This is a study to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of ADX-N05 compared to placebo in the treatment of excessive daytime sleepiness in adults with narcolepsy.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Enrollment
93
Change From Baseline in the Average Sleep Latency Time (in Minutes) as Determined From the Maintenance of Wakefulness Test (MWT) for ADX-N05 300 mg vs. Placebo at Last Assessment.
The MWT is a validated objective measure of the ability to stay awake for a defined period of time. The primary analysis was a comparison of treatments vs. control groups on change from Baseline to last available post-Baseline assessment (Week 12/Last Assessment) in the average sleep latency time (in minutes) averaged across the first four trials of the MWT using a two-sample t-test.
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 12/Last Assessment post-dose.
Number of Participants With Improved Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C) Scores for ADX-N05 vs. Placebo at Last Assessment
The CGI-C scale rated the change in the participant's condition as compared to the Baseline visit on a 7-point scale ranging from a minimum of "Very much improved" to a maximum of "Very much worse." The proportion of subjects experiencing at least minimal improvement on the CGI-C was calculated and summarized for each of the treatment groups at Week 4 and the last available post-Baseline assessment (Week 12/Last Assessment). The CGI-C scale consists of the following ratings: 1-Very Much improved, 2-Much improved, 3-Minimally improved, 4-No change, 5-Minimally worse, 6-Much worse, 7-Very much worse; a rating of 1 indicates a better outcome, and a rating of 7 indicates a worse outcome. Improvement was defined as a CGI-rating of 1, 2, or 3.
Time frame: Week 12
Change From Baseline in the Average Sleep Latency Time (in Minutes) as Determined From the Maintenance of Wakefulness Test (MWT) (Average of the First Four Trials) Following Four Weeks of Treatment With ADX-N05 150 mg vs. Placebo
The MWT is a validated objective measure of the ability to stay awake for a defined period of time. The MWT consisted of five 40-minute trials separated by 2 hour intervals. This secondary analysis repeated the primary analysis for effects at the end of Week 4.
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 4 post-dose.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Sleep Disorders Center of Alabama
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
Pulmonary Associates
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
Stanford Sleep Medicine Center
Redwood City, California, United States
Pacific Research Network
San Diego, California, United States
Sleep-Alertness Disorders Center
Aurora, Colorado, United States
PAB Clinical Research
Brandon, Florida, United States
Clinical Research Group of St. Petersburg
St. Petersburg, Florida, United States
NeuroTrials Research, Inc.
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Sleep Disorders Center of Georgia
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
SleepMed of Central Georgia
Macon, Georgia, United States
...and 18 more locations
Change From Baseline in Sleep Latency Time (in Minutes) as Determined From Each of the 5 Individual MWT Trials for ADX-N05 vs. Placebo at Week 4
The MWT is a validated objective measure of the ability to stay awake for a defined period of time. The MWT consisted of five 40-minute trials separated by 2 hour intervals. This secondary analysis repeated the primary analysis for effects for the five MWT trials analyzed separately at Week 4.
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 4 post-dose.
Change From Baseline in Sleep Latency Time (in Minutes) as Determined From Each of the 5 Individual MWT Trials for ADX-N05 vs. Placebo at Last Assessment
The MWT is a validated objective measure of the ability to stay awake for a defined period of time. The MWT consisted of five 40-minute trials separated by 2 hour intervals. This secondary analysis repeated the primary analysis for effects for the five MWT trials analyzed separately at the last available post-Baseline assessment (Week 12/Last Assessment).
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 12/Last Assessment post-dose.
Change From Baseline in Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) Scores for ADX-N05 vs. Placebo at Week 4
The ESS is a questionnaire intended to measure daytime sleepiness. In this test, participants answer questions with regard to the level of sleepiness they experienced over approximately the 7 days prior to the assessment while performing eight common, non-stimulating activities. The ESS total score range is 1 to 24. Each activity is rated on a 4-point scale ranging from a minimum of "would never doze" to a maximum of "a high chance of dozing." Thus, the ESS scale range is as follows: 0=would never doze, 1=slight chance of dozing, 2=moderate chance of dozing, 3=high chance of dozing; 0 indicates a better outcome, and 3 indicates a worse outcome. A negative mean change value indicates a decrease in score from baseline and an improvement in daytime sleepiness.
