The Use of the Prevena Incision Management System to Reduce Post-operative Cesarean Delivery Wound Complications

Overview

Aim 1: Assess the effectiveness of the Prevena Incision Management System in decreasing postoperative surgical site infections in the obese parturient undergoing non-emergent cesarean delivery. Aim 2: Assess patient satisfaction after using the Prevena Incision Management System following a non-emergent cesarean delivery. Our overall long term goal is to reduce morbidity and incidence of surgical site infection (SSI) in obese parturient who undergo non-emergent cesarean delivery.

In the United States, the cesarean delivery rate continues to rise. In 2007, approximately 32% of all births occurred by Cesarean delivery, translating to 1.4 million women who underwent this operative procedure. Oklahoma is on par with the national average, with 33.6 % of births occuring by Cesarean delivery (1). Although in 2006 Cesarean delivery was the most commonly performed surgical procedure in the United States, it remains vulnerable to common, as well as rare, complications. Despite continued advances in surgical and aseptic technique, surgical site infections (SSI) continue to be an area of concern for patients, physicians, hospitals, and insurers. In addition to their negative impact on patient quality of life, surgical site infections (SSI) have been estimated to require an additional three thousand dollars per infection in healthcare expenditure (2). In the surgical patient, it has been estimated that SSI account for 25 to 38% of hospital acquired infections (3-4) and 2-5% of patients undergoing surgery of any type will develop a SSI (5). In cesarean delivery in particular, rates of SSI are between 3 to 15%, depending on the population, definition of SSI, and modifiable risk factors (6). In particular, one factor shown to increase risk of SSI in multiple studies is obesity with odds ratios 1.1-4.79 depending on degree of BMI stratification (6-8). Given its prevalence and cost, SSI represents a postoperative complication with far reaching consequences and making it an area of increasing focus for research. Recently, negative pressure wound therapy has come to the forefront in demonstrating improved healing and reduced complications in open and closed surgical wounds of various types. A review of the literature illustrates that prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy device effectiveness in reducing SSI has not been widely evaluated in cesarean deliveries. The goal of this study is to evaluate wound infection rates with the use of the Prevena Incision Management System in obese patients undergoing non-emergent cesarean delivery at a tertiary care center. We propose to initiate a randomized clinical trial of the Prevena Incision Management System in a novel population of patients at high risk of surgical site infection. Given the possibility of unexpected challenges, we propose to begin this project with a pilot study in order to help elucidate factors that may need to be including in a larger study in the future. Also, we anticipate that the pilot study will give us a better insight into the rates of wound complications and potential difference between groups in order to better power a larger study. Rationale for study: Obese patients undergoing Cesarean deliveries have frequent SSIs secondary to modifiable and non-modifiable risk factors. A randomized controlled trial of Prevena Incision Management System, a single use negative pressure therapy unit designed for placement over clean closed surgical incisions, will help reduce rates of surgical site infections and increase the overall quality of life of our patients.

Conditions

Eligibility

Locations (1)

Outcomes