This study is designed to take a first step toward testing the efficacy and acceptability of heart rate variability biofeedback (HRVB) as a means of ameliorating psychological distress in survivors of Primary Brain Tumour (PBT). HRVB is a biofeedback approach that provides clients with real time feedback about their heart rate variability (HRV) as a means of teaching them how to breathe in a specific, therapeutic manner. More specifically, this study has been designed to test several hypothesises. Each hypothesis is based on the prediction that, in a sample of psychologically distressed PBT survivors, a course of 8 HRVB sessions will demonstrate: * statistically significant reductions in levels of depression * statistically significant reductions in levels of anxiety * statistically significant increases in resting HRV * that reductions in anxiety and depression will be significantly, negatively correlated with increases in resting HRV * that the HRVB will be viewed as an acceptable intervention by the participants In addition to the hypothesises stated above, the study will also investigate in a discovery oriented manner if the HRVB intervention will have positive impacts on the participants: * levels of sleep impairment * levels of pain
Purpose This study will test the efficacy and acceptability of heart rate variability biofeedback (HRVB) as a means of ameliorating psychological distress in survivors of Primary Brain Tumour (PBT). HRVB is a biofeedback approach that provides clients with real time feedback about their heart rate variability (HRV) as a means of teaching them how to breathe in a specific, therapeutic manner. HRVB has been shown to increase autonomic nervous system efficiency and also to decrease both anxiety and depression. Background Rationale Anxiety and depression are two of the strongest drivers of overall quality of life (Q of L) in survivors of primary, malignant brain tumour (PMBT). In a cohort of 73 PMBT survivors, "depression scores alone accounted for more than half of the all variance in Q of L scores" (Pelletier et al, 2003, p. 47). Anxiety symptoms were similarly negatively correlated with over-all Q of L(r = -..72) in brain tumour survivors (Janda et al., 2007). Evidence also suggests that, relative to the general population, brain tumour survivors exhibit much higher rates of both depression (Wellisch et al., 2002)and anxiety (Arnold et al., 2007). Despite these striking findings around the prevalence and importance of anxiety and depression in the brain tumour population, not a single identified study has used a purely psychological intervention to ameliorate symptoms of depression and/or anxiety in this unique, understandably distressed population. Therefore, research of this kind is urgently needed. Heart Rate variability Biofeedback A course of HRVB, or some close variant of it, has shown statistically significant effects on depression and/or anxiety in numerous studies. HRVB has also recently been found to associated with improvements in pain and insomnia, two other common barriers to quality of life in PMBT survivors. Design Overview As a very early stage study, a one group, open label design has been adopted. Recruitment Process Participants will be recruited by sending letters to potential participants identified through the BC Cancer Agency registry and by encouraging referrals from local oncologists. Measures The primary outcome measures will be resting HRV, the Beck Depression Inventory II, the Trait Anxiety Inventory. Secondary outcome will include the Short Form McGill Pain Questionnaire and the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index. Likert scale questionnaires will also be used after the intervention to assess the acceptability of the intervention. HRVB Protocol The protocol will involve 8 weekly sessions of up to 60 minutes each, following the general approach described by Lehrer, Vaschillo, \& Vaschillo (2000). Participants will also practice breathing at their resonant frequency for 20 minutes each day at home. Analysis Three forms of analysis will be conducted. First, paired t-tests of residualized changes scores and effect sizes (Cohen's d) will be used to analyze pre-post changes on all of the psychometric measures and on the HRV data. Second, correlational analysis will also be used to see if there are expected associations between pre-post changes in emotion, pain and sleep measures relative to pre-post changes in resting HRV indices. Finally, means and standard deviations will be used to assess participants' likert ratings on the acceptability of the intervention. Plans for Current Findings Results will be developed for publication in relevant, peer reviewed scientific journals. Results will also be used to develop future research in this line, including studying the effciacy of HRVB with psychologically distressed caregivers of PMBT survivors.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
15
BC Cancer Agency
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Change from baseline in score on Beck Depression Inventory II at 8 weeks
Widely used self report measure to assess for symptoms of depression.
Time frame: comparison of scores immediately pre-intervention and then immediately post-intervention (8 weeks later)
Change from baseline scores on trait form of the State Trait Anxiety Inventory (Spielberger et al., 1983)at 8 weeks
The Trait Anxiety Inventory is a widely used self report measure of anxiety symptoms.
Time frame: comparison of scores immediately pre-intervention and then immediately post-intervention (8 weeks later)
Change from baseline in resting HRV High Frequency Power
Baseline level of High Frequency HRV power (0.15-0.4 Hz) measured in ms2/Hz recorded over 5 minutes of rest at pre-intervention compared to level of High Frequency HRV power (0.15-0.4 Hz) measured in ms2/Hz recorded over 5 minutes of rest recorded aqt post-intervention
Time frame: comparison of scores immediately pre-intervention and then immediately post-intervention (8 weeks later)
Resting Low Frequency HRV power (0.04-0.15 Hz)
Baseline level of Low Frequency HRV power (0.15-0.4 Hz) measured in ms2/Hz recorded over 5 minutes of rest at pre-intervention compared to level of Low Frequency HRV power (0.04-0.15 Hz)measured in ms2/Hz recorded over 5 minutes of rest recorded aqt post-intervention
Time frame: comparison of scores immediately pre-intervention and then immediately post-intervention (8 weeks later)
Change in the standard deviation of all NN intervals from baseline in resting heart beat
This metric measures the standard deviation of normal beat-to-beat intervals (SDNN) that are present within the heart rythm. it is a time domain measure of HRV and it serves as a marker of overall adaptability of the nervous system.
Time frame: comparison of scores immediately pre-intervention and then immediately post-intervention (8 weeks later)
Subjective Acceptability ratings
This will be a 5 point Likert scale asking how acceptable the participants found the experience of particiapting in the intervention to be , from "not at all acceptable" to "very acceptable".
Time frame: To be completed immediately post-intervention (8 weeks after the intiation of training)
Change from baseline score on the Short Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SFMPQ)(Melzack, 1987)
The SFMPQ is a widely used measure of pain related experience.
Time frame: comparison of scores immediately pre-intervention and then immediately post-intervention (8 weeks later)
Change from baseline in scores on the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (Buysse et al., 1989)
The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (Buysse et al., 1989)is a widely used self report measure of sleep quality.
Time frame: comparison of scores immediately pre-intervention and then immediately post-intervention (8 weeks later)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.