The purpose of this study is to determine what the effects are of real-time continuous glucose monitoring on glycemia and quality of life in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus and impaired hypoglycemia awareness.
The investigators hypothesize that the use of RT-CGM, relative to a control intervention using masked CGM, will result in improvement of various measures of glycemia and indicators of quality of life, reduce the occurrence of hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia and restore hypoglycemia awareness in T1DM patients with IHA. We will test this hypothesis by addressing the following research questions: What is the effect of 16 weeks of RT-CGM use, versus 16 weeks of CGM use, in patients with T1DM and IHA on 1. (primary objective:) time spent in euglycemia 2. (secondary objectives:) * (diabetes-specific) markers of QoL, covering diabetes-related emotional distress (PAID-5), fear of hypoglycemia (HFS-2), self-efficacy (CIDS), health status (EQ5D) and emotional well-being (WHO-5) * other glycemia variables, including HbA1c and time spent in hypo- and - hyperglycemia ranges * the incidence and duration of hypoglycemic episodes * changes in hypoglycemia awareness score according to Gold et al., 3. (tertiary objectives:) * measures of glucose variability * the autonomic nervous system balance * the duration of wear of the RT-CGM device * patients' therapy adjustments during the interventions * hypoglycemia awareness scores according to Clarke et al. * satisfaction with use of CGM * the number of contact moments not planned according to the study schedule * absence of work of patient (and spouse) * the global estimated costs of use of health care
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
52
Active Comparator: MiniMed Paradigm® Veo™-system Placebo Comparator: iPro™2 Continuous Glucose Monitor (masked)
VU University Medical Center
Amsterdam, North Holland, Netherlands
Time spent in the euglycemic range
The mean difference in time spent in the euglycemic range (interstitial glucose \>3.9-\<10.0 mmol/L), expressed as hours/day between the two 16-week intervention periods, i.e. RT-CGM versus masked CGM in patients with T1DM and IHA.
Time frame: 45 weeks
Quality of life
(diabetes-specific) markers of QoL, covering diabetes-related emotional distress (PAID-5), fear of hypoglycemia (HFS-2), self-efficacy (CIDS), health status (EQ5D) and emotional well-being (WHO-5)
Time frame: 45 weeks
Glycemia variables
Other glycemia variables, including HbA1c and time spent in hypo- and hyperglycemia ranges
Time frame: 45 weeks
Hypoglycemic episodes
The incidence and duration of hypoglycemic episodes
Time frame: 45 weeks
Changes in hypoglycemia awareness score
Changes in hypoglycemia awareness score according to Gold et al.
Time frame: 45 weeks
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.