The aim of this study is to evaluate whether an enhanced strategy of implementation of the new guideline will lower the number of patients getting referred to secondary care spine centres compared to a normal implementation strategy.
Introduction: There is a need for more knowledge on how to introduce new guidelines effectively in general practice. A new low back pain treatment guideline is implemented in Denmark. This guideline demands that patients with low back pain who have not improved after eight weeks of primary care treatment should be referred to a secondary care spine centre. Methods: This is a cluster randomized trial. One hundred general practices define clusters and are randomly allocated to enhanced or usual implementation of the new guideline. The practices are all situated in the North Denmark Region and count two hundred general practitioners (GPs). General practices in the control group will receive normal implementation of the new guideline, which include newsletters and briefings. In contrast the intervention group will receive an enhanced implementation strategy, adding visits from a consultant, two different stratification tools and feedback on guideline compliance. The two stratification tools: The STarT back screening tool (STarT) and a "Social and Occupational Screening" tool (SOS). The two screening tools subgroups patients and aids the clinicians in their choice of treatment. Discussion: To evaluate how change in behaviour may improve guideline adherence and patient treatment we plan two Ph.d. studies in relation to this study; one focusing on the clinical and an one on the economic aspects of the study. In addition a qualitative study is planned for patients refered to specialists in social medicine.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
1,101
Newsletters and Invitation to Meetings
Enhanced guideline implementation strategy
Research Unit for General Practice in the North Denmark Region
Aalborg, Aalborg, Denmark
Referral of patients to a secondary care back centre
Time frame: 12 weeks
Cost-effectiveness
Time frame: 4, 8, and 52 weeks
Roland Morris 23q disability score
Time frame: 4, 8, and 52 weeks
Numerical pain rating
Time frame: 4, 8, and 52 weeks
EQ-5D (Life quality)
Time frame: 4, 8, and 52 weeks
Sick-leave
Time frame: 4, 8, and 52 weeks
Employment status
Time frame: 4, 8, and 52 weeks
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.