Fracture healing is a complex physiological process caused by interaction of cellular elements, cytokines and signaling proteins, which results in the formation of new bone (Gerstenfeld et al., 2003). Depending on fracture site, complexity, co-morbidities and other factors, 10% of all fractures will eventually fail to unite. Non-union fractures are defined as fractures that are at least six to nine months old and in which there have been no signs of healing for the last three months. Various causes have been evoked for impaired healing in hypotrophic (atrophic and oligotrophic) non-unions, including poor fracture stabilization, local infection and failure of the osteoblastic cells to multiply. Currently the treatment of choice for non-unions, particularly atrophic non-unions, is bone autograft (or allograft), combined or not with intramedullary nailing, plating, and external fixation devices (Kanakaris et al., 2007). This procedure produces good results but requires an invasive surgery of several hours under general anesthesia and a few days of hospitalization. Because of this, major complications have been reported in up to 20-30% of patients (Pieske et al., 2009, Zimmerman et al., 2009). This Phase 2b/3 study aims at demonstrating the safety and efficacy of PREOB®, a proprietary population of autologous osteoblastic cells, in the treatment of hypotrophic non-union fractures of long bones. PREOB® will be compared to Bone Autograft in a non-inferiority design.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
5
Investigating site BE01
Anderlecht, Belgium
Investigating site BE05
Bruges, Belgium
Investigating site BE09
Brussels, Belgium
Investigating site BE02
Charleroi, Belgium
Investigating site BE04
Genk, Belgium
Investigating site BE06
Ghent, Belgium
Investigating site BE07
Hasselt, Belgium
Investigating site BE08
Mons, Belgium
Investigating site BE03
Ottignies, Belgium
Investigating site FR01
Amiens, France
...and 6 more locations
Global Disease Evaluation as perceived by the patient using a Visual Analogue Scale
Time frame: 12 months
Radiological healing progression using the RUS(T) as assessed by CT scan
Time frame: 12 months
Potential occurrence of any AE or SAE, related to the product or to the procedure, using patient open non-directive questionnaire, physical examination and laboratory measurements
Time frame: 12 months
Pain using a Visual Analogue Scale
Time frame: 12 months
Weight-bearing using Likert Scale
Time frame: 12 months
Well-being score as assessed by the SF-12 questionnaire
Time frame: 12 months
Radiological improvement using the RUS(T) as assessed by X-ray
Time frame: 12 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.