The lifetime risk for a woman to undergo surgery for either vaginal prolapse or urinary incontinence is high. Previous studies have shown that pregnancy and childbirth are risk factors for developing prolapse. There is a lack of studies that follow women several years after delivery aiming to find whether symptoms of prolapse are linked to delivery method, ie vacuum, forceps, normal vaginal delivery and cesarean section. The investigators plan this study is to get more knowledge about pathology of prolapse and incontinence, to enable development of preventive strategies for these conditions. Aim of the study is to determine whether the prevalence of symptoms and performed surgery for urogenital prolapse differs among women delivered by vacuum, forceps, normal vaginal delivery and cesarean section 15-20 years after their first delivery. The investigators identify women that delivered their first child at St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim, Norway between 1990-1997. Questionnaires will be sent to 2500 women (PFIQ-7, PFDI-20, PISQ-12), 600 of whom will get a clinical examination, where pelvic floor musculature is examined by palpation and 4D ultrasound, and a POP-Q quantification of prolapse performed.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
1,641
vaginal delivery by forceps extraction
vaginal delivery by vacuum extraction
St Olavs Hospital Trondheim University Hospital
Trondheim, Norway
symptoms of urogenital prolapse
Time frame: 15-20 years after first delivery
surgery for urogenital prolapse
Time frame: 15-20 years after first delivery
damage to pelvic floor musculature
Time frame: 15-20 years after first delivery
urinary incontinence
Time frame: 15-20 years after first delivery
anal incontinence
Time frame: 15-20 years after first delivery
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.