The purpose of this research study is to compare the effects (good and bad) on subjects and their cancer using standard chemotherapy in combination with hypofractionated proton radiation therapy. Hypofractionation is a technique that delivers higher daily doses of radiation over a shorter period of time.
Conventional fractionated photon-based radiotherapy to 60-63 Gy at 1.8-2 Gy/fraction with concurrent chemotherapy remains the standard treatment practice in patients with stage III non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) with local control rates of approximately 50% and a median overall survival of just 18 months.Unfortunately, even the standard treatment has significant toxicity with approximately 40% of patients developing grade 3 or higher acute toxicities in the RTOG 9410 study.1 These outcomes are poor and more effective treatment regimens are needed. Higher doses of radiation have been hypothesized to improve local control in patients with stage III NSCLC. This is expected to translate into better overall survival.Given the significant improvements in outcome in patients receiving hypofractionation for stage I NSCLC, perhaps similar gains could be achieved if hypofractionated radiotherapy could be safely delivered to stage II-III NSCLC with concurrent chemotherapy. Hypofractionated radiotherapy may offer improvement in local control compared with conventional fractionation that may translate into improved overall survival. Furthermore, hypofractionation will shorten the time interval during which patients are receiving less aggressive chemotherapy. Proton therapy is a highly conformal radiotherapy technique that takes advantage of the proton's characteristic Bragg Peak, resulting in significant reductions in the exit dose of the treatment beam. Thus, proton therapy can substantially reduce the dose to critical structures even compared with IMRT. This study will investigate the safety and efficacy of delivering hypofractionated proton therapy with concurrent chemotherapy in patients with stage II-III NSCLC
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
32
RADIATION: Proton Radiotherapy Dose Level 1: 60 Gy (RBE) at 2.5 Gy(RBE) per fraction x 24 fractions Dose Level 2: 60 Gy (RBE) at 3 Gy (RBE) per fraction x 20 fractions Dose Level 3: 60.01 Gy (RBE) at 3.53 Gy (RBE) per fraction x 17 fractions Dose Level 4: 60 Gy (RBE) at 4 Gy (RBE) per fraction x 15 fractions CONCURRENT CHEMOTHERAPY: Paclitaxel at a dose of 45 mg/m2 and Carboplatin at a dose of AUC 2 mg/min/ml (a total of 3-5 weekly doses) OR Cisplatin 50mg/m2 days 1, 8, 29, and 36 and Etoposide 50mg/m2 days 1-5, 29-33. For non squamous histology, Carboplatin AUC 5 on day 1 and Pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 on day 1 every 21 days OR Cisplatin 75 mg/m2 on day 1 and Pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 on day 1 every 21 days. Adjuvant chemotherapy is optional.
University of Florida Proton Therapy Institute
Jacksonville, Florida, United States
Northwestern Medicine Chicago Proton Center
Warrenville, Illinois, United States
Maryland Proton Treatment Center
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Princeton ProCure Management LLC
Somerset, New Jersey, United States
Phase I: Establish the maximum tolerated dose of radiotherapy in terms of Gy (RBE)/fraction using hypofractionated proton therapy concurrently with chemotherapy.
This phase will have a minimum of 2 treated patients and we anticipate that the MTD will be located before a maximum of 28 patients are treated. The trial begins by treating 5 patients at 2.5 Gy (RBE)/fraction to a dose of 60 Gy (RBE).
Time frame: Weekly until completion of radiation treatment
Phase II: Determine the percentage of patients that survive at least 12 months
Time frame: At 12 months
Assess acute and late adverse events of concurrent chemotherapy with hypofractionated proton therapy.
Time frame: On average every 3 months for 5 years
Analyze for disease control and overall survival.
Time frame: At 2 years and 5 years
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Oklahoma Proton Center
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States
Hampton University Proton Therapy Institute
Hampton, Virginia, United States