Thr purpose of this study is to compare the clinical and radiological results, as well as the femur bone density measurements of two uncemented total hip prostheses during 5 years of follow up.
It is of great importance for the function of uncemented total hip arthroplasty that the anchorage of the prosthesis in the bone of the femur is sufficient. This is of great importance in the prevention of stress shielding of the bone and to insure tranfer of forces from the prosthesis to the femur. The symax hip stem is developed to optimize stress tranfer to bone and insure mechanical stability. In this study the symax hip stem is compared to the HA\_Omnifit hip stem (a frequently used and long term evaluated uncemented hip prosthesis) During the fist two years of follow up DEXA mesurments of bone mineral density are performed. Also patient satisfaction, patient fuction score and radiological evaluation measurements are done during 5 years of follow up. Our primary objective is: comparison of the short term bone remodelling surrounding the Symax hip stem to the short term remodeling surrounding the Stryker Omnifit HA hip stem measured by bone densitometry, clinical and radiographic evaluation.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
50
short term bone remodeling
Bone remodeling is determined by measuring the Bone mineral density during time
Time frame: 6 times within 2 years
complications and reoperations
Reporting all complications and reoperations of the two different hip prostheses
Time frame: during 5 years
clinical performance
Comparison of the clinical performance of the two different hip prostheses
Time frame: 9 times within 5 years
Radiological evaluation
Evaluation of Xrays according to the engh classifications
Time frame: 9 times within 5 years
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.