The purpose of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of omarigliptin compared to placebo in participants with inadequate glycemic control on metformin monotherapy. The primary hypothesis is that after 24 weeks, the addition of treatment with omarigliptin provides greater reduction in hemoglobin A1c (A1C) than placebo.
Participants received blinded omarigliptin or matching placebo to omarigliptin for 104 weeks. During the first 24 weeks (Phase A) they did not receive any other blinded study medication. In Phase B (subsequent 80 weeks), participants who did not initiate glycemic rescue in Phase A received additional blinded study medication: participants in the omarigliptin group received placebo to glimepiride and participants in the placebo group received glimepiride.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Enrollment
402
Omarigliptin 25 mg capsule administered orally once weekly (preferably on the same day of each week)
Matching placebo to omarigliptin capsule administered orally once weekly (preferably on the same day of each week)
Glimepiride 1 or 2 mg tablet/capsule administered orally once daily and up-titrated to a maximum dose of 6 mg daily. Participants rescued with open-label glimepiride during Phase A will not receive glimepiride or matching placebo to glimepiride during Phase B.
Matching placebo to glimepiride tablet/capsule administered orally once daily and up-titrated to a mock maximum dose of 6 mg daily. Participants rescued with open-label glimepiride during Phase A will not receive glimepiride or matching placebo to glimepiride during Phase B.
During Phase B of the study, participants who received a maximum up-titration of open-label glimepiride or blinded glimepiride/matching placebo to glimepiride, may be rescued with open-label insulin glargine.
Participants continue stable pre-study dose of metformin tablet(s) administered orally (\>= 1500 mg daily) throughout the study.
Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (A1C) at Week 24 (Phase A)
A1C is measured as a percent. Change from baseline in A1C at Week 24 was analyzed using a constrained longitudinal data analysis (cLDA) method with a restriction of the same baseline mean across treatment groups. The cLDA model included terms for treatment, time, and the interaction of time by treatment.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
Percentage of Participants Who Experienced at Least One Adverse Event (Phase A+B)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. Presented data exclude data after glycemic rescue.
Time frame: Up to 107 weeks
Percentage of Participants Who Discontinued Study Drug Due to an Adverse Event (Phase A+B)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. Presented data exclude data after glycemic rescue.
Time frame: Up to 104 weeks
Percentage of Participants Who Experienced an Adverse Event Which Were Included Under the System Order Class of Investigations (Phase A+B)
The following laboratory parameters were included: blood chemistry, hematology, electrocardiograms, lipids, body weight, and vital signs.
Time frame: Up to 104 weeks
Change From Baseline in 2-hour Post-meal Glucose (PMG) at Week 24 (Phase A)
Change from baseline in 2-hour PMG at Week 24 was analyzed using cLDA method with a restriction of the same baseline mean across treatment groups. The cLDA model included terms for treatment, time, and the interaction of time by treatment.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Week 24 (Phase A)
Change from baseline in FPG at Week 24 was analyzed using cLDA method with a restriction of the same baseline mean across treatment groups. The cLDA model included terms for treatment, time, and the interaction of time by treatment.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
Change From Baseline in A1C at Week 104 (Phase A+B)
A1C is measured as a percent. Change from baseline in A1C at Week 104 was analyzed using cLDA method with a restriction of the same baseline mean across treatment groups. The cLDA model included terms for treatment, time, and the interaction of time by treatment.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 104
Change From Baseline in FPG at Week 104 (Phase A+B)
Change from baseline in FPG at Week 104 was analyzed using cLDA method with a restriction of the same baseline mean across treatment groups. The cLDA model included terms for treatment, time, and the interaction of time by treatment.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 104
Percentage of Participants Attaining A1C Glycemic Goals of <7.0% After 24 Weeks of Treatment (Phase A)
Percentage of participants attaining A1C glycemic goals of \<7.0% (53 mmol/mol) after 24 weeks of treatment estimated using standard multiple imputation techniques.
Time frame: 24 weeks
Percentage of Participants Attaining A1C Glycemic Goals of <6.5% After 24 Weeks of Treatment (Phase A)
Percentage of participants attaining A1C glycemic goals of \<6.5% (48 mmol/mol) after 24 weeks of treatment estimated using standard multiple imputation techniques.
Time frame: 24 weeks
Percentage of Participants Attaining A1C Glycemic Goals of <7% After 104 Weeks of Treatment (Phase A+B)
Percentage of participants attaining A1C glycemic goals of \<7.0% (53 mmol/mol) after 104 weeks of treatment estimated using standard multiple imputation techniques.
Time frame: 104 weeks
Percentage of Participants Attaining A1C Glycemic Goals of <6.5% After 104 Weeks of Treatment (Phase A+B)
Percentage of participants attaining A1C glycemic goals of \<6.5% (48 mmol/mol) after 104 weeks of treatment estimated using standard multiple imputation techniques.
Time frame: 104 weeks
Change From Baseline in PMG Total Area Under the Plasma Concentration Time Curve (AUC) at Week 24 (Phase A)
Change from baseline in PMG total AUC at Week 24 based on a cLDA model including terms for treatment, time, and the interaction of time by treatment. Plasma glucose levels were measured before the meal (0 minutes), and at 60 and 120 minutes after the meal.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
Change From Baseline in Fasting Insulin at Week 24 (Phase A)
Change from baseline in fasting insulin at Week 24 based on a cLDA model including terms for treatment, time, and the interaction of time by treatment.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
Change From Baseline in Fasting Insulin at Week 104 (Phase A+B)
Change from baseline in fasting insulin at Week 104 based on a cLDA model including terms for treatment, time, and the interaction of time by treatment.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 104
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Cumulative Incidence of Participants Requiring Glycemic Rescue Therapy by 24 Weeks (Phase A)
Participants who did not meet progressively stricter glycemic criteria in Phase A had rescue initiated with open-label glimepiride.
Time frame: Up to 24 weeks
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Cumulative Incidence of Participants Requiring Glycemic Rescue Therapy by 104 Weeks (Phase A+B)
Participants who did not meet progressively stricter glycemic criteria in Phase A had rescue initiated with open-label glimepiride. If during Phase B participants on open-label glimepiride or blinded glimepiride/glimepiride matching placebo needed rescue after maximum up-titration, then insulin glargine was initiated and the dose of open-label glimepiride or blinded glimepiride/glimepiride-matching placebo was discontinued.
Time frame: Up to 104 weeks
Percentage of Participants Requiring Glycemic Rescue Therapy at or Before Week 24 (Phase A)
Data presented are a cumulative incidence of participants with glycemic rescue by Week 24.
Time frame: Up to 24 weeks
Percentage of Participants Requiring Glycemic Rescue Therapy at or Before Week 104 (Phase A+B)
Data presented are a cumulative incidence of participants with glycemic rescue by Week 104.
Time frame: Up to 104 weeks
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.