 1 year follow-up
Upper gastrointestinal complication for Omeprazole
A composite of the number of patients suffering overt gastroduodenal bleeding, overt upper gastrointestinal bleeding of unknown origin, symptomatic gastroduodenal ulcer, gastrointestinal pain with underlying multiple gastroduodenal erosions, or upper gastrointestinal perforation.
Time frame: Average of 1 year follow-up
Major vascular complication for Omeprazole
A composite of the number of patients suffering vascular mortality, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal non-hemorrhagic stroke, nonfatal peripheral arterial thrombosis, nonfatal amputation, and nonfatal symptomatic venous thromboembolism (i.e., symptomatic pulmonary embolism or symptomatic proximal deep venous thrombosis).
Time frame: Average of 1 year follow-up
Individual secondary outcomes for Omeprazole
The number of patients suffering overt gastroduodenal bleeding, overt esophageal bleeding, overt upper gastrointestinal bleeding of unknown origin, symptomatic gastroduodenal ulcer, gastrointestinal pain with underlying multiple gastroduodenal erosions, upper gastrointestinal perforation, bleeding of assumed occult gastrointestinal origin with a documented drop in hemoglobin of ≥ 3.0 g/dL, dyspepsia, and mortality.
Time frame: Average of 1 year follow-up
Safety outcomes for Dabigatran
1. A composite of the number of patients suffering life-threatening bleeding, major bleeding, and critical organ bleeding (i.e., intracranial, intraocular, intraspinal, pericardial, retroperitoneal). 2. The number of patients suffering life-threatening bleeding, major bleeding, critical organ bleeding, intracranial bleeding, minor bleeding, hemorrhagic stroke, significant lower gastrointestinal bleeding, non-significant lower gastrointestinal bleeding, fracture, and dyspepsia.
Time frame: Average of 1 year follow-up
Safety outcomes for Omeprazole
The number of patients suffering Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea, diarrhea, community-acquired pneumonia, and fractures.
Time frame: Average of 1 year follow-up
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Drexel University College of Medicine
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
VA North Texas Health Care System Dallas VA Medical Center
Dallas, Texas, United States
Instituto Cardiovascular de Buenos Aires
Caba, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Clinica Parra - Centro de Investigaciones
Rafaela, Santa Fe Province, Argentina
Sanatorio San Martin
Venado Tuerto, Santa Fe Province, Argentina
...and 72 more locations