A Comparison of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Versus Ultrasonic Dissection Assisted Minilaparotomy Cholecystectomy

Kuopio University Hospital88 enrolled

Overview

Minilaparatomy cholecystectomy with ultrasonic dissection (UsD) is rarely considered and therefore we investigate here the contributions of UsD in early recovery.

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Purpose

TREATMENT

Masking

NONE

Enrollment

Conditions

Postoperative Pain

Interventions

Minilaparotomy vs laparoscopyPROCEDURE

MC-group will undergo ultrasonic dissection assisted minilaparotomy cholecystectomy ans patients in the LC-grout will undergo laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Eligibility

Sex: ALLMin age: 18 YearsMax age: 75 Years

Medical Language ↔ Plain English

Inclusion Criteria:- Uncomplicted symptomatic cholelithiasis cholecystitis confirmed by ultrasoud * ASA physical status 1-3 * Body mass index 18-30 * AGE 18 - 75 years Exclusion Criteria: * Pregnancy or lactating * common bile-duct stones * acute cholecystitis * previous upper abdominal operation * Chirrosis * Renal disease * Pancreatitis * ASA 4-5 * Participation of any other clinical trial within 30 days before the start of the screening period * History of uncontrolled cardiovascular, epileptic disorder, psychosis.

Locations (1)

Kuopio University Hospital

Kuopio, Finland

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Early recovery

Post operative pain, wound infections, bile leak, mean length of sick leave days, use of analgesics the success of day-surgery

Time frame: One month

Secondary Outcomes

Peroperative outcome

Operative time, time at the operation theatre, bleeding, length of skin incision

Time frame: 24 hours

Data from ClinicalTrials.gov

This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.