This is a device evaluation study to determine the optimal stimulation characteristics for using vibrotactile stimulation as a sensory triggering device for self retraining in patients with chronic moderate to severe dysphagia. Stimulation characteristics to be tested are frequency of vibration, pressure between the device and the skin, mode of vibration (pulsed or continuous).
Participants were recruited who had chronic moderate to severe dysphagia following stroke or radiation treatment for head and neck cancer. Their frequency of swallowing was transduced with an accelerometer placed on the skin over the thyroid cartilage and inductive plethysmography bands placed over the rib cage and abdomen. When laryngeal elevation coincided with respiratory apnea a swallow was marked. Five different motor frequencies were evaluated to determine their effect on participants frequency of swallowing (swallows per minute). Frequencies were 30, 70, 110, and 150 Hz and a combination of 70 and 110 Hz. For each vibratory frequency the number of swallows per minute occurring during stimulation was compared with sham when the participant was wearing the device but the motor was not turned on. The frequency fo swallowing during stimulation was compared with the frequency of swallowing between stimulations. Visual analogue ratings of the urge to swallow and discomfort were also measured after each condition. Other parameters were the pressure between the motor and the skin (0, 2, 4, and 6 kPa) and swallow initiation time when stimulation was on and when it was not. Swallowing frequency with continuous versus pulsed stimulation was also compared.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
13
Comparison of the effects of different vibratory characteristics on the frequency of swallowing, time of initiation of swallowing with stimulation and urge to swallow. Will compare frequency of vibration, mode of vibration, pressure of device against neck, and duration of vibration. Each session will last no more than 1 hour with short breaks. Each participant can volunteer for up to three nonconsecutive sessions.
James Madison University and Rockingham Memorial Hospital
Harrisonburg, Virginia, United States
Change in Swallow Frequency 30 Hz
Change in number of swallows per minute during stimulation minus swallows per minute during sham (wearing the device but no stimulation)
Time frame: During one session within 1 hour
Change in Swallow Frequency 70 Hz
Change in number of swallows per minute during stimulation minus swallows per minute during sham (wearing the device but no stimulation)
Time frame: During one session within 1 hour
Change in Swallow Frequency 110 Hz
Change in number of swallows per minute during stimulation minus swallows per minute during sham (wearing the device but no stimulation)
Time frame: During one session within 1 hour
Change in Swallow Frequency 150 Hz
Change in number of swallows per minute during stimulation minus swallows per minute during sham (wearing the device but no stimulation)
Time frame: During one session within 1 hour
Change in Swallowing Frequency 70 & 110 Hz
Change in number of swallows per minute during stimulation minus swallows per minute during sham (wearing the device but no stimulation)
Time frame: During one session within 1 hour
Change in Urge to Swallow After 30 Hz Stimulation
At the end of each stimulation session participants marked on a visual analogue scale (VAS) their perceived urge to swallow between a minimum of 1 with no urge to swallow and a maximum of 100 which is the highest urge to swallow possible. The Change in perceived urge to swallow when stimulation was presented minus the perceived urge to swallow following no stimulation was computed.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: During one session within 1 hour
Change in Urge to Swallow 70 Hz
At the end of each stimulation session participants marked on a visual analogue scale (VAS) their perceived urge to swallow between a minimum of 1 with no urge to swallow and a maximum of 100 which is the highest urge to swallow possible. The Change in perceived urge to swallow when stimulation was presented minus the perceived urge to swallow following no stimulation was computed.
Time frame: During one session within 1 hour
Change in VAS Urge to Swallow 110 Hz
At the end of each stimulation session participants marked on a visual analogue scale (VAS) their perceived urge to swallow between a minimum of 1 with no urge to swallow and a maximum of 100 which is the highest urge to swallow possible. The Change in perceived urge to swallow when stimulation was presented minus the perceived urge to swallow following no stimulation was computed.
Time frame: During one session within 1 hour
Change in VAS Urge to Swallow 150 Hz
At the end of each stimulation session participants marked on a visual analogue scale (VAS) their perceived urge to swallow between a minimum of 1 with no urge to swallow and a maximum of 100 which is the highest urge to swallow possible. The Change in perceived urge to swallow when stimulation was presented minus the perceived urge to swallow following no stimulation was computed.
Time frame: During one session within 1 hour
Change in VAS Urge to Swallow 70 & 110 Hz
At the end of each stimulation session participants marked on a visual analogue scale (VAS) their perceived urge to swallow between a minimum of 1 with no urge to swallow and a maximum of 100 which is the highest urge to swallow possible. The Change in perceived urge to swallow when stimulation was presented minus the perceived urge to swallow following no stimulation was computed.
Time frame: During one session within 1 hour
Change in Discomfort Level 30 Hz
At the end of each stimulation session participants marked on a visual analogue scale (VAS) their perceived discomfort between a minimum of 1 with no discomfort and a maximum of 100 which is the highest discomfort possible. The Change in perceived discomfort when stimulation was presented minus the perceived discomfort following no stimulation was computed.
Time frame: During one session within 1 hour
Change in Discomfort 70 Hz
At the end of each stimulation session participants marked on a visual analogue scale (VAS) their perceived discomfort between a minimum of 1 with no discomfort and a maximum of 100 which is the highest discomfort possible. The Change in perceived discomfort when stimulation was presented minus the perceived discomfort following no stimulation was computed.
Time frame: During one session within 1 hour
Change in Discomfort 110 Hz
At the end of each stimulation session participants marked on a visual analogue scale (VAS) their perceived discomfort between a minimum of 1 with no discomfort and a maximum of 100 which is the highest discomfort possible. The Change in perceived discomfort when stimulation was presented minus the perceived discomfort following no stimulation was computed.
Time frame: During one session within 1 hour
Change in Discomfort 150 Hz
At the end of each stimulation session participants marked on a visual analogue scale (VAS) their perceived discomfort between a minimum of 1 with no discomfort and a maximum of 100 which is the highest discomfort possible. The Change in perceived discomfort when stimulation was presented minus the perceived discomfort following no stimulation was computed.
Time frame: During one session within 1 hour
Change in Discomfort 70 & 110 Hz
At the end of each stimulation session participants marked on a visual analogue scale (VAS) their perceived discomfort between a minimum of 1 with no discomfort and a maximum of 100 which is the highest discomfort possible. The Change in perceived discomfort when stimulation was presented minus the perceived discomfort following no stimulation was computed.
Time frame: During one session within 1 hour
Change in Swallowing Frequency 2 kPa
The pressure between the neck band and the skin was set and the changes in swallowing frequency was compared between pressure between increased pressure and no pressure condition
Time frame: During one session within 1 hour
Change in Swallow Frequency 4 kPa
The pressure between the neck band and the skin was set and the changes in swallowing frequency was compared between pressure between increased pressure and no pressure condition
Time frame: During one session within 1 hour
Change in Swallow Frequency 6 kPa
The pressure between the neck band and the skin was set and the changes in swallowing frequency was compared between increased pressure and no pressure condition
Time frame: During one session within 1 hour
Percent Change in Swallow Frequency Pulse vs Continuous
Percent Change= \[(Number of swallows per minute from continuous stimulation -number of swallows per minute during pulsed stimulation) / number of swallows per minute during pulsed stimulation\] X 100
Time frame: During one session within one hour
Change in Swallow Initiation Time
Change in swallow initiation time (ms) from swallow reaction time during vibrotactile stimulation minus reaction time with sham (no) stimulation
Time frame: During one session within 1 hour