Rationale: Recently our study group reported the results of the Basilar Artery International Cooperation Study (BASICS), a prospective registry of patients with an acute symptomatic basilar artery occlusion (BAO). Our observations in the BASICS registry underscore that we continue to lack a proven treatment modality for patients with an acute BAO and that current clinical practice varies widely. Furthermore, the often-held assumption that intra-arterial thrombolysis (IAT) is superior to intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) in patients with an acute symptomatic BAO is challenged by our data. The BASICS registry was observational and has all the limitations of a non-randomised study. Interpretation of results is hampered by the lack of a standard treatment protocol for all patients who entered the study. Objective: Evaluate the efficacy and safety of IAT in addition to best medical management (BMM) in patients with basilar artery occlusion. Study design: Randomised, multi-centre, open label, controlled phase III, treatment trial. Study population: Patients, aged 18 years and older, with CTA or MRA confirmed basilar occlusion. Intervention: Patients will be randomised between BMM with additional IAT versus BMM alone. IAT has to be initiated within 6 hours from estimated time of BAO. If treated with as part of BMM, IVT should be started within 4.5 hours of estimated time of BAO. Main study parameters/endpoints: Favorable outcome at day 90 defined as a modified Rankin Score (mRS - functional scale) of 0-3.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
282
IA therapy has to be initiated within 6 hours of estimated time of basilar artery occlusion. If an appropriate thrombus or residual stenosis is identified, the choice of IA strategy wil be made by the treating neurointerventionalist. Choice of therapy depends on local approval and experience. If IA thrombolysis is the chosen strategy, a maximum of 22 mg of IA rt-PA or 1.500.000 Units of Urokinase may be given. Stenting is allowed in the presence of a high-grade vertebral artery stenosis or occlusion hampering adequate endovascular access to the basilar artery and in case of a residual high-grade basilar artery stenosis. The use of any other treatment strategy depends on local approval and experience, and is only allowed after prior approval of the steering committee.
Fortaleza General Hospital
Fortaleza, Brazil
RECRUITINGHospital das Clinicas de Ribeirao Preto
Ribeirão Preto, Brazil
RECRUITINGKlinikum Augsburg
Augsburg, Germany
RECRUITINGBerlin Charite Hospital
Berlin, Germany
RECRUITINGDresden University Hospital
Dresden, Germany
RECRUITINGUniversity Medical Center Mannheim
Mannheim, Germany
TERMINATEDOberschwabenklinik
Ravensburg, Germany
TERMINATEDBergamo Hospital
Bergamo, Italy
RECRUITINGGenova Hospital
Genoa, Italy
RECRUITINGUniversity Hospital Modena
Modena, Italy
RECRUITING...and 17 more locations
Favourable outcome
Favourable outcome at day 90 defined as a modified Rankin Score (mRS - functional scale) of 0-3.
Time frame: day 90
Excellent outcome
Excellent outcome at day 90 defined as a modified Rankin Score (mRS - functional scale) of 0-2.
Time frame: day 90
Modified Rankin Score
Modified Rankin Score - not dichotomized.
Time frame: day 90
NIHSS
National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS - acute assessment scale) at timepoints: * directly pre intravenous thrombolysis * directly pre randomization (post intravenous thrombolysis) * at 24 hours +- 6 hours post treatment.
Time frame: pre IVT, pre randomization, 24h post treatment
EQ-5D
EQ-5D (quality of life) at day 90 and at 12 months.
Time frame: day 90 and 12 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.