Over 1 million people in the UK suffer from untreatable visual impairment, many of them elderly. The major complaint of visually impaired people is their inability to carry out simple tasks, especially those involving reading. It is known that this activity limitation is a major cause of depression in an older population, and it is reflected in reduced quality of life. Low vision clinics, mostly based within hospital ophthalmology departments, dispense optical magnifiers to allow patients to carry out these tasks again, but these devices do have limitations (unusual posture, short working distance, monocular viewing). Although electronic magnifiers have been around since the 1960s, they were initially very large and expensive. Recent advances in technology have brought about an explosion in the number and range of portable and moderately-priced aids, which can be used binocularly, in a natural working position: these are currently not available through the NHS. Evidence is needed as to whether these portable hand-held electronic magnifiers could offer a significant benefit to the majority of patients, and therefore whether they should be routinely dispensed in low vision clinics. The proposed study is a two-arm randomised crossover trial with existing users of optical magnifiers being assigned to use a hand-held electronic magnifier in addition to their existing devices for 2 months. Reading and task performance will be measured with the aid, and compared to the performance with optical aids, and the patient will be asked to report on the comparisons between the aids.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
100
Manchester Royal Eye Hospital
Manchester, United Kingdom
usage of magnifiers
Use of Manchester Low Vision Questionnaire to quantify device usage
Time frame: Change from baseline at 2 months and 4 months
reading speed
Reading speed using the device assessed by MNREAD test
Time frame: Change from baseline at 2 months and 4 months
speed of performance of activities of daily living
total time taken to performance 5 selected activities of daily living using aids if required
Time frame: Change from baseline at 2 months and 4 months
difficulty with near vision activities
Use of NV-VFQ-15 questionnaire to self-rate difficulty in performance of near vision activities
Time frame: Change from baseline at 2 months and 4 months
health related quality of life
Use of EQ-5D and VISQOL questionnaires to self-rate health-related quality of life
Time frame: Change from baseline at 2 months and 4 months
well-being
use of WHO-5 questionnaire to self-rate wellbeing
Time frame: Change from baseline at 2 months and 4 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.