Several techniques have been advocated to get good contacts in dental composite restorations including interdental separation ring. The investigators study focuses on using separation ring with circumferential matrix band instead of a sectional band. Moreover, the investigators have attempted to study proximal tightness and proximal contours of composite restoration as separate variables
A total of 188 premolar teeth with proximal cavity to be assigned on alternate basis in two groups. Intervention group teeth received Automatrix band after cavity preparation followed by the separation ring using clamp while the control group received Automatrix band alone. All teeth to be restored with P-60 composite restorative material(3M-ESPE Dental, USA). Outcome (proximal tightness) is determined by a blinded assessor just after the restoration.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
188
Separation ring placed along with automatrix band
band placed with a tightening device
Dental Clinics, Aga Khan University Hospital
Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan
proximal tightness
The tightness of the proximal contact area resulting from either of the two matrix band system. It was measured using a nine inch long nylon dental floss (Johnson and Johnson, USA).
Time frame: 1 day (just after dental restoration)
proximal contours
To be examined clinically with an explorer and mouth mirror and then on the periapical radiograph by the blinded co investigator.
Time frame: 1 day (just after restoration placement)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.