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 4 post-dose.
Change From Baseline in ESS Scores for ADX-N05 vs. Placebo at Last Assessment
The ESS is a questionnaire intended to measure daytime sleepiness. In this test, participants answer questions with regard to the level of sleepiness they experienced over approximately the 7 days prior to the assessment while performing eight common, non-stimulating activities. The ESS total score range is 1 to 24. Each activity is rated on a 4-point scale ranging from a minimum of "would never doze" to a maximum of "a high chance of dozing." Thus, the ESS scale range is as follows: 0=would never doze, 1=slight chance of dozing, 2=moderate chance of dozing, 3=high chance of dozing; 0 indicates a better outcome, and 3 indicates a worse outcome. A negative mean change value indicates a decrease in score from baseline and an improvement in daytime sleepiness.
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 12/Last Assessment post-dose.
Number of Participants With Improved Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C) Scores for ADX-N05 vs. Placebo at Week 4
The CGI-C scale rated the change in the participant's condition as compared to the Baseline visit on a 7-point scale ranging from a minimum of "Very much improved" to a maximum of "Very much worse." The proportion of subjects experiencing at least minimal improvement on the CGI-C was calculated and summarized for each of the treatment groups at Week 4 and the last available post-Baseline assessment (Week 12/Last Assessment). The CGI-C scale consists of the following ratings: 1-Very Much improved, 2-Much improved, 3-Minimally improved, 4-No change, 5-Minimally worse, 6-Much worse, 7-Very much worse; a rating of 1 indicates a better outcome, and a rating of 7 indicates a worse outcome. Improvement was defined as a CGI-rating of 1, 2, or 3.
Time frame: Week 4
Number of Participants With Improved Patient Global Impression Change (PGI-C) Scores for ADX-N05 vs. Placebo at Week 4
The Patient Global Impression - Change (PGI-C) scale was completed by the subject at the Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 12 visits. The CGI-C scale rated the change in the participant's condition as compared to the Baseline visit on a 7-point scale ranging from a minimum of "Very much improved" to a maximum of "Very much worse." The proportion of subjects experiencing at least minimal improvement on the CGI-C was calculated and summarized for each of the treatment groups at Week 4 and the last available post-Baseline assessment (Week 12/Last Assessment). The CGI-C scale consists of the following ratings: 1-Very Much improved, 2-Much improved, 3-Minimally improved, 4-No change, 5-Minimally worse, 6-Much worse, 7-Very much worse; a rating of 1 indicates a better outcome, and a rating of 7 indicates a worse outcome. Improvement was defined as a CGI-rating of 1, 2, or 3.
Time frame: Week 4
Number of Participants With Improved PGI-C Scores for ADX-N05 vs. Placebo at Last Assessment
The Patient Global Impression - Change (PGI-C) scale was completed by the subject at the Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 12 visits. The CGI-C scale rated the change in the participant's condition as compared to the Baseline visit on a 7-point scale ranging from a minimum of "Very much improved" to a maximum of "Very much worse." The proportion of subjects experiencing at least minimal improvement on the CGI-C was calculated and summarized for each of the treatment groups at Week 4 and the last available post-Baseline assessment (Week 12/Last Assessment). The CGI-C scale consists of the following ratings: 1-Very Much improved, 2-Much improved, 3-Minimally improved, 4-No change, 5-Minimally worse, 6-Much worse, 7-Very much worse; a rating of 1 indicates a better outcome, and a rating of 7 indicates a worse outcome. Improvement was defined as a CGI-rating of 1, 2, or 3.
Time frame: Week 12/Last Assessment