The purpose of this study is to determine if tailoring multiple sessions of upper extremity robotic therapy to focus on a particular aspect of movement (e.g smoothness vs. aiming; active range of motion vs. functional practice)can optimize therapeutic results and lead to greater functional returns in arm mobility after stroke.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Interactive Motion Technologies (IMT) planar and wrist robots for robotic arm therapy
Feinstein Institute for Medical Research
Manhasset, New York, United States
Change from baseline in Upper Extremity Fugl Meyer Motor Assessment
Time frame: 12 weeks (immediately following the intervention) and 24 weeks (3 months after the intervention)
Change from baseline in Kinematic Data
Kinematic Data recorded during therapy with IMT robots
Time frame: 12 weeks (immediately following the intervention) and 24 weeks (3 months after the intervention)
Change from baseline in Fugl Meyer Sensation Scale
Time frame: 12 weeks (immediately following the intervention) and 24 weeks (3 months after the intervention)
Change from baseline in Fugl Meyer Proprioception Scale
Time frame: 12 weeks (immediately following the intervention) and 24 weeks (3 months after the intervention)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.