Up to 60 subjects will be enrolled. Enrolled subjects will receive one Ulthera® treatment on the face and neck. Follow-up visits will occur at 90 and 180 days post-treatment. Study images will be obtained pre-treatment, immediately post-treatment, and at each follow-up visit.
This trial is a prospective, single-site, double-blinded, randomized, split-face design. Subjects will be randomized to one of three treatment groups, receiving treatment using different energy levels. Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale scores and patient satisfaction questionnaires will be obtained.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
47
Focused ultrasound energy delivered below the surface of the skin
Ulthera, Inc.
Mesa, Arizona, United States
Subjects' Assessment of Pain During Treatment With Lower Energy Settings
Subjects' sensory response to the Ulthera treatment exposures were recorded using a validated Numeric Rating Scale (NRS,0-10), for each anatomical region treated and energy settings used, with 0 representing no pain and 10 representing the worst pain possible. Pain scores were collected in a consistent manner, following treatment of each section of the face and neck on both sides (submental, submandibular, cheek, periorbital, infraorbital, and forehead), and for each transducer used. Split-face comparisons of pain scores obtained during study treatment by research staff blinded to the energy settings used were completed.
Time frame: Participants were assessed for the duration of study treatment, an average of 75 minutes
Overall Improvement in Skin Laxity on the Face and Neck
A split-face comparison of improvement in overall lifting and tightening of skin was completed by three masked assessors. Pre-treatment and 90 days post-treatment photos from 45 subjects who returned for their 90-day follow-up visit were reviewed, assessing for improvement in skin laxity, i.e., lifted and tightened skin in the areas treated using treatment energy settings based on subjects' assigned study group.
Time frame: 90 days post-treatment
Quantitative Assessment of Brow Lift at 90 Days Post-treatment
Quantitative assessment and analysis of brow lift from baseline to 90 days post-treatment was completed comparing brow lift achieved using standard energy settings compared to adjusted energy settings. The number of subjects with 1 mm or more brow lift is reported. Note: Because the submental region was treated using standard energy settings in all study groups, a quantitative analysis of lift in this region between the study groups would most likely not be informative, and therefore was not completed.
Time frame: 90 days post-treatment
Subject Assessment of Improvement at 90 Days Post-treatment
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Subjects completed a Patient Assessment Questionnaire at 90 days post-treatment by referring to their image in a mirror, their 90-day post-treatment photos, and their pre-treatment photos, and reporting if any improvement was noted on the right and left sides of their face and neck.
Time frame: 90 days post-treatment
Subject Assessment of Improvement at 180 Days Post-treatment
Subjects completed a Patient Assessment Questionnaire at 180 days post-treatment by referring to their image in a mirror, their 180-day post-treatment photos, and their pre-treatment photos, and reporting if any improvement was noted on the right and left sides of their face and neck.
Time frame: 180 days post-treatment