Short and long term outcomes of total knee arthroplasty patients surgically exposed with patellar eversion are compared to those patients exposed by laterally retracting the patella. It was hypothesized that there would be no difference.
Background: Patellar mobilization during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has been debated, with some proponents of minimally invasive TKA suggesting that laterally retracting, rather than everting the patella may be beneficial. It was our hypothesis that by using randomized, prospective, blinded study methods, there would be no significant difference in clinical outcome measures based solely on eversion of the patella during total knee arthroplasty. Methods: After an a priori power analysis was done, 120 primary total knee replacements indicated for degenerative joint disease were included in the study and randomized to one of two patella exposure techniques: lateral retraction or eversion. Collaborating investigators and patients were blinded to randomization.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
120
Patients randomized to the eversion group had patellas everted during the flexion portions of the surgery. Patients randomized to the retraction group had patellas everted only for the patellar resurfacing portions of the surgery. Both groups were mobilized with anterior tibial translation. All other aspects of surgery including postoperative care, anticoagulation, pain control, and physical therapy were done as per standard arthroplasty protocols at our institution.
Lenox Hill Hospital
New York, New York, United States
change in quadriceps strength
Quadriceps strength was measured isometrically using a Biodex dynamometer with the patient's knee in 60 degrees of flexion.
Time frame: preop, 6 weeks, 3 months, 1 year postop
change in ability to perform straight leg raise
For the purposes of this study, we defined the ability to straight leg raise as a patient independently raising their heel 6 inches off of the bed with foot dorsiflexed and knee fully extended without extension lag.
Time frame: up to three days postop
change in Visual Analog Scale of Pain
Patient reported pain using standardized VAS diagram
Time frame: preop, up to 3 days postop, 6 weeks, 3 months, and 1 year postop
change in Ambulation Distance
Time frame: up to 3 days postop
Length of Hospital Stay
Time frame: expected average 2 to 3 days
change in SF-36 score
Time frame: preop, 6 weeks, 3 months, 1 year postop
change in Range of knee motion
goniometer used to standardize measurements
Time frame: preop, 6 weeks, 3months, 1 year
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.