This phase II trial studies how well lenalidomide (LEN) and eltrombopag olamine (ELT) work in treating patients with symptomatic anemia in low or intermediate myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). Lenalidomide may stimulate the immune system in different ways and stop cancer cells from growing. Eltrombopag olamine may increase the number of white blood cells and platelets found in bone marrow or peripheral blood. Giving lenalidomide and eltrombopag olamine may be an effective treatment for myelodysplastic syndrome.
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES (not Outcome Measures): I. To evaluate the rate of hematologic improvement of the eltrombopag (eltrombopag olamine)/lenalidomide combination (as per Modified International Working Group \[IWG\] criteria). II. To evaluate the safety and tolerability of the combination. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES (not Outcome Measures): I. To compare the time to hematologic improvement. II. To evaluate the duration of hematologic improvement III. To evaluate the effect of combination treatment on platelet counts, platelet transfusions and bleeding events. IV. To evaluate the frequency of bone marrow response (complete response \[CR\] + partial response \[PR\]) and cytogenetic response. V. To evaluate the relationship between mutations in bone marrow stem cells and response. VI. To evaluate the relationship between various stem and progenitor alterations and response. OUTLINE: Patients are initially assigned to 1 of 2 treatment arms. ARM A: Patients with platelet counts \>= 50,000 receive lenalidomide orally (PO) daily or every other day (QOD) on days 1-21. If platelet counts fall below 50,000, patients discontinue lenalidomide and receive eltrombopag olamine PO daily or QOD until platelet count is maintained above 50,000 for 2 weeks. Patients then resume lenalidomide PO daily or QOD. If platelets fall below 50,000 again, patients receive eltrombopag olamine as before. When platelet counts are maintained above 50,000 for 2 weeks, patients resume lenalidomide concurrently with eltrombopag for all subsequent courses. ARM B: Patients with platelet counts \< 50,000 receive eltrombopag olamine PO daily or QOD on days 1-28 until platelet counts is maintained above 50,000 for 2 weeks. Patients then receive treatment as in Arm A. In both arms, treatment repeats every 28 days for 4 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up every 3 months for 2 years, every 6 months for 3 years, and then every 12 months for 5 years. Eligible patients with a diagnosis of MDS or non-proliferative chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) (WBC ≤ 12,000/mL) of at least 3-month duration according to WHO criteria and International Prognostic Scoring System categories of low or intermediate-1-risk disease. Patients either had symptomatic anemia untransfused with hemoglobin ≤ 10 g/dL in the 8 weeks before starting the study or had RBC transfusion dependence (i.e., ≥ 2 units/mo) confirmed 8 weeks before starting the study and/or PLTs \<50,000 k/uL with hemoglobin \>10.0 g/dL. Patients must not have received prior therapy with LEN (for \> 2 months) nor ELT
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
52
University of Kansas Cancer Center
Kansas City, Kansas, United States
Albert Einstein College of Medicine
The Bronx, New York, United States
Number of Patients Demonstrating Overall Hematologic Improvement (HI)
The number of patients demonstrating overall Hematologic Improvement (HI) was assessed based on the MDS 2006 IWG criteria. The IWG criteria for HI define specific responses of cytopenia in the 3 hematopoietic lineages: erythroid (HI-E), platelet (HI-P), and neutrophil (HI-N) as demonstrated in corresponding outcome measures. Responses must have sustained for at minimum of 8 weeks for the participant to be included in the tally.
Time frame: Periodic evaluation (weekly up to a month, followed by 4x28 day cycles = 16weeks) with additional cycles and titrations depending upon treatment response; up to 2 years
Number of Patients With Hematologic Improvement in Platelet Counts (HI-P)
The Number of Patients with Hematologic Improvement in Platelet Counts (HI-P) was assessed based on the MDS 2006 IWG criteria. Patients demonstrating an absolute increase of ≥ 30 × 10\^9/L (for those patients starting with \> 20 × 10\^9/L platelets) or an increase from \< 20 × 10\^9/L to \> 20 × 10\^9/L along with an increase of at least 100%, were deemed to have demonstrated HI-P improvement.
Time frame: Periodic evaluation (weekly up to a month, followed by 4x28 day cycles = 16weeks) with additional cycles and titrations depending upon treatment response; up to 2 years
Number of Patients With Hematologic Improvement in Erythrocyte Counts (HI-E)
The Number of Patients with Hematologic Improvement in Erythrocyte Counts (HI-E) was assessed based on the MDS 2006 IWG criteria. Patients demonstrating an Hgb increase by ≥ 1.5 g/dL were deemed to have improvement in HI-E. Only transfusions given for a Hgb of ≤ 9.0 g/dL pretreatment were counted in the RBC transfusion response.
Time frame: Periodic evaluation (weekly up to a month, followed by 4x28 day cycles = 16weeks) with additional cycles and titrations depending upon treatment response; up to 2 years
Number of Patients With Hematologic Improvement in Neutrophil Counts (HI-N)
The Number of Patients with Hematologic Improvement in Neutrophil Counts (HI-N) was assessed based on the MDS 2006 IWG criteria. Patients demonstrating an increase of at least 100% and an absolute increase \> 0.5 × 10\^9/L were determined to have shown an improvement in HI-N.
Time frame: Periodic evaluation (weekly up to a month, followed by 4x28 day cycles = 16weeks) with additional cycles and titrations depending upon treatment response; up to 2 years
Time to Attain Hematologic Improvement (HI)
Time to hematologic improvement as determined by median time required to achieve HI response.
Time frame: Periodic evaluation (weekly up to a month, followed by 4x28 day cycles = 16weeks) with additional cycles and titrations depending upon treatment response; up to 2 years
Duration of Hematologic Improvement (HI)
Duration to hematologic improvement as determined by median duration of HI response.
Time frame: Time to progression/relapse following hematologic improvement, at completion of final cycle and treatment discontinuation; up to 6 years
Number of Patients With Clinically Significant Bleeding Events
Number of Patients With Clinically Significant Bleeding Events
Time frame: Treatment initiation through study completion, up to 2 years
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.