This study was to provide 24 - 52 week efficacy, safety and tolerability data to support the registration of the secukinumab (AIN457) prefilled syringe (PFS) for subcutaneous self administration in subjects with active PsA despite current or previous NSAID, DMARD and/or anti-TNFα therapy. An additional 4 years of long-term efficacy and safety data were collected during the post Week 52 period of the study.
At baseline (BSL), subjects whose eligibility was confirmed were randomized to one of the following four treatment groups. * 75 mg secukinumab * 150 mg secukinumab * 300 mg secukinumab * Placebo At Week 16, all subjects were classified as responders (≥ 20% improvement from BSL in both tender and swollen joint counts) or non-responders. Subjects who were randomized to a secukinumab treatment group at baseline were targeted to remain on the same dose for the entire trial. Subjects who were randomized to placebo at baseline were re-randomized at Week 16 as follows: Placebo non-responders received secukinumab 150 mg s.c. or 300 mg s.c. (1:1) every 4 weeks, starting after the efficacy assessments at Week 16. Placebo responders continued to receive placebo at Week 16 and Week 20 and received secukinumab 150 mg s.c. or 300 mg s.c. (1:1) every 4 weeks, starting after the efficacy assessments at Week 24. This was a double-blind, double-dummy, randomized treatment trial until week 52 analysis was completed and open label afterwards. An amendment to the study protocol (after all patients were in the trial for 2-3 years) introduced changes whereby patients previously treated with secukinumab 75 mg s.c. could change to receive 150 mg s.c. or 300 mg s.c., and patients previously treated with secukinumab 150 mg s.c. could change to receive 300 mg s.c., as deemed appropriate by the investigators.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Enrollment
397
Secukinumab (AIN457)
Placebo PFS for s.c. administration.
Number of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20 (ACR20) Response Criteria
ACR20 response was defined as having a positive clinical response to treatment (individual improvement) in disease activity if the participant had at least 20% improvement in tender 68-joint count, swollen 66-joint count and at least 3 of the following 5 measures: patient's assessment of RA pain, patient's global assessment of disease activity, physician's global assessment of disease activity, subject self-assessed disability (Health Assessment Questionnaire \[HAQ-DI\] score), and/or acute phase reactant (high sensitivity c-reactive protein (hsCRP) or erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR). For subjects with early escape at Week 16 or had missing values at Week 24 or discontinued prior to Week 24, their ACR20 was set to nonresponse at Week 24. This applied for all treatment regimens in order to minimize bias. The Placebo arm was analyzed as one group, irrespective of the re-randomization, as assessments made under the re-randomized active treatment were not included in this analysis.
Time frame: Week 24
Number of Participants Achieving a PASI75 Response in the Subgroup of Subjects Who Have ≥3% Skin Involvement With Psoriasis
PASI is a combined assessment of a lesion severity and affected area into a single score: 0 (no disease) to 72 (maximal disease). The body is divided into 4 areas for scoring (head, arms, trunk, legs; each area is scored by itself and scores are combined for a final PASI. For each area, percent of skin involved is estimated: 0 (0%) to 6 (90-100%), and severity is estimated by clinical signs, erythema, induration and desquamation; scale 0 (none) to 4 (maximum). Final PASI = sum of severity parameters for each area \* area score weight of section (head: 0.1, arms: 0.2, body: 0.3, legs: 0.4). PASI 75 response was defined as participants achieving \>= 75% improvement from baseline. For subjects with early escape at Week 16 or had missing values at Week 24 or discontinued prior to Week 24, their value was set to nonresponse at Week 24. This applied for all treatment regimens in order to minimize bias.
Time frame: Week 24
Number of Participants Achieving a PASI90 Response in the Subgroup of Subjects Who Have ≥3% Skin Involvement With Psoriasis
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Novartis Investigative Site
Peoria, Arizona, United States
Novartis Investigative Site
Aventura, Florida, United States
Novartis Investigative Site
Palm Harbor, Florida, United States
Novartis Investigative Site
Sarasota, Florida, United States
Novartis Investigative Site
Tamarac, Florida, United States
Novartis Investigative Site
Tampa, Florida, United States
Novartis Investigative Site
Zephyrhills, Florida, United States
Novartis Investigative Site
Lincoln, Nebraska, United States
Novartis Investigative Site
Omaha, Nebraska, United States
Novartis Investigative Site
Freehold, New Jersey, United States
...and 66 more locations
PASI is a combined assessment of a lesion severity and affected area into a single score: 0 (no disease) to 72 (maximal disease). The body is divided into 4 areas for scoring (head, arms, trunk, legs; each area is scored by itself and scores are combined for a final PASI. For each area, percent of skin involved is estimated: 0 (0%) to 6 (90-100%), and severity is estimated by clinical signs, erythema, induration and desquamation; scale 0 (none) to 4 (maximum). Final PASI = sum of severity parameters for each area \* area score weight of section (head: 0.1, arms: 0.2, body: 0.3, legs: 0.4). PASI 90 response was defined as participants achieving \>= 90% improvement from baseline. For subjects with early escape at Week 16 or had missing values at Week 24 or discontinued prior to Week 24, their value was set to nonresponse at Week 24. This applied for all treatment regimens in order to minimize bias.
