To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the Medtronic CoreValve® System for the treatment of symptomatic severe aortic stenosis in subjects with significant comorbidities in whom the risk of surgical aortic valve replacement has a predicted operative mortality or serious, irreversible morbidity risk of ≥50% at 30 days.
The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Medtronic CoreValve® System (MCS) in a subset of subjects excluded from the U.S. Extreme Risk Pivotal Trial population due to one or more additional co-morbidities, as measured by a composite of all-cause death or major stroke at 12 months, in the treatment of symptomatic severe aortic stenosis in subjects necessitating aortic valve replacement. Subjects enrolled in this study have a predicted operative mortality or serious, irreversible morbidity risk of ≥50% at 30 days associated with surgical aortic valve replacement.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
782
All-cause Mortality or Major stroke
All-cause Mortality or Major Stroke
Time frame: 12 months
Major Adverse Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Event (MACCE) Event Rate
MACCE is defined as a composite of: • All-Cause Death • Myocardial Infarction (MI) • All Stroke • Reintervention (defined as any cardiac surgery or percutaneous reintervention catheter procedure that repairs, otherwise alters or adjusts, or replaces a previously implanted valve)
Time frame: 30 days, 6 months, 12 months and annually thereafter up to 5 years
The Occurrence of individual MACCE Components
Individual MACCE Components Include: - All Cause Mortality - MI - All stroke - Reintervention (defined as any cardiac surgery or percutaneous reintervention catheter procedure that repairs, otherwise alters or adjusts, or replaces a previously implanted valve)
Time frame: 30 days, 6 months, 12 months and annually thereafter up to 5 years
Major Adverse Events (MAEs)
MAEs Include: •MACCE •Acute Kidney Injury •Cardiac Tamponade •Prosthetic Valve Dysfunction •Cardiogenic Shock •Valve Endocarditis •Life-Threatening, Disabling or Major Bleeding •Major Vascular Complication •Cardiac Perforation •Device Migration/Valve Embolism
Time frame: 30 days, 6 months, 12 months and annually thereafter up to 5 years
Conduction Disturbance Requiring Permanent Pacemaker Implantation
The incidence of conduction disturbance requiring permanent pacemaker implantation
Time frame: 30 days, 6 months, 12 months and annually thereafter up to 5 years
Change in NYHA Class
Change from baseline (continuous variable). A positive number corresponds to NYHA worsening; a negative number corresponds to NYHA improvement.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Banner Good Samaritan
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
Kaiser Permanente - Los Angeles Medical Center
Los Angeles, California, United States
University of Southern California University Hospital
Los Angeles, California, United States
VA Palo Alto Health Care System
Palo Alto, California, United States
Hartford Hospital
Hartford, Connecticut, United States
Yale New Haven Hospital
New Haven, Connecticut, United States
Washington Hospital Center / Georgetown Hospital
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States
University of Miami Health System / Jackson Memorial Hospital
Miami, Florida, United States
Mount Sinai Medical Center
Miami Beach, Florida, United States
Piedmont Heart Institute
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
...and 33 more locations
Time frame: 30 days, 6 months, 12 months and annually thereafter up to 5 years
Change in Distance Walked During 6-minute Walk Test (6MWT) from Baseline
Change in distance walked during 6MWT from baseline
Time frame: 30 days and 12 months
Ratio of Days Alive Out of Hospital Versus Total Days Alive
Time frame: 12 months
Quality of Life (QoL) Change from Baseline
QoL change from baseline using the following measures: •Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) •SF-12 •EuroQoL
Time frame: 30 days, 6 months, 12 months and annually thereafter up to 5 years
Echocardiographic Assessment of Valve Performance
Using the following measures: • Transvalvular mean gradient • Effective orifice area (EOA) •degree of aortic valve regurgitation
Time frame: 30 days, 6 months, 12 months and annually thereafter up to 5 years
Aortic Valve Disease Hospitalization
The number of subjects re-hospitalized after the initial procedure
Time frame: 30 days, 6 months, 12 months and annually thereafter up to 5 years
Cardiovascular Deaths and Valve-related Deaths
The number of cardiovascular deaths and valve-related deaths
Time frame: 30 days, 6 months, 12 months and annually thereafter up to 5 years
Strokes
The number of subjects with strokes and TIAs
Time frame: 30 days, 6 months, 12 months and annually thereafter up to 5 years
Index Procedure Related Major Adverse Events (MAEs)
Index procedure-related MAE events will be summarized
Time frame: Procedure
Length of Index Procedure Hospital Stay
The length of index procedure hospital stay will be summarized
Time frame: Number of days from admission to discharge
Device Success
Defined as: 1) Successful vascular access, delivery and deployment of the device, and successful retrieval of the delivery system, 2) Correct position of the device in the proper anatomical location (placement in the annulus with no impedance on device function), 3) Intended performance of the prosthetic valve (aortic valve area \> 1.2 cm2 for 26, 29 and 31mm valves, ≥ 0.9 cm2 for 23mm valve (by echocardiography using the continuity equation) and mean aortic valve gradient \< 20 mmHg or peak velocity \< 3 m/sec, without moderate or severe prosthetic valve aortic regurgitation) 4) Only one valve implanted in the proper anatomical location. For TAV in SAV subjects, only # 1, 2 and 4 will be used to calculate device success.
Time frame: Number of days from admission to discharge
Procedural Success
Defined as device success and absence of in-hospital MACCE
Time frame: Number of days from admission to discharge
Evidence of Prosthetic Valve Dysfunction
PVD was defined according to VARC using the site reported echocardiography assessments including aortic regurgitation (AR) and aortic stenosis (AS) evaluations. Total AR reported as moderate or severe was considered PVD. AS was defined as significant stenosis and considered PVD if one of the following was met: •Peak velocity \> 4 m/s •Mean gradient \> 35 mmHg •EOA \< 0.8 cm2 •TVIV1 / TVIV2 \< 0.25
Time frame: 30 days, 6 months, 12 months and annually thereafter up to 5 years