This randomized phase II trial studies how well pomalidomide and dexamethasone work compared to lenalidomide and dexamethasone in treating patients with multiple myeloma that has returned after a period of improvement (relapsed) or did not respond to previous treatment with lenalidomide (refractory). Pomalidomide and lenalidomide may help the immune system kill cancer cells and may also prevent the growth of new blood vessels that tumors need to grow. Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as dexamethasone, work in different ways to stop the growth of cancer cells, either by killing the cells, by stopping them from dividing, or by stopping them from spreading. Dexamethasone may also help pomalidomide and lenalidomide work better by making cancer cells more sensitive to the drugs. It is not yet known whether pomalidomide and dexamethasone or lenalidomide and dexamethasone are effective in treating patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma.
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. To assess the confirmed response rate of the combination of lenalidomide and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed myeloma who have previously become refractory to lenalidomide. (Arm A) II. To assess the confirmed response rate of the combination of pomalidomide and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed myeloma who have previously become refractory to lenalidomide. (Arm B) SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To assess the toxicity in each arm in patients with relapsed myeloma who have previously received lenalidomide. II. To assess the response rates with pomalidomide and dexamethasone in patients relapsing on lenalidomide and dexamethasone. (Arm A) III. To assess time to progression and overall survival with each approach. OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms. ARM A: Patients receive lenalidomide orally (PO) daily on days 1-21 and dexamethasone PO on days 1, 8, 15, and 22. Courses repeat every 28 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients experiencing progressive disease may crossover to arm B. ARM B: Patients receive pomalidomide PO daily on days 1-21 and dexamethasone as in arm A. Courses repeat every 28 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up periodically.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
9
Mayo Clinic
Rochester, Minnesota, United States
Proportion of Confirmed Tumor Responses Defined to be a Partial Response or Better Noted as the Objective Status on Two Consecutive Evaluations
The proportion of successes will be estimated in each arm independently by the number of successes divided by the total number of evaluable patients. Confidence intervals for the true success proportion will be calculated according to the approach of Duffy and Santner. A confirmed tumor response is defined to be a partial response or better noted as the objective status on two consecutive evaluations while receiving lenalidomide and dexmethasone (Arm A) or pomalidomide and dexamethasone (Arm B). All patients meeting the eligibility criteria who have signed a consent form and have begun treatment will be evaluable for response.The International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) uniform response criteria (Rajkumar et al, 2011) will be used to assess response to therapy.
Time frame: Up to 2 years
Number of Participants With Adverse Events, Graded According to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 4.0
Recorded and reported for each patient, and frequency tables will be reviewed to determine adverse event patterns. These results are reported in the Adverse Events section of this CT.gov report.
Time frame: Up to 30 days after last day of study drug treatment
Overall Survival
The distribution of survival time will be estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier. Due to an early closer from slow accrual the data from both arms was combined in survival analysis.
Time frame: Time from registration to death due to any cause, assessed up to 2 years
Time to Progression
The distribution of time to progression will be estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier. The International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) uniform response criteria (Rajkumar et al, 2011) will be used to assess response to therapy.
Time frame: Time from registration to the earliest date with documentation of disease progression, assessed up to 2 years
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.