Time frame: Week 24
Change From Baseline in DAS28-CRP
The DAS28 is a measure of disease activity based on Swollen and Tender Joint Counts, ESR or CRP and the Patient Global Assessment. A DAS28 score \> 5.1 implies active disease, ≤ 3.2 low disease activity, and \< 2.6 remission. The score can range from 0 - 9.4. The data collected after the patient switched to secukinumab were treated as missing for placebo patients and were analyzed using a mixed-effects repeated measures model. For secukinumab patients, the actual values were used in the analysis. The Placebo arm was analyzed as one group, irrespective of the re-randomization, as assessments made under the re-randomized active treatment were not included in this analysis.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
Change From Baseline in SF36-Physical Component Score
The SF-36 is an instrument to measure health-related quality of life among healthy patients and patients with acute and chronic conditions. Score range is from 0 (no problems) to 100 (unable to perform the activity). SF-36 is a 36 item questionnaire which measures Quality of Life across eight domains, which are both physically and emotionally based. Two overall summary scores, the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) can be computed. In this study, SF-36 PCS was used. The Placebo arm was analyzed as one group, irrespective of the re-randomization, as assessments made under the re-randomized active treatment were not included in this analysis.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
Change From Baseline in Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI)
The HAQ-DI assesses a subject's level of functional ability and includes questions of fine movements of the upper extremity, locomotor activities of the lower extremity, and activities that involve both upper and lower extremities. There are 20 questions in 8 categories of functioning including dressing, rising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and usual activities. The stem of each item asks 'Over the past week, "are you able to..." perform a particular task'. Each item is scored on a 4 point scale from 0 - 3, representing normal, no difficulty (0), some difficulty (1), much difficulty (2) and unable to do (3). The disability index score is calculated as the mean of the available category scores, ranging from 0 to 3. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. The Placebo arm was analyzed as one group, irrespective of the re-randomization, as assessments made under the re-randomized active treatment were not included in this analysis.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
Number of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50 (ACR50) Response Criteria
ACR20 response was defined as having a positive clinical response to treatment (individual improvement) in disease activity if the participant had at least 50% improvement in tender 68-joint count, swollen 66-joint count and at least 3 of the following 5 measures: patient's assessment of RA pain, patient's global assessment of disease activity, physician's global assessment of disease activity, subject self-assessed disability (Health Assessment Questionnaire \[HAQ-DI\] score), and/or acute phase reactant (high sensitivity c-reactive protein (hsCRP) or erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR). For subjects with early escape at Week 16 or had missing values at Week 24 or discontinued prior to Week 24, their ACR20 was set to nonresponse at Week 24. This applied for all treatment regimens in order to minimize bias. The Placebo arm was analyzed as one group, irrespective of the re-randomization, as assessments made under the re-randomized active treatment were not included in this analysis.
Time frame: Week 24
Number of Participants With Dactylitis in the Subset of Subjects Who Had Dactylitis at Baseline
Resolution of dactylitis was evaluated in the subset of patients who had disease activity at baseline. In this analysis, a lower percentage is desirable and resolution is defined as complete absence of the symptom. For subjects with early escape at Week 16 or had missing values at Week 24 or discontinued prior to Week 24, their assessment was set to nonresponse at Week 24 (presence of dactylitis). This applied for all treatment regimens in order to minimize bias. The Placebo arm was analyzed as one group, irrespective of the re-randomization, as assessments made under the re-randomized active treatment were not included in this analysis.
Time frame: Week 24
Number of Participants With Enthesitis in the Subset of Subjects Who Had Enthesitis at Baseline
Resolution of enthesitis was evaluated in the subset of patients who had disease activity at baseline. In this analysis, a lower percentage is desirable and resolution is defined as complete absence of the symptom. For subjects with early escape at Week 16 or had missing values at Week 24 or discontinued prior to Week 24, their assessment was set to nonresponse at Week 24 (presence of enthesitis). This applied for all treatment regimens in order to minimize bias. The Placebo arm was analyzed as one group, irrespective of the re-randomization, as assessments made under the re-randomized active treatment were not included in this analysis.
Time frame: Week